Navigation Links
Wikipedia Accurate on Cancer Facts, But Hard to Read: Study
Date:9/15/2011

THURSDAY, Sept. 15 (HealthDay News) -- The facts about cancer found on the website Wikipedia are about as accurate as the information on the disease found on the patient-oriented section of the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Physician Data Query (PDQ), a comprehensive peer-reviewed cancer database, according to a new study.

Although experts from Thomas Jefferson University were hard-pressed to find errors on Wikipedia, they did find the content on the site was harder to read and included links to more dense information than the simplified, shorter explanations found on PDQ.

"There are a vast number of websites where patients can obtain cancer information," study leader Dr. Yaacov Lawrence, adjunct assistant professor of radiation oncology at Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, and director of the Center for Translational Research in Radiation Oncology at the Sheba Medical Center in Israel, said in a university news release.

"The purpose of this study was to answer one question: Is the cancer information on Wikipedia correct? Reassuringly, we found that errors were extremely rare on Wikipedia. But the way information was presented on PDQ is more patient-friendly," Lawrence said.

Wikipedia is commonly not considered a trustworthy source of information since the writers -- whether amateur journalists or medical specialists -- develop the content found on the site without professional oversight. Nevertheless, the study found the site ranked among the top 10 results for more search engines, higher than the PDQ and professionally maintained government websites. The study authors also pointed out that Wikipedia updates more quickly.

In conducting the study, researchers chose 10 types of cancer and compared the information on the diseases' epidemiology, etiology, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment and controversial topics in cancer care found on Wikipedia with the information found on PDQ. The content on both sites were vetted for accuracy against textbooks.

The investigators also used standard algorithms based on word and sentence length to calculate the information's readability.

The study, released online in advance of print publication in the Journal of Oncology Practice, revealed that less than 2 percent of the information on either Wikipedia or PDQ did not coincide with the facts found in textbooks. The researchers found the information on the two websites were equally comprehensive. They also noted both sites discussed controversial aspects of cancer care poorly.

The main difference between Wikipedia and the PDQ site was their readability. Wikipedia was written at a college level, while PDQ was written so that a 9th grader could understand it.

"PDQ's readability is doubtless due to the site's professional editing, whereas Wikipedia's lack of readability may reflect its varied origins and haphazard editing," explained Lawrence. "Overall our results are reassuring: on the one hand Wikipedia appears to be extremely accurate, on the other, the resources invested in the creation and upkeep of the PDQ are clearly justified."

The study authors recommend that patients use the PDQ site first so they are not inundated by complex information and hyperlinks. They added that more research is needed to determine how the differences in readability of these sites affects patients' understanding and retention of information about the disease.

More information

The American Cancer Society provides more information on cancer.

-- Mary Elizabeth Dallas

SOURCE: Thomas Jefferson University, news release, Sept. 15, 2011


'/>"/>
Copyright©2010 ScoutNews,LLC.
All rights reserved  

Related medicine news :

1. Study finds cancer information on Wikipedia is accurate, but not very readable
2. Insulation from public pressure leads to more accurate suicide reporting by death investigators
3. Sudden cardiac death in young athletes: Study suggests many ECG screenings are inaccurate
4. Pediatric cardiologists not always accurate in interpreting ECG results for young athletes
5. Concussion baseline important for accurate future assessment in at-risk youth athletes
6. U.S. Database of Breast Cancer Treatment May Be Inaccurate
7. Getting an accurate read on Parkinsons
8. Walking distance test an accurate indicator of disease severity in patients with COPD
9. Patient reports of relatives cancer history often not accurate
10. Practice can make search-and-rescue robot operators more accurate
11. MDCT arthrography accurately identifies
Post Your Comments:
*Name:
*Comment:
*Email:
Related Image:
Wikipedia Accurate on Cancer Facts, But Hard to Read: Study
(Date:12/7/2016)... ... December 07, 2016 , ... ... financial consultation services to residents in the Sacramento/Folsom region, is initiating a charity ... facility. , The Another Choice Another Chance treatment center in Sacramento works to ...
(Date:12/7/2016)... ... December 07, 2016 , ... A. Kevin Spann Insurance, ... families throughout the Five Boroughs, is launching a charity drive to raise funds that ... the traditions and spirit of marines and Navy FMF Corpsmen. Working closely with the ...
(Date:12/7/2016)... ... December 07, 2016 , ... Facial plastic surgeon, Dr. John D. Rachel ... a portion of proceeds to two local organizations: North Chicago Animal Control and Friends ... is a team of authorized and trained volunteers who support rescued animals held ...
(Date:12/7/2016)... ... December 07, 2016 , ... The medical profession is well aware that heart ... major study analyzing heart attacks among 138,602 people recorded a 35% higher number of ... would all agree of course–no time of year is a good time for a ...
(Date:12/7/2016)... Norwalk, CT (PRWEB) , ... December 07, 2016 ... ... the Integrated Infertility and Wellness (IFW) Program at Reproductive Medicine Associates of Connecticut ... which now has a team of three acupuncturists to help patients realize their ...
Breaking Medicine News(10 mins):
(Date:12/7/2016)... , Dec. 7, 2016 According to responses from ... than one-third (38%) of patients with non-small cell lung cancer ... factor receptor (EGFR) genetic mutation status. The findings of the ... LBA ID #6067 #P3.02b ) at the 2016 World ... . The survey results revealed an overall ...
(Date:12/7/2016)... Conn. , Dec. 7, 2016 ... II trial in patients with unresectable malignant pleural ... survival (PFS). The data, presented at the 17 ... in Vienna , showed nintedanib ... to placebo plus pemetrexed/cisplatin, with a significantly improved ...
(Date:12/7/2016)... Today, Stock-Callers.com presents four Biotech equities ... ), Anthera Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NASDAQ: ANTH ), ProNAi ... (NASDAQ: AVXS ). From its peak in July ... reach a level equal to what it saw at the ... for the year, it has still out-performed other market sectors, ...
Breaking Medicine Technology: