Sunitinib has been found to be an effective agent for treating metastatic renal cell cancer, a disease for which no effective treatment options are available so far//.
There is an urgent need for more active agents for the treatment of metastatic (spread of cancer from point of origin to another part of the body) renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The 5-year survival rate for metastatic RCC is estimated to be less than 10 percent, according to background information in the article. RCC is highly resistant to chemotherapy, and only a limited subset of patients (20 percent or less) benefit from cytokine (proteins from the immune system) therapy (high-dose interleukin-2 [IL-2] and/or interferon-alfa). Overall median survival following progression after cytokine therapy is approximately 10 to 13 months, and no effective treatment is available for patients whose disease progresses after an initial response, or who do not respond to cytokine therapy.
A better understanding of the genetic abnormalities associated with clear-cell RCC has helped identify new targets for therapy, and subsequently the development of a new therapy, the oral medication sunitinib, which had positive results in an initial study.
Robert J. Motzer, M.D., of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, and colleagues conducted a multicenter phase 2 trial to confirm the antitumor efficacy of sunitinib in 106 patients with metastatic clear-cell RCC whose disease was refractory (unresponsive) to 1 prior cytokine therapy.
Patients were enrolled between February and November 2004, with follow-up continuing until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Patients received repeated 6-week cycles of sunitinib, 50 mg per day given orally for 4 consecutive weeks followed by 2 weeks off per treatment cycle.
“The results of this trial confirm that sunitinib given once daily according to a 4 weeks on/2 weeks off schedule has sub
stantial antitumor effects against metastatic clear-cell RCC. Of the 105 evaluable patients, 36 patients achieved partial response (34 percent), and a median progression-free survival of 8.3 months as evaluated by the independent third-party core imaging laboratory (resulting in a value considerably longer than expected in this clinical setting),” the authors write.
The most common adverse events experienced by patients were fatigue 30 (28 percent) and diarrhea 21 (20 percent).
Related medicine news :1
. Promising Treatment for Diabetes2
. Life after Bypass not so Promising for Women.3
. Promising cure for West Nile Virus
. Deadly Diarrhoea Vaccine – Trail Results Promising5
. Novartis MS Drug Shows Promising Results6
. Promising Care Model For Bipolar Disorder7
. A Promising New Vaccination Strategy for Late-Stage Melanoma8
. Promising Brain Tumor Treatment In The Offing9
. Sea Creatures Toxin Could Lead to Promising Cancer Treatment10
. Vaccine Promising Against Hepatitis E11
. Groups Join Forces to Fund Promising Lung Cancer Research