chairmen, and they're playing a prominent role on both sides of the aisle. So I relish those guys and connections.
In this job -- I'm aware of the kerfuffle here a few months ago -- is he or isn't he; is he part of the executive branch, part of the legislative branch? And the answer really is, you've got a foot in both camps. I obviously work for the President. That's why I'm sitting here in the West Wing of the White House. But I also have a role to play in the Congress as the President of the Senate. I actually get paid -- that's where my paycheck comes from, is the Senate.
So I try to keep lines open to both sides of the Congress, both the House and the Senate. I had that office in the House for six years while we had the majority. I think I'm the first Vice President who ever had an office in the House -- on the House side as Vice President; something Denny Hastert and Bill Thomas arranged. Charlie Rangel got it back, obviously, when control switched, which was -- he's perfectly entitled to. That was the Old Ways and Means Committee space, just off the House floor.
Q Do you look at the policies of the Democratic Congress as pushing
anything specifically related to fighting the war on terror -- (inaudible)
-- detainees and other issues like that, but also the war on Iraq, given
the descriptions that they're trying to put on -- (inaudible) -- If they
were to prevail, what would that mean for the American people? I mean, do
you -- I mean, if you sort of cut to the bone of what you guys say and what
I think, I mean, do you -- would the country be significantly more at risk
for a terrorist attack if they were to prevail in the fight in Iraq, if
they were to prevail in
|SOURCE White House Press Office|
Copyright©2007 PR Newswire.
All rights reserved