Navigation Links
UMSOM dean urges caution in revising diagnostic guidelines for gestational diabetes

A number of important questions and issues should be addressed before changes are made to the guidelines for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes, according to a new article by University of Maryland School of Medicine Dean E. Albert Reece, M.D., Ph.D., M.B.A., published online in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology on Oct. 31. The article publishes in advance of a new National Institutes of Health (NIH) initiative to reconsider diagnostic guidelines for the condition.

The NIH Office of Disease Prevention has called a Consensus Development Conference in early 2013 to assess available scientific evidence. At the end of the conference, an independent panel will publicly disclose its findings, assessing and analyzing evidence including a literature review and expert presentations. In advance of the event and possible recommendations for changing diagnostic criteria, Dean Reece and co-author Thomas Moore, M.D., professor and chairman of the Department of Reproductive Medicine at the University of California, San Diego, urge caution in their article.

"Some in obstetrics and gynecology and maternal-fetal medicine have advocated for change to the diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes for some time now," says Dean Reece, who is also vice president for medical affairs at the University of Maryland and John Z. and Akiko K. Bowers Distinguished Professor at the University of Maryland School of Medicine. "Others, including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, say it is not clear that change is needed. Dr. Moore and I have considered the arguments and evidence on both sides. We have concluded that before change is made, there needs to be careful analysis of the possible risk, cost and benefit involved in any revisions. If the data aren't available to answer these questions, it would seem prudent and advisable to delay change at this time."

Two additional articles, both asserting concerns about revisions to the diagnostic criteria, have been published electronically in other journals in advance of the conference. Both articles were co-authored by Oded Langer, M.D., Ph.D., maternal-fetal medicine expert at Cookeville Medical Regional Center in Tennessee; Jason G. Umans, M.D., Ph.D., F.A.C.P., scientific director of the MedStar Health Research Institute in Maryland and associate professor of medicine at Georgetown University; and Menachem Miodovnik, M.D., chairman of women's services at MedStar Washington Hospital Center. "Perspectives on the Proposed Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diagnostic Criteria" appeared in the journal, Obstetrics & Gynecology, and "The proposed GDM diagnostic criteria: A difference, to be a difference, must make a difference" appeared in the Journal of Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Medicine.

The authors advised that "such a change would dramatically increase the number of women identified as having this disease and place a significantly greater burden on an already overburdened primary health care system."

Gestational diabetes is a condition that can be potentially devastating to pregnancies. Even mild forms of hyperglycemia could potentially pose significant adverse health consequences for pregnant women and their children. Advocates for changing diagnostic criteria increasing the number of women diagnosed with and thus treated for the condition could reduce morbidity and health care costs. Those cost reductions, however, could be offset by an increase in patients diagnosed and treated, according to Dean Reece.

Some studies have shown that such a change could potentially improve health outcomes for mothers and their babies, but at least one prominent study showed that the potential public health benefits will only occur if a higher level of care is given to newly diagnosed patients. Changing the criteria also could increase cesarean delivery rates, which could increase health care costs and offset any public health gains involved with diagnosing and treating more patients.

"The scientific dilemma to change or not to change, thus, requires a rigorous analysis of the scientific, economic, practice, and legal ramifications as well as the pros and cons to achieve a satisfactory answer," the article by Dean Reece and Dr. Moore concludes.


Contact: Karen Robinson
University of Maryland Medical Center

Related medicine news :

1. US Drug Watchdog Now Urges All Recalled DePuy ASR Hip Implant Recipients Call Them For The Names Of The Best Attorneys Out Of Fear The Recipients Will Get Nothing
2. US Drug Watchdog Now Urges All DePuy Pinnacle Hip Implant Recipients To Know The Symptoms Of A Failure And Offers To Name The Best Lawyers & Law Firms For Failure Victims
3. The US Drug Watchdog Now Urges Plaintiffs Law Firms Worldwide To Contact Them About A Possible International Effort To Help Victims Of Defective Drugs Or Medical Devices
4. Mesothelioma Victims Center Urges US Navy Veterans or Anyone with Mesothelioma to Call Them for the Names of the Best Mesothelioma Attorneys in the US-Quality Matters
5. Mesothelioma Victims Center Now Urges US Navy Veterans Or Individuals With Mesothelioma To Call Them For The Names Of The Best Mesothelioma Attorneys & Treatment Options
6. Corporate Whistle Blower Center Now Urges Medical Device Insiders To Be A Whistleblower If They Can Prove The Device Maker Knew Of A Failure & Said Nothing=Huge Rewards
7. ASBMR task force urges use of fracture liaision services to reduce costly osteoporosis bone breaks
8. Pediatricians Group Urges Flu Shot for Kids Aged 6 Months and Up
9. ACP urges Congress to halt across-the-board sequestration cuts in health programs
10. Penn study cautions use of drugs to block niacin flush
11. Supplements and cancer prevention: A cautionary tale
Post Your Comments:
(Date:11/24/2015)... Florida (PRWEB) , ... November 25, 2015 , ... ... planning and monitoring. Their Care Plan software creates an agreement between the ... patient care plan, including financial, scheduling, monitoring, notification, and projections. Click ...
(Date:11/24/2015)... ... 24, 2015 , ... Eric C. Seidel, DMD and Stephanie ... the revolutionary BIOLASE WaterLase iPlus 2.0™ system. This advanced laser technology uses light ... dentist in Gettysburg, PA . From routine visits to cosmetic treatments, laser ...
(Date:11/24/2015)... ... ... Dr. Todd S. Afferica, a noted general dentist in Norcross, GA ... Afferica now uses the BIOLASE WaterLase iPlus 2.0™ in many of his dental procedures. ... traditional cutting tools, such as the scalpel and high-speed drill, which can both cause ...
(Date:11/24/2015)... Mississauga, ON (PRWEB) , ... November 24, 2015 , ... ... Deborah Williams without a referral for dental implants at her Mississauga, ON ... qualified and experienced in the placement of dental implants. , Missing teeth can ...
(Date:11/24/2015)... ... November 24, 2015 , ... Young patients with a wide variety ... Wolfman and Dr. Kedar S. Lele, who are pediatric dentists in Tucson, AZ ... the WaterLase iPlus 2.0™ system causes minimal discomfort and bleeding to the patient during ...
Breaking Medicine News(10 mins):
(Date:11/25/2015)... 2015 Research and Markets ( ) ... - Global Forecast to 2020" report to their ... for 37.21% of the total market share in 2014. ... region is projected to growth at the highest CAGR ... primarily to the fast growing water, industrial gas treatment, ...
(Date:11/25/2015)... November 25, 2015 --> ... sie eine Lizenz für das Patent über eine neue ... und ENS-Lyon innehaben, an Enyo Pharma vergeben haben. ... ins Leben gerufenen und von Edelris gemeinsam mit seinen ... ein Behandlungsziel für HBV identifiziert, und es wurden neue ...
(Date:11/25/2015)... November 25, 2015 ... addition of the  "Global Drug Device ... to their offering.  --> ... of the  "Global Drug Device Combination ... their offering.  --> Research ...
Breaking Medicine Technology: