Navigation Links
Use of unproven mammography tool soars with Medicare coverage
Date:6/14/2010

(SACRAMENTO, Calif.) In a study illustrating the potentially powerful influence of political pressure on medical practice, a UC Davis physician-researcher has found that use of a largely unproven mammography screening device has surged since Medicare began covering its cost.

Joshua Fenton, assistant professor in the UC Davis Department of Family and Community Medicine, with colleagues from the University of Washington and University of Minnesota, examined use of computer-aided detection (CAD), a medical device designed to help radiologists interpret mammograms, since Congress mandated that Medicare pay for it 10 years ago.

He found that the prevalence of CAD jumped from 5 percent in 2001 when Medicare began covering it, to 27 percent in 2003, the most recent year for which data was available. Extra mammography fees for CAD use cost Medicare an estimated $19.5 million in 2003 alone. But actual costs are probably greater because the device has been associated with higher recall rates and greater use of diagnostic tests such as breast biopsy.

The increase in computer-aided detection use occurred even though "systemic reviews point to uncertainty regarding whether CAD has a clinically important impact on key breast cancer outcomes," Fenton writes in today's issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine.

The authors explain that Medicare coverage of the device was key to marketing the device to hospitals and health-care facilities, which resulted in intense lobbying of Congress for approval of CAD as a covered benefit.

"This illustrates how industry and government interact to determine the course of health-care practice, and it's not really guided by science," Fenton said. "This is a case in which expensive technology gets widely adopted in clinical practice before it is proven effective."

Computer-aided detection software analyzes the mammogram image and marks suspicious areas for radiologists to review. In a previous study of more than 200,000 women who had mammograms, published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2007, Fenton and colleagues found that CAD produced excessive false-positive results. His research demonstrated that when it was used, 32 percent more women were recalled for additional tests and 20 percent more women had a breast biopsy, yet use of the software had no clear impact on the early detection of breast cancer.

"This argues that we need a way of evaluating technologies before we put them into practice," Fenton said. "The government has a huge stake in this. And once the train leaves the station, it's difficult to call it back."

In the current review, Fenton suggests that intense lobbying by manufacturers of the technology, combined with the politically volatile issue of breast cancer screening, resulted in fast-track approval by the government of Medicare coverage of the device. He also argues that industry representatives were better able to market the device, which require a large capital investment of over $100,000, after providers were assured their costs would be reimbursed by the government insurance program.

In an accompanying commentary in the same issue of the Archives, Karla Kerlikowske, professor of medicine, epidemiology and biostatistics at UC San Francisco, says health-care providers and others cannot presume that newer technologies are better than existing ones.

"Health-care providers should not adopt new technologies without first demanding scientific evidence beyond that required for FDA approval," she writes, adding that such evidence should include not just clinical benefits, but also important associated harms and whether benefits outweigh those harms.


'/>"/>

Contact: Dorsey Griffith
dorsey.griffith@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu
916-734-9118
University of California - Davis - Health System
Source:Eurekalert

Related medicine news :

1. Detection of breast cancer in screening mammography has improved over time
2. Palpable breast cancers are more common in women not undergoing annual mammography
3. Breast cancer screening: No added value through mammography
4. Combined mammography and breast MRI useful for some high-risk women
5. ACR, SBI: Avon Survey Reveals Potentially Deadly Effects of USPSTF Mammography Recommendations
6. Carol Milgard Breast Center Awarded Highest Government Rating for Mammography Sites
7. Change in mammography guidelines questioned
8. Digital mammography delivers significantly less radiation than conventional mammography
9. Mammography may increase breast cancer risk in some high-risk women
10. Mammography May Increase Breast Cancer Risk in Some High-Risk Women
11. Underage Drinking Soars in U.S.
Post Your Comments:
*Name:
*Comment:
*Email:
(Date:2/19/2017)... ... February 19, 2017 , ... ... home healthcare, will join forces with Healthwise ® at HIMSS 2017 ... the industry leader in evidence-based health education, technology and services, will demonstrate a ...
(Date:2/18/2017)... , ... February 17, 2017 , ... ... drvallecillos.com , Beverly Hills plastic surgeon Dr. Glenn Vallecillos ... , Dr. Vallecillos says, "Traditionally, plastic surgery has been centered around that idea ...
(Date:2/17/2017)... ... 2017 , ... Smiles by Seese is a comprehensive family dental practice ... leads the practice as a skilled and highly credentialed dentist who is qualified to ... patients of all ages with excellence in general, restorative, and cosmetic dentistry . ...
(Date:2/17/2017)... ... 2017 , ... For the first time, International Scholarship and ... floor for the 2017 HIMSS Conference & Exhibition at the Orange ... than 40,000 healthcare industry professionals are expected at the conference, where they will ...
(Date:2/17/2017)... , ... February 17, 2017 , ... ... has been named a finalist in the 8th Annual DecisionHealth Platinum Awards in ... delivery system. Qualis Health’s work is recognized across multiple award categories, highlighting four ...
Breaking Medicine News(10 mins):
(Date:2/20/2017)... 2017 Acute, Chronic and Prophylaxis GVHD ... a CAGR of 7% from 2016-2021 and CAGR of 3% from 2021-2027. ... 2016 to 2027. The market is estimated at $0.36bn in 2016, $0.51bn ... ... how you can exploit the future business opportunities emerging in this sector. ...
(Date:2/19/2017)... , Feb. 19, 2017  nThrive™, an ... cycle portfolio and thought leadership at the 2017 ... a category leader award from KLAS. ... discussion focused on how market trends shape the ... particularly a sophisticated, comprehensive Patient Access solution. The ...
(Date:2/19/2017)... ORLANDO, Fla. , Feb. 18, 2017 ... that positive Phase 1 clinical data for Nektar,s lead ... (RCC) were presented at ASCO GU 2017.  NKTR-214 is ... T cells and Natural Killer (NK) cell abundance directly ... on these immune cells.  The results were presented by ...
Breaking Medicine Technology: