Navigation Links
Study update: Cancer information on Wikipedia is accurate, but not very readable
Date:9/15/2011

PHILADELPHIA--It is a commonly held that information on Wikipedia should not be trusted, since it is written and edited by non-experts without professional oversight. But researchers from the Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson have found differently, according to a study published online Sept. 15 in the Journal of Oncology Practice.

Reassuringly, they found that cancer information found on a wiki was actually similar in accuracy and depth to the information on a peer-reviewed, patient-oriented cancer web site. There is one caveat, however: they found that the information on the peer-reviewed site was written in plainer English.

Data from this study was presented at the 2010 ASCO Annual Meeting in Chicago, but the full study, with some new details, was published online Sept. 15.

New data revealed that Wikipedia ranks higher in search engine results and updates faster. It also shed light on those hyperlinks embedded into content: Wikipedia takes you to more dense information, the researchers found, whereas a peer-reviewed site offer up a simplified, shorter explanations.

For the study, researchers led by Yaacov Lawrence M.D., adjunct assistant professor of Radiation Oncology at Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, and currently Director of the Center for Translational Research in Radiation Oncology at the Sheba Medical Center in Israel, compared the cancer information found on Wikipedia with the information found on the patient-oriented section of the National Cancer Institute's Physician Data Query (PDQ), a comprehensive peer-reviewed cancer database.

"There are a vast number of web sites where patients can obtain cancer information," Dr. Lawrence said. "The purpose of this study was to answer one question: Is the cancer information on Wikipedia correct? Reassuringly, we found that errors were extremely rare on Wikipedia. But the way information was presented on PDQ is more patient-friendly."

Dr. Lawrence and his colleague Malolan Rajagopalan, M.D.,from the University of Pittsburgh, started by choosing ten cancer types and selecting key factual statements for each cancer from standard oncology textbooks. The material covered epidemiology, etiology, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment and controversial topics in cancer care.

Medical student volunteers examined the PDQ and Wikipedia articles against the prepared statements. The web pages were printed out to ensure that each individual looked at the same version of the articles. Standard algorithms were used to calculate readability based upon word and sentence length.

For both web sites, inaccuracies were extremely rare: less than two percent of the information on either site was discordant with that presented in the textbooks. There was no difference between the sites in depth of coverage. Both sites poorly discussed controversial aspects of cancer care.

For example, they both scored poorly for coverage of options for prostate cancer, including watchful waiting versus radiation treatments. "The issues were not really dealt with in depth," said Dr. Lawrence.

But the PDQ site was notably more readable: whereas PDQ was written at a level suitable for a 9th grader, Wikipedia was written at a level suitable for a college student. This difference was highly statistically significant.

Researchers also found that Wikipedia ranked among the first 10 results for most search engines, including Google, for various medical terms and diseases tested, surpassing professionally maintained, government Web sites.

The research revealed that Wikipedia updates faster than PDQ; however, the hyperlinks embedded within Wikipedia take the user to more dense information. PDQ takes you to more simplified explanations on the content a user clicks on for more information.

"PDQ's readability is doubtless due to the site's professional editing, whereas Wikipedia's lack of readability may reflect its varied origins and haphazard editing," Dr. Lawrence said. "Overall our results are reassuring: on the one hand Wikipedia appears to be extremely accurate, on the other, the resources invested in the creation and upkeep of the PDQ are clearly justified.

"The sites appear to be complementary but I recommend to my patients that they start with PDQ where they are less likely to get lost in jargon and hyperlinks."

The next step is to repeat the study with cancer patients to truly determine how this difference in readability impacts upon patients' understanding and retention of information, Dr. Lawrence said.


'/>"/>

Contact: Steve Graff
stephen.graff@jefferson.edu
215-955-5291
Thomas Jefferson University
Source:Eurekalert

Related medicine news :

1. Wikipedia Accurate on Cancer Facts, But Hard to Read: Study
2. Study finds protein critical to breast cancer cell proliferation, migration
3. Cleveland Clinic researchers awarded NIH grant to study concussion-identifying blood test
4. Breast Cancer Rates Jump Worldwide, Study Finds
5. Not Enough Kids Drink Low-Fat Milk, U.S. Study Finds
6. ADHD Doubles a Childs Risk of Injury: Study
7. Shorter treatment with hepatitis C drug combination may be more beneficial, study shows
8. Study to examine direct-to-consumer drug ads on TV
9. Drinking Patterns Affect Heart Health, Mouse Study Finds
10. Quitting Smoking May Improve Personality, Study Suggests
11. More Mammograms Equal More Mastectomies: Study
Post Your Comments:
*Name:
*Comment:
*Email:
(Date:6/24/2017)... , ... June 24, 2017 , ... The weather is ... time outdoors. Home and business owners should be aware that the summer months provide ... In fact, mechanical locks and keys can be negatively affected from direct exposure to ...
(Date:6/23/2017)... ... June 23, 2017 , ... The Rhode Island Quality ... Management Alerts and Dashboards, an innovative new service enabling healthcare providers to proactively ... Management Alerts and Dashboards provide near real-time data about patients admitted to and/or ...
(Date:6/23/2017)... , ... June 23, 2017 , ... By scoring 100% ... ninth consecutive four-star rating from premier online charity evaluator, Charity Navigator, validating ANRF's work ... 1% of all charities reviewed by Charity Navigator and earns ANRF a spot on ...
(Date:6/23/2017)... , ... June 24, 2017 , ... Studies show evidence ... reduce the risk of visual loss in these patients. , But how often do ... or smoking cessation to patients at risk of or with early symptoms of AMD? ...
(Date:6/23/2017)... (PRWEB) , ... June 23, 2017 , ... ... plastic surgeon practicing in Newburgh, New York, has recently begun offering three new ... to offering the best cutting-edge procedures and reducing downtime, Dr. Rubinstein is excited ...
Breaking Medicine News(10 mins):
(Date:6/14/2017)...  ivWatch LLC, a medical device company focused on ... is pleased to announce it was the Bronze Winner ... and Equipment at the 2017 Medical Design Excellence Awards ... The award was presented by Medical Device and Diagnostics ... New York during MD&M East, ...
(Date:6/11/2017)... and Company (NYSE: LLY ) announced today ... an investigational treatment for the prevention of episodic and ... endpoints for galcanezumab compared to placebo at both studied ... REGAIN) will be presented today at the American Headache ... . "The detailed Phase 3 ...
(Date:6/8/2017)... Responding to Heath Ledger,s father,s recent call for ... Chris Cornell in May, the mental health watchdog group, ... psychiatric drug side effects search engine ... risks. The father of the late actor ... has called for tighter rules on prescription drugs. Speaking at ...
Breaking Medicine Technology: