Navigation Links
Risk factors may inform breast cancer screening
Date:4/30/2012

Choosing when to start regular breast cancer screening is a complicated decision for individual women and their providers. For most women, increasing age is the biggest risk factor for breast cancer, which is much more common at age 60 than at 40. But two new articles on other risk factors may inform guidelines and clinical practice about screening mammography from age 40 to 49.

The articles in the May 1 Annals of Internal Medicine provide information on how certain risk factors affect breast cancer risk and shift the balance between harms and benefits. Screening harms include false-positive results that can lead to invasive follow-up procedures and overdiagnosis, which prompts unnecessary treatment. Screening has a less favorable balance between benefits and harms in average-risk women in their 40s than in women aged 50 to 74.

This research addresses the need for more information about screening women in their 40sa need that the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force highlighted in its 2009 updated breast cancer screening guidelines. Also published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, these guidelines advise screening mammography every two years for women aged 50 to 74. The guidelines recommend that women in their 40s consider their personal values regarding the benefits and harms and then decide when to begin regular screening.

Group Health Research Institute Senior Investigators Diana Miglioretti, PhD, and Diana Buist, PhD, contributed to both of the new Annals articles. Together, the companion articles estimate that the benefits and harms of getting screening mammograms every two years are the same for groups of women aged 40-49 who have a twofold increased risk level of breast cancer as for groups of women aged 50󈞶 with an average breast cancer risk level. Factors that increase 40- to 49-year-old women's risk by twofold are having a first-degree relative (parent, sibling, or child) with breast cancer, or having extremely dense breast tissue (as seen on a mammogram).

"Mainly, we wanted to find out the tipping point: what level of increased risk women in their 40s needed to have to reach the same benefit-to-harm ratio for screening mammography as women aged 50 to 74," said Dr. Miglioretti. The international research team used data from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC), a U.S. research network of mammography registries. The BCSC is the nation's largest longitudinal collection of breast imaging data, covering 9.5 million mammograms, 2.3 million women, and 114,000 breast cancer cases so far. By continuously collecting information on breast cancer screening, risk factors, and cancer outcomes, the BCSC provides long-term data on screening as it occurs in everyday clinical practice to help answer preventive health care questions.

Tipping the balance of benefits and harms to favor screening mammography starting at age 40 years

In one article, Nicolien van Ravesteyn, MSc, Jeanne Mandelblatt, MD, MPH, and colleagues including Drs. Miglioretti and Buist identified the threshold of risk needed for women ages 40󈞝 to have comparable benefits and harms as seen when average-risk women aged 50󈞶 are screened every other year using mammography. They used four independent well-established simulation models that are part of the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) collaborative. Ms. van Ravesteyn is a researcher at Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and Dr. Mandelblatt is the associate director for population sciences at Georgetown University Medical Center's Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center in Washington, DC.

To estimate the benefits and harms of mammography screening for women in their 40s, the CISNET models used BCSC and other information on large populations of U.S. women. The results indicated that the benefits and harms from screening mammograms every two years for women 40-49 with a twofold increase in breast cancer risk are similar to those for average-risk women who start biennial screening at age 50. For annual screening, a fourfold increased risk level is where the benefits outweigh the harms for starting screening at age 40. There were only small differences in benefits using digital compared to plain-film mammography, but digital screening generates many more false-positive results than does plain film.

"Our population models show what can be expected across populations with different risk levels," Dr. Mandelblatt said. "The models cannot determine outcomes for individual women. Policymakers can use them to inform guidelines for populations."

Risk factors for breast cancer for women aged 40 to 49 years

The first author of the other article is Heidi D. Nelson, MD, MPH, an investigator at the Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center at Oregon Health & Science University and Providence Cancer Center in Portland. With Drs. Buist and Miglioretti and colleagues including Ellen O'Meara, PhD, a research associate at Group Health Research Institute, Dr. Nelson conducted a meta-analysisa rigorous review of previous studiesfrom 66 publications selected for their relevance and quality. They also conducted new analyses using BCSC data on more than 380,000 women who were 40-49 when they had a screening mammogram from 1994 to 2010, to see how family history and other risk factors affected breast cancer risk for women in their 40s.

Results indicated:

  • having a first-degree relative with breast cancer, especially one under age 50, increased risk by more than twofold
  • having extremely dense breasts on a mammogram increased risk by more than twofold
  • having a previous benign breast biopsy, a second-degree relative with breast cancer, or breast tissue that was heterogeneously dense on a mammogram increased risk between 1.5-fold and twofold.

"Most of the risk factors that we considered did not increase breast cancer risk," Dr. Nelson said. Other potential risk factors that they evaluatedsuch as race/ethnicity, body mass index, physical activity, and using alcohol, tobacco, or hormone therapyhad effects that were either small, undetectable, or equivocal. "Our results indicate that we can focus on just a few significant risk factors to simplify approaches to risk-based screening for women in their 40s," she added.

The research in the two articles was possible because three national research groupsBCSC, CISNET, and the Evidence-based Practice Centerjoined forces. Each contributed unique strengths: extensive data, comprehensive breast cancer models, and data interpretation. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force previously used information from the three groups to develop its current breast cancer screening recommendations.

In an accompanying editorial, Otis Webb Brawley, MD, chief medical officer and executive vice president of the American Cancer Society and author of the book How We Harm, referred to the BCSC and CISNET as "national treasures."

The authors called for additional research based on the findings, to see how well these risk estimates, which are based on large numbers of women, predict risks for individual women. In the meantime, said Dr. Buist, "taken together, the results from these articles provide strong evidence that professional groups can use to refine screening guidelines."


'/>"/>

Contact: Rebecca Hughes
hughes.r@ghc.org
206-287-2055
Group Health Research Institute
Source:Eurekalert  

Related medicine news :

1. Social Factors May Affect Lifespan More Than Race, Location
2. Race, Location Big Factors in American Diets
3. Training grant targets behavioral and social factors linked to health
4. Perception, work-life balance key factors in workplace safety, says UGA study
5. Impoverished schools, parent education key factors in student weight
6. Factors Linked to Age of Onset of Menopause Identified
7. Retention study identifies key factors affecting 3 generations of nurses
8. Researchers Identify Liver Cancer Risk Factors
9. Mayo Clinic studies identify risk factors in rising trend of liver cancer
10. Demographic and clinical factors appear associated with survival in patients with Parkinsons disease
11. Risk Factors for Vision Loss After Spine Surgery Identified
Post Your Comments:
*Name:
*Comment:
*Email:
Related Image:
Risk factors may inform breast cancer screening
(Date:4/29/2016)... ... April 29, 2016 , ... ... Celiac Association (CCA), is pleased to announce the launch of the GFCP ... articles, recipes, and more. The purpose of the GFCP Scoop site ...
(Date:4/29/2016)... ... April 29, 2016 , ... New York City based oral and maxillofacial surgeon Dr. ... very effective way to treat obstructive sleep apnea. Dr. Jamali is proud to offer this ... procedure that involves one or both jaw bones. This surgery is performed to correct the ...
(Date:4/29/2016)... ... April 29, 2016 , ... Jvion, the ... of funding led by Eastside Partners, with participation from existing investor Martin Ventures. ... base and accelerate its technology and product roadmap. , “Jvion is ...
(Date:4/29/2016)... ... April 29, 2016 , ... CURE ... entirely on patients with cancer, today announced that Lynne Malestic, RN, of Eisenhower ... 2016 CURE® Extraordinary Healer® for Oncology Nursing , which honors nurses who have ...
(Date:4/29/2016)... , ... April 29, 2016 , ... ... to promote their animal line of probiotics, Petbiotics ™, as they fondly ... turnout of animal rescue groups networking for their non-profit organizations. Animal rescues across ...
Breaking Medicine News(10 mins):
(Date:4/28/2016)... 28, 2016  While Abbott,s announced purchase of ... valve repair and stent business, healthcare research firm ... more firmly into patient monitoring.  Kalorama said that ... device areas, with double-digit growth expected the next ... Advanced Remote Patient Monitoring . Abbott Laboratories ...
(Date:4/28/2016)... 28, 2016 ... Phillips und Stephen Schmidt ... ArisGlobal®, ein führender Anbieter cloudbasierter Softwarelösungen ... bekannt, dass neue Führungskräfte zum Team Sicherheit ... die vielfältige Erfahrungen mitbringen.  Dies wird die ...
(Date:4/28/2016)... April 28, 2016 , Net Sales of ... basis over the prior year period, and an increase of ... , Diluted EPS for the first quarter were $0.52 reported, ... $2.00 adjusted, an increase of 29.9% over the prior year ... adjusted earnings guidance for 2016 Zimmer Biomet Holdings, ...
Breaking Medicine Technology: