-- Second, are new proxy voting guidelines adopted by government employee pension funds in Connecticut, New York City, and Maryland that also address product stewardship issues.
-- Third, are recent revisions to the proxy voting guidelines of Institutional Shareholder Services, the largest proxy voting advisory service in the United States, recognizing the need for companies to better address toxic chemicals in their supply chains.
The report makes 3 recommendations to the mutual fund industry:
-- Adopt proxy voting guidelines similar to ISS or TIAA-CREF.
-- Follow TIAA-CREF's lead and survey their participants' opinions on responsible investing, including shareholder activism.
-- Fund trustees should explore issues of links between toxic chemicals and financial risk with their investment managers and consultants.
The report also urges investors in mutual funds to contact their funds' investor services department to ask that funds adopt proxy voting guidelines addressing these issues
Many mutual funds seem to be ignoring the business case behind shareholder resolutions seeking to reduce toxics in consumer products. What's worse, many mutual funds also seem to be voting against their shareholders' health. Funds that continue to turn a tin ear towards toxics may find themselves losing market share in the very competitive mutual fund marketplace.
For the full report, go to http://iehn.org/publications.reports.mutualfunds.php on the Web.
METHODOLOGY
IEHN's analysis of mutual fund voting draws on a database of voting
behavior of 1,400 funds in 64 mutual fund families compiled by Jackie Cook
of Boardmap Research, Vancouver, Canada. This is an extensive but not
exhaustive
'/>"/>
| SOURCE Investor Evironmental Health Network (IEHN), Washington,D.C.
Copyright©2008 PR Newswire. All rights reserved |