Coalition for Clean & Safe Ports Calls on Members of Congress to Protect Port Green-Growth Policy that will Save Lives, Improve Safety & Security
LOS ANGELES and WASHINGTON, April 16 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- In a victory for the movement to clean the air and create good green jobs at our nation's ports, over 80 organizations united in the Coalition for Clean & Safe Ports in California celebrated U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon's denial of the Federal Maritime Commission's (FMC) motion for a preliminary injunction that would have threatened the San Pedro Bay Ports' Clean Trucks Programs.
Judge Leon's denial was based on the federal agency's failure to demonstrate that the LA and Long Beach Ports' differing "concession" models would cause irreparable harm to -- or create anti-competitive conditions for -- the goods movement industry. The Clean Trucks Programs aim to reduce diesel truck pollution by 80%, deliver $5 billion to the regional economy and create stronger safety and security enforcement. If successful, the initiatives will help clear a pathway to job-creating future port expansion projects.
The FMC has the ability to take action against agreements in the ocean shipping industry that it believes are likely by a reduction in competition to unreasonably raise rates and decrease services, but Judge Leon (appointed by George W. Bush), in his opinion, noted the Ports "are implementing ambitious, multi-faceted programs to reduce high levels of air pollution while also striving to improve the Ports' safety and security and to enable future development ... Given the protracted and public deliberative process that led to the development of the CTPs and the responsibility the [Ports] have for improving the area's public health and managing the Ports' efficient operations, the Court finds that the public interest, at this point, favors denying the FMC's motion" for a preliminary injunction.
"Protecting the public health is at the heart of this program, and it is paramount to all other concerns," said David Pettit, Director of the Southern California Air Program for the Natural Resources Defense Council. "All Californians should appreciate that a court on the other side of the country recognized our need to get these dirty trucks off the road once and for all. The only way to do that is to make well-capitalized companies -- not low-wage workers -- responsible for a new, clean-burning fleet."
The opinion comes just as the
The LA policy requires trucking firms to apply for concessions and take responsibility for new vehicles by legitimately employing their drivers. The comprehensive policy also includes generous subsidies funded by cargo container fees for truck purchases, along with powerful incentives that will help get alternative fuel trucks on the road quicker and jump start a new market. The Long Beach Port also relies on a concession plan, but has come under fire by environmental groups because the burden of replacing some 16,000 old diesel trucks remains on the backs of individual "independent" haulers who average $29,000 a year, rather than companies who are in a financial position to replace and properly maintain clean-fuel trucks.
The nation's largest trucking lobby opposes both plans, and successfully argued to a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals panel that their desire to maintain a deregulated industry outweighs the public interest in clean air that Judge Leon relies on in his opinion. Despite the Virginia-based American Trucking Association's maneuvering, many of its local and national members, comprised of nearly 1,000 trucking companies large and small, applied to become concessionaires and have purchased thousands of trucks, signaling a readiness to grow in an asset-based market.
"Diesel kills people in my neighborhood each and every week," said Bismark Sanchez Jr., a harbor-area resident. "As a father and a port truck driver, I am happy this judge ruled that my city's clean-air program is legal. But I'm scared that the hired guns at the American Trucking Association want another court to allow the industry to go on polluting."
Last winter, local residents and members of the over 80 national, state and local organizations comprising the Coalition for Clean & Safe Ports generated over 10,000 e-mails and postcards to Members of Congress representing pollution-affected regions surrounding the LA, Long Beach and Oakland ports. They urged their representatives to review the obstructionist actions of the FMC, and called on their elected leaders to help appoint new commissioners that share President Barack Obama's commitment to the environmentally and economically sound LA Clean Trucks Program.
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, along with Senators Boxer, Feinstein and the entire Democratic California delegation to Congress have each written to the FMC, urging it not to overstep its jurisdiction by interfering with a program that would "actually strengthen competition within the port trucking industry as well as between port trucking and their retail clients. Since port trucking costs are a relatively small component of overall transportation costs, the increased operational costs required by this program will be far outweighed by the overwhelming public benefits."
Environmentalists, residents and port drivers in other cities who have mounted a similar effort in their communities to enact an LA style comprehensive clean-up policy want Members of Congress to examine how the deregulation of port trucking, like that of the financial sector, has been a disaster for highway safety, air quality and on job quality.
The Coalition for Clean & Safe Ports is a partnership of environmental, public health, labor, faith and community organizations that promote sustainable economic development at West Coast ports. We are working to make the Port trucking system more efficient, reduce air pollution, improve the quality of jobs and stimulate greater economic opportunities for residents living in surrounding port communities.
For more information visit: http://www.cleanandsafeports.org/ or http://www.oakland.cleanandsafeports.org/ ¿ The Coalition for Clean & Safe Ports in LA/LB and Oakland is an alliance of over 80 organizations, including:
Alameda County Public Health Department ¿ Alameda Labor Council, AFL-CIO ¿American Lung Association of California ¿ Asian Pacific Environmental Network ¿ Clergy & Laity United for Economic Justice (CLUE) ¿ Coalition for Clean Air ¿ Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles ¿ Coalition for a Safe Environment ¿ Communities for a Better Environment ¿ Communities for Clean Ports ¿ East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy ¿ East Bay Community Law Center ¿ East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice ¿ Engineers and Architects Association ¿ Harbor Watts Economic Development Corporation ¿ Hermandad Mexicana Latinoamericana ¿ Interfaith Committee for Worker Justice ¿ Long Beach Alliance for Children with Asthma ¿ Long Beach Community Partners Council ¿ Long Beach Greens ¿ Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy ¿ Los Angeles/Long Beach Labor Coalition ¿ Mexican American Political Association ¿ National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Carson/Torrance (NAACP) ¿ Natural Resources Defense Council ¿ Oakland ACORN ¿The Pacific Institute ¿ Physicians for Social Responsibility ¿ Progressive Christians Uniting ¿ San Pedro Democratic Club ¿ Sierra Club Harbor Vision Taskforce ¿ West Oakland Environmental Indicators Project ¿ Workforce Collaborative ¿ Change to Win ¿ L.A. County Federation of Labor ¿ UNITE HERE ¿ IAM Lodge 1484 ¿ IBEW Local 11 ¿ ILWU Locals 6, 10, 34, 75 ¿ International Brotherhood of Teamsters ¿ SEIU ¿ Southern California Council of Laborers
|SOURCE Coalition for Clean & Safe Ports|
Copyright©2009 PR Newswire.
All rights reserved