It has been found that cardiovascular clinical trials published between 2000 and 2005 varied in their results depending on whether they were funded by for-profit //organizations or by not-for-profit organizations.These were the finding of a study in the May 17 issue of JAMA.
Surveys of randomized trials published between 1990 and 2000 raised awareness in the medical community that trials funded by for-profit (FP) organizations were more likely to report positive findings than those funded by not-for-profit (NFP) organizations. These surveys raised questions regarding the design and conduct of industry funded clinical trials as well as certain ethical concerns, according to background information in the article. Whether recognition of these concerns has affected contemporary clinical trials was unknown.
Paul M. Ridker, M.D., of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Jose Torres, B.A., of Harvard Medical School, Boston, analyzed outcomes of 324 cardiovascular clinical trials published between 2000 and 2005 in JAMA, The Lancet, and the New England Journal of Medicine, stratifying the results on whether the trial was funded by for-profit or not-for-profit organizations and if the trial outcome favored newer treatments over the standard of care. Of the 324 trials, 21 cited no funding source.
Overall, 58.6 percent of the 324 trials reported evidence significantly favoring newer treatments, while 34.6 percent reported no significant difference between therapies, and 6.8 percent reported evidence significantly favoring standard of care. Among not-for-profit trials, 49 percent of 104 reported evidence significantly favoring newer treatments, whereas 51 percent either significantly favored standard of care or showed no difference.
Among for-profit trials, 67.2 percent of 137 reported evidence significantly favoring newer treatments with 32.8 percent reporting data favoring standard of care or no difference. The proportion of trials s
'"/>Page: 1 2 Related medicine news :1.
Hormone Deficiency Results In Miscarriage2.
Breast Implants May Interfere With The Interpretation Of Mammogram Results3.
DNA Testing For More Accurate Results4.
Operating on a Beating Heart Yields Better Results For Blocked Heart Arteries 5.
Intense Fight Against Polio In India Gets Results6.
Deadly Diarrhoea Vaccine – Trail Results Promising7.
Novartis MS Drug Shows Promising Results8.
Results Of Human Trials Of Hungarian Bird-Flu Vaccine Expected Today9.
Dealing With Stress Results In Better Academic Performance10.
Excess Intake of Alcohol Results in Permanent DNA Damage.11.
Study Reveals Better Results in Patients Suffering From Depression.