MIT'S SLOAN, COLUMBIA, NORTHWESTERN'S KELLOGG AND PENN'S WHARTON IN FULD & COMPANY WAR GAME SIMULATION--Sloan Students Win Close Competition for Third Time in Last Five Years
CAMBRIDGE, Mass., April 13 /PRNewswire/ -- Four top business schools recently predicted in a public war game that most prominent companies in the healthcare information technology and healthcare delivery industries--including Microsoft, McKesson, Kaiser-Permanente, and Allscripts--will quickly move to create alliances and in certain cases merge with their rivals--to take advantage of the government push to adopt electronic medical records (EMRs).
This year's event, "The Battle for Healthcare Information," was held in New York City on April 3, 2009, and is the fifth national war game championship organized and run by Cambridge, Mass-based Fuld & Company. As in past war game contests in the technology industry, this contest, featuring teams from the Wharton School of Business, Columbia University School of Business, MIT's Sloan School of Management, and Northwestern's Kellogg School of Management is expected to accurately anticipate competitive events.
According to Leonard Fuld, president and founder of Fuld & Company, "In this day-long event, teams assumed the identity of four major healthcare icons, simulating and 'stress testing' their anticipated strategies to determine who will profit from the adoption of EMR. The Obama Administration's injecting $19 billion to kick-start this nascent electronic medical records industry just gets the players moving. It is no guarantee you will see universal adoption of electronic records in healthcare anytime soon."
Among the predictions during this fast-paced business school war game event are:
- Entrenched interests will continue to resist EMRs for some time to come. Healthcare system change, engendered by EMR, means some interests will win dollars while other traditional players will lose - and no one wants to lose. Physician, hospital and patient/consumer markets--are going to be major challenges for all companies in the field, the teams acknowledged. Hospitals and doctors actually can make money through these current inefficiencies and will likely resist change. Smaller medical practices may continue to resist installing such EMR systems, not wanting to invest in long-term promises while sinking lots of money into new and complicated electronic medical records systems. Emerging pay-for-performance requirements, and reimbursement incentives may sway the thinking though.
- A shortage of technical manpower will slow down the implementation of electronic medical records, no matter how much money is thrown against the challenge.
- Allscripts (and other similar pure plays, such as Epic) will seek to exploit cheaper web-based solutions to bring EMRs to smaller medical practices. In order to penetrate the small medical practice market, where most of the EMR potential user base exists, it will have to look to stripped-down, cheaper cloud computing solutions rather than the client/server solutions sold to larger medical practices and hospitals. It may also have to look to form an alliance or merge with a larger player that has a far more extensive sales force, such as a pharmaceutical firm, to effectively access the small medical practice market across the nation.
- The market that is driving efficiencies, such as EMRs and other scalable solutions, will act as a catalyst to force small medical practices to band together or merge in the next few years, allowing doctors to spread the cost - and the risk - of EMR implementation.
- Kaiser-Permanente seeks to lower healthcare costs by "undocking" healthcare information within its system, vastly increasing the access and portability of patient data. As a major healthcare provider, Kaiser is well positioned to set industry best-practices and influence adoption of EMR systems, rather than provide the 'killer app' platform itself. Kaiser will become the nexus of important alliances between government and industry to craft standards in healthcare IT--e.g., to afford interoperability of data-related tools and technologies--that have been nonexistent.
- McKesson will be working to vastly expand its healthcare IT niche through its dominance in logistics and understanding of the health value chain, data creation and data utility--with an emphasis on physician, payor and healthcare delivery applications. The company will be looking to generate synergies among all these different points of the healthcare delivery chain through information technology.
MIT's team, simulating the McKesson strategies, won the war game competition based on four criteria: its strategic insight, accuracy in presenting McKesson's strategy, creative ways it expressed McKesson's culture and goals. , and, finally, its ability to project its strategic vision into the future. Last year's war game on "The Battle for the Wireless Internet" , won by the Kellogg MBA team, successfully predicted a number of industry alliances.
Fuld & Company has facilitated war games for companies around the globe. These are typically private, closed-door sessions for executives needing to make critical decisions.
The Annual Strategy War Game National Championship, "The Battle for Healthcare Information," was organized by Fuld & Company's Pharmaceuticals Practice, which provides all levels of competitive support from research to consulting. The firm has serviced over 100 biotech, pharmaceutical and diagnostics/device companies for training, custom research, and systems consulting needs. Fuld assesses new product progress from early-stage development to product launch, technology partnerships between biotech and big pharma, as well as changing global technologies, regulations, and markets. The firm has researched over 60 different therapeutic categories worldwide.
Fuld & Company's strategic gaming practice is run by Wayne Rosenkrans, Ph.D., a Distinguished Fellow at the Center for Biomedical Innovation at MIT working on healthcare strategy and policy issues related to science and medicine, and a member of the Ethics and Systems Medicine Program at Georgetown University. He is also Chairman, President and a member of the board of directors of the Personalized Medicine Coalition, a Washington DC-based organization working with government and other agencies on evolving healthcare policy for Personalized Healthcare.
Fuld & Company, based in Cambridge, Mass., with offices in London, is the world's preeminent research and consulting firm in the field of competitive intelligence. Founded by Leonard Fuld, a pioneer and recognized leading authority in the field, Fuld & Company is a full-service competitive intelligence firm, providing research and analysis, strategic gaming, intelligence process consulting, and training to help clients understand the external competitive environment. The firm's mission is to help clients improve their performance by making better decisions through the application of solid intelligence on their markets and competitors. Additional information can be found at: www.fuld.com.
Related medicine news :1
. For some diabetics, burden of care rivals complications of disease2
. Unleash Your Productivity and Drive Down Your Cost: Offload Tasks to a Team of Virtual Assistants3
. Pot-Smoking Drivers Tied to Range of Road Accidents4
. Quantum and IBM Align to Drive Medical Home Solution5
. Siemens Enhances Knowledge-Driven Solutions to Support Provider Quality of Care Initiatives6
. Blood, Marrow Drive Offers Hope for Baseball Player, 157
. Most Fatalities in Teen Crashes Are Not the Drivers8
. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois Teams with Chicago Bears Coach Lovie Smith in Diabetes Awareness Drive9
. Despite Patent Expiries of Leading Therapies, New Product Launches Will Drive a $4.6 Billion Increase in the Coronary Heart Disease Market10
. US Back Pain Market Approaches $23 Billion in 2018 - Anticipated Long-Acting, Abuse-Resistant Opioids Drive Value11
. Leader in Health Plan Cost Containment Cites Three Economy-Driven Reasons Why Self-Insured Health Plans Should Brace for Claim Increases and Fund Reserves Accordingly