accine in terms of the response of thepatient rather than the response of the tumor. While the ResponseCriteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) experimental standards works wellin evaluating therapies that are toxic to tumors such as radiationor chemotherapy they are less capable of measuring the more subtlesystemic effects of immune response Schlom said. While there is n
accine in terms of the response of the
patient, rather than the response of the tumor. While the Response
Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) experimental standards works well
in evaluating therapies that are toxic to tumors, such as radiation
or chemotherapy, they are less capable of measuring the more subtle
systemic effects of immune response, Schlom said.
While there is no conclusive evidence to explain why a vaccine may
lead to better patient survival, Schlom believes the evidence
suggests that vaccines are, in fact, priming the immune system.
“Vaccines are not passive, they induce a dynamic process of
immune response that, in many cases may keep the tumor in check and
enhance the effectiveness of subsequent therapies,” Schlom
said.
About Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines
Unlike preventative vaccines, like those that protect against human
papillomavirus or the flu, therapeutic cancer vaccines are given in
the hopes of treating an existing disease. These cancer vaccines
generally fall into two categories: cell-based, where vaccines are
created using cells from the patient’s own immune system that
have been activated to the presence of cancer antigens and
delivered back to the patient along with additional proteins that
facilitate immune activation; and vector-based, where an engineered
virus, or vector, is used to introduce cancer proteins and other
molecules to stimulate the immune system. Both approaches are
designed to rile the patient’s immune system into attacking
tumor cells.