Navigation Links
Mangrove Partners Responds to Erroneous CPEX Assertions
Date:3/4/2011

NEW YORK, March 4, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- Mangrove Partners, owners of 149,373 shares representing approximately 5.71% of the outstanding shares of CPEX Pharmaceuticals, Inc (Nasdaq: CPEX), believes its analysis and intentions were inaccurately portrayed in CPEX's March 2, 2011 letter to stockholders, which appears to use scare tactics in order to pressure stockholders into accepting an inadequate price for their shares.

Commenting on the merger, Nathaniel August replied, "At its most basic level the merger makes no sense. The buyer is funding only $3 million of equity yet there is approximately $10 million in transaction fees being paid to management and advisors."

As regards CPEX's scare tactics, Nathaniel August remarked, "When we first purchased CPEX stock last April, management told us the outlook for Testim was wonderful following the FDA's response to Auxilium Laboratories, Inc.'s Citizen's Petition, which states that future generic competitors must file a full NDA. Now that management is about to capture their change of control payments, CPEX is only too willing to tell stockholders how awful the outlook is for Testim."

Mangrove Partners would like to highlight the following inaccuracies in CPEX's letter:

  • CPEX's letter fails to inform stockholders of the Citizen's Petition regarding generic versions of Testim (and a subsequent affirmation of that response), which requires potential competitors to file a full NDA, an extremely costly process, in order to be approved.
  • Competing and generic products have been well known since before CPEX issued its proxy statement, which forecasts continued growth in the Testim royalty over the next four years despite the new competition. Is CPEX backing away from this projection? Although our analysis suggests that Testim is often used after AndroGel® has been ineffective, in which case we see little threat to the existing user base, we used CPEX's own projections in the proxy statement showing slower future revenue growth as compared to the historic rate. Even with this slowdown, we show the DCF value of CPEX using the proxy statement's projections far exceeds the merger price.
  • CPEX claims we don't account for legal costs of maintaining the patents, but the truth is we use the proxy statement's projected G&A expenses. On page 36 of the Company's most recent 10-K legal costs are clearly included in G&A. Is CPEX now saying management's figures were wrong?
  • CPEX claims we make dividend projections for future years, but the truth is we just show potential 2011 dividends based on CPEX's projections in its proxy statement. If CPEX thinks the proxy statement is correct, then the dividend will actually grow for the next 3-4 years. Many royalty trusts we use as comparables already have declining production yet trade at 7-8% yields.

We are frustrated that CPEX seems to simply disavow their own figures in an effort to scare stockholders into accepting an offer that undervalues CPEX but provides management with lucrative change of control payments and its advisors with substantial fees.

Mangrove Partners believes there are two questions in evaluating the merger. First, is this a fair price? CPEX's advisors use a DCF valuation and Mangrove Partners used CPEX's own projections from the proxy statement to show that a DCF valuation far exceeds the $27.25 per share offered in the merger. CPEX has failed to show or even assert that our DCF analysis contains any errors. Second, is there a better alternative to the merger? Mangrove Partners has suggested either creating a royalty trust or refocusing on dividends. CPEX has failed to show any errors with our analysis showing that CPEX could pay an $8-9 per share annual dividend as a royalty trust or an $8-10 per share special dividend and a $4-5 per share annual dividend as a standalone company. Mangrove Partners stands behind its analysis, all of which is based on management's projections in the proxy statement.

Mangrove Partners did have several discussions with CPEX's advisors, but it was denied access to management and to the elected stockholder's representatives of CPEX, the Board. In our discussions, we never made an offer to purchase CPEX and we currently have no intention of making such an offer. CPEX's advisors conditioned a management call on agreeing to onerous confidentiality restrictions and limiting discussion to written questions submitted in advance. The simple truth is that the Board and management have refused to have any dialogue with us and have never returned our calls. What is so scary about a conversation with one of your stockholders?

Mangrove Partners was further confused by CPEX's assertion that voting down the merger is "Mangrove's only path to a profitable investment." Had the Board read our filings, they would know that we have made money on our investment in CPEX. At this point, Mangrove Partners only cares about maximizing value and our future per share returns will replicate the returns earned by all other stockholders. In fact, publicizing our opposition to the transaction comes at our sole expense, yet a better outcome will be shared by all stockholders. This is the opposite outcome of the merger, which has management receiving large change of control payments while stockholders are denied better alternatives such as a royalty trust, dividend focused company, or dividend recapitalization. Our interests are aligned with fellow stockholders.

Instead of addressing stockholders' concerns, CPEX has derided Mangrove Partners for its investment in CPEX. We understand the sale process was time consuming and the Board is recommending the merger, but that does not excuse CPEX's unwillingness to engage with shareholders. We strongly encourage the Board and management to open a two-way dialogue with their stockholders and question why Robert Hebert was listed as the investor contact on CPEX's press release when to the best of our knowledge he has not returned shareholder calls for months.

Mangrove Partners opposes the proposed merger based on the following factors:

  • Inadequate Price: The merger represents only 3.6x 2011 forecast operating profit and is a discount to the debt being raised by the acquirer. The inadequate price was further revealed when the acquirer's stock more than doubled after announcing it will acquire CPEX.
  • Better Alternatives: CPEX can refocus itself on paying its earnings out can afford a dividend of over $4 per share without touching its estimated net cash position of over $9 per share. Alternatively, CPEX may be able to spinoff Testim into a royalty trust paying over $8 per share in annual dividends. We believe CPEX is worth substantially more as a standalone company than the merger consideration being offered.  
  • Conflicted Management: Management is set to receive change of control payments of over $7.3 million or over 10% of the value of CPEX.
  • Faulty Fairness Opinion: The fairness opinion is lacking key elements such as comparable transactions and comparable companies analyses. The DCF analysis provided to stockholders appears misguided and we could not replicate its conclusions using the banker's methodology.

Investors with questions concerning our reasons for voting against the merger should call Steven C. Balet or Geoff Sorbello at Okapi Partners LLC, which is advising Mangrove Partners, toll free at 1-877-285-5990.

Mangrove Partners' prior letters and presentations to CPEX can be found here:



'/>"/>
SOURCE Mangrove Partners
Copyright©2010 PR Newswire.
All rights reserved

Related medicine technology :

1. Health Diagnostic Laboratory, Inc. (HDL, Inc.) Partners With Gamma Therapeutics to Offer Breakthrough Diagnostic Assay for Heart Attack and Stroke Risk
2. New Image Global, Inc. Partners With Limbs For U, Charitable Service Group to Provide Prosthetic Limbs in the Dominican Republic
3. Thomas, McNerney & Partners Expands Team and Moves West Coast Office to San Diego
4. Sheffield Bio-Science and Wockhardt Announce Worldwide Exclusive Partnership to Supply Recombinant Insulin to Cell Culture Market
5. BioStorage Technologies Partners with AMDeC, LLC to Provide Tissue Storage and Cold Chain Logistics Services to Academic Medical Research Institutions
6. Verathon Inc., Maker of BladderScan and GlideScope Medical Instruments, Partners With IVUmed to Sponsor Traveling Resident Scholars
7. Patient Safety Technologies, Inc. to Present at the ROTH Capital Partners 23rd Annual OC Growth Stock Conference
8. Luminex and Partners HealthCare Announce Collaboration Agreement
9. Takeda Enters Into Global Strategic Partnerships With Covance and Quintiles
10. Pharmaceutical Industry Rapidly Expanding Partnerships With New Entrants in Health Care Space, Ernst & Young Finds
11. Thought Leader Select Announces Media Partnership with Marketing4Health
Post Your Comments:
*Name:
*Comment:
*Email:
(Date:5/12/2017)... , May 12, 2017  The China and Canada ... technology that consumes less water, energy and detergent, and features a ... product LaughingU, a shoebox-sized washing machine that washes and sanitizes women,s ... ... LaughingU, is compact, and does not require an external water inlet. ...
(Date:5/10/2017)... BARRINGTON, Ill. , May 10, 2017 ... medicine today; unfortunately its costs have also spiraled to ... are being sent to radiology than ever before as ... and diagnosis.  For a patient with lower back pain ... prove no anatomical reason for pain, resulting in entirely ...
(Date:5/9/2017)... 9, 2017  Semler Scientific, Inc. (OTCQB: SMLR), ... to improve the clinical effectiveness and efficiency of ... first quarter ended March 31, 2017. ... customers to identify when preventive care options are ... like heart attacks or strokes occur," said ...
Breaking Medicine Technology:
(Date:5/24/2017)... ... 2017 , ... Altec Products, Inc., a leader in enterprise document ... technology conference in San Diego, CA. , At nVerge 2017, Altec will be ... and enhance their Sage ERP solutions by providing improved visibility and control to the ...
(Date:5/24/2017)... ... May 24, 2017 , ... ... Bayside, NY, who have now spent 10 years as clinical instructors for the ... (NYU) College of Dentistry. Through the program, private practitioners receive cutting-edge clinical training ...
(Date:5/24/2017)... ... ... Patients who want to receive cosmetic dentistry procedures such as Invisalign® or ... consultation, with or without a referral. Dr. Bedich enjoys improving the appearance of his ... Bedich offers a variety of cosmetic dentistry services at his practice that are designed ...
(Date:5/24/2017)... ... May 24, 2017 , ... Myers Jackson is well known for auctioning ... sell luxury homes anywhere on the planet. The luxury home market is alive and ... Houston city-scapes. A quick search of “11 Spyglass Hill Auction will enlighten you on ...
(Date:5/24/2017)... Orion, Michigan (PRWEB) , ... ... ... a disease affecting the female reproductive tract in which the endometrial lining ... pelvic structures causing inflammation and pain. Patients experiencing painful intercourse, painful periods, ...
Breaking Medicine News(10 mins):