| HOME >> MEDICINE >> TECHNOLOGY |
Phase 2 Study Details
The open-label, rater-blinded, randomized study enrolled 334 treatment- naïve patients with early, active, RRMS. The trial compares the safety and efficacy of alemtuzumab to Rebif. This is the first time that a potential new therapy for multiple sclerosis has undergone a prospective, controlled, multi- year, head-to-head comparison to a recommended first-line therapy.
In the trial, patients with RRMS at 49 medical centers in Europe and in the U.S. were treated with alemtuzumab at one of two doses (12 or 24 mg IV per day for five days at initial treatment, and for three days in the subsequent yearly treatments), or Rebif (44 mcg administered subcutaneously three times per week, as indicated in its product label). Although treating physicians were aware of which treatment patients received, independent (blinded) neurologists assessed the disability efficacy endpoint and performed relapse evaluations.
Primary endpoints in the trial were the annualized relapse rate and the time to Sustained Accumulation of Disability as measured by an increase in EDSS scores lasting at least six months. The efficacy and safety data analyses were reviewed by an independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board. The final analysis of the primary endpoints in CAMMS223 will be based on data through three years in all patients.
In addition to the results of the co-primary endpoints outlined above, Dr. Coles presented the interim results of the change from baseline in MRI T2 lesion volume and mean EDSS, which are secondary and tertiary endpoints, respectively. Each of these findings supports the results seen in the primary endpoints.
Safety Results
In the comparison of safety parameters of alemtuzumab vs. Rebif,
a greater number of serious adverse events (a subset of total
adverse events) were rep
'"/>