Navigation Links
Wikipedia Accurate on Cancer Facts, But Hard to Read: Study
Date:9/15/2011

THURSDAY, Sept. 15 (HealthDay News) -- The facts about cancer found on the website Wikipedia are about as accurate as the information on the disease found on the patient-oriented section of the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Physician Data Query (PDQ), a comprehensive peer-reviewed cancer database, according to a new study.

Although experts from Thomas Jefferson University were hard-pressed to find errors on Wikipedia, they did find the content on the site was harder to read and included links to more dense information than the simplified, shorter explanations found on PDQ.

"There are a vast number of websites where patients can obtain cancer information," study leader Dr. Yaacov Lawrence, adjunct assistant professor of radiation oncology at Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, and director of the Center for Translational Research in Radiation Oncology at the Sheba Medical Center in Israel, said in a university news release.

"The purpose of this study was to answer one question: Is the cancer information on Wikipedia correct? Reassuringly, we found that errors were extremely rare on Wikipedia. But the way information was presented on PDQ is more patient-friendly," Lawrence said.

Wikipedia is commonly not considered a trustworthy source of information since the writers -- whether amateur journalists or medical specialists -- develop the content found on the site without professional oversight. Nevertheless, the study found the site ranked among the top 10 results for more search engines, higher than the PDQ and professionally maintained government websites. The study authors also pointed out that Wikipedia updates more quickly.

In conducting the study, researchers chose 10 types of cancer and compared the information on the diseases' epidemiology, etiology, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment and controversial topics in cancer care found on Wikipedia with the information found on PDQ. The content on both sites were vetted for accuracy against textbooks.

The investigators also used standard algorithms based on word and sentence length to calculate the information's readability.

The study, released online in advance of print publication in the Journal of Oncology Practice, revealed that less than 2 percent of the information on either Wikipedia or PDQ did not coincide with the facts found in textbooks. The researchers found the information on the two websites were equally comprehensive. They also noted both sites discussed controversial aspects of cancer care poorly.

The main difference between Wikipedia and the PDQ site was their readability. Wikipedia was written at a college level, while PDQ was written so that a 9th grader could understand it.

"PDQ's readability is doubtless due to the site's professional editing, whereas Wikipedia's lack of readability may reflect its varied origins and haphazard editing," explained Lawrence. "Overall our results are reassuring: on the one hand Wikipedia appears to be extremely accurate, on the other, the resources invested in the creation and upkeep of the PDQ are clearly justified."

The study authors recommend that patients use the PDQ site first so they are not inundated by complex information and hyperlinks. They added that more research is needed to determine how the differences in readability of these sites affects patients' understanding and retention of information about the disease.

More information

The American Cancer Society provides more information on cancer.

-- Mary Elizabeth Dallas

SOURCE: Thomas Jefferson University, news release, Sept. 15, 2011


'/>"/>
Copyright©2010 ScoutNews,LLC.
All rights reserved  

Related medicine news :

1. Study finds cancer information on Wikipedia is accurate, but not very readable
2. Insulation from public pressure leads to more accurate suicide reporting by death investigators
3. Sudden cardiac death in young athletes: Study suggests many ECG screenings are inaccurate
4. Pediatric cardiologists not always accurate in interpreting ECG results for young athletes
5. Concussion baseline important for accurate future assessment in at-risk youth athletes
6. U.S. Database of Breast Cancer Treatment May Be Inaccurate
7. Getting an accurate read on Parkinsons
8. Walking distance test an accurate indicator of disease severity in patients with COPD
9. Patient reports of relatives cancer history often not accurate
10. Practice can make search-and-rescue robot operators more accurate
11. MDCT arthrography accurately identifies
Post Your Comments:
*Name:
*Comment:
*Email:
Related Image:
Wikipedia Accurate on Cancer Facts, But Hard to Read: Study
(Date:5/2/2016)... MA (PRWEB) , ... May 02, 2016 , ... Pregnancy ... tips when trying to conceive. , “If you are ready to have ... Mache Seibel. “My book, HealthChequesTM: Journal Babies is your Personal Conception & Pregnancy ...
(Date:5/2/2016)... ... May 02, 2016 , ... TeleMedCo™, a new company ... automate and improve the rapid diagnosis, triage and admission of patients leveraging IBM ... and mobile experience for the first time at GENBAND’s Perspectives16 conference. , ...
(Date:5/2/2016)... (PRWEB) , ... May 02, 2016 , ... ... Research & Analytics EVP and GM Jim Callandrillo and Duane Reed, VP ... 55th Annual Pharmaceutical Business Intelligence and Research Group (PBIRG) General Meeting ...
(Date:5/2/2016)... ... May 02, 2016 , ... Atlantic Information Services, Inc. (AIS) is pleased ... Model Could Transform the Pharma Landscape .” CMS recently proposed a test of alternate ... provider-administered drugs while preserving care provided to beneficiaries. The webinar will review the details ...
(Date:5/2/2016)... , ... May 02, 2016 , ... For many artists, ... artist Curt Walter has developed it into a science. , Using the new, ... achieve subtly differentiated shades that add depth and meaning to his works. What’s more, ...
Breaking Medicine News(10 mins):
(Date:4/28/2016)... , April 28, 2016 ... Review, H1 2016" is a report that provides ... helps strengthen R&D pipelines by identifying new targets ... Company Profiles discussed in this H1 ... Farmaceutiche Riunite Srl, AbbVie Inc., Abiogen Pharma S.p.A., ...
(Date:4/27/2016)... le 27 Avril 2016 ... progressé de +5% sur le trimestre, soutenu par ... consommables  Croissance de +16% des ventes ... Mauna Kea Technologies (Euronext : MKEA, FR0010609263 ; OTCQX : ... laser, annonce aujourd,hui son chiffre d,affaires pour le ...
(Date:4/27/2016)... York , April 27, 2016 ... report titled, "Skincare Devices Market - Global Industry Analysis, ... According to the report, the global skincare devices market ... is anticipated to expand at a CAGR of 10.1% ... in 2023. Browse the full Skincare Devices Market ...
Breaking Medicine Technology: