Navigation Links
Overcoming structural uncertainty in computer models
Date:4/1/2014

Philadelphia, PA--A computer model is a representation of the functional relationship between one set of parameters, which forms the model input, and a corresponding set of target parameters, which forms the model output. A true model for a particular problem can rarely be defined with certainty. The most we can do to mitigate error is to quantify the uncertainty in the model.

In a recent paper published in the SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification, authors Mark Strong and Jeremy Oakley offer a method to incorporate judgments into a model about structural uncertainty that results from building an "incorrect" model.

"Given that 'all models are wrong,' it is important that we develop methods for quantifying our uncertainty in model structure such that we can know when our model is 'good enough'," author Mark Strong says. "Better models mean better decisions."

When making predictions using computer models, we encounter two sources of uncertainty: uncertainty in model inputs and uncertainty in model structure. Input uncertainty arises when we are not certain about input parameters in model simulations. If we are uncertain about true structural relationships within a modelthat is, the relationship between the set of quantities that form the model input and the set that represents the outputthe model is said to display structural uncertainty. Such uncertainty exists even if the model is run using input values as estimated in a perfect study with infinite sample size.

"Perhaps the hardest problem in assessing uncertainty in a computer model prediction is to quantify uncertainty about the model structure, particularly when models are used to predict in the absence of data," says author Jeremy Oakley. "The methodology in this paper can help model users prioritize where improvements are needed in a model to provide more robust support to decision making."

While methods for managing input uncertainty are well described in the literature, methods for quantifying structural uncertainty are not as well developed. This is especially true in the context of health economic decision making, which is the focus of this paper. Here, models are used to predict future costs and health consequences of options to make decisions for resource allocation.

"In health economics decision analysis, the use of "law-based" computer models is common. Such models are used to support national health resource allocation decisions, and the stakes are therefore high," says Strong. "While it is usual in this setting to consider the uncertainty in model inputs, uncertainty in model structure is almost never formally assessed."

There are several approaches to managing model structural uncertainty. A primary approach is 'model averaging' in which predictions of a number of plausible models are averaged with weights based on each model's likelihood or predictive ability. Another approach is 'model calibration', which assesses a model based on its external discrepancies, that is, output quantities and how they relate to real, observed values. In the context of healthcare decisions, however, neither of these approaches is feasible since typically more than one model is not available for averaging, and observations on model outputs are not available for calibration.

Hence, the authors use a novel approach based on discrepancies within the model or "internal discrepancies" (as opposed to external discrepancies which are the focus of model calibration). Internal discrepancies are analyzed by first decomposing the model into a series of subunits or subfunctions, the outputs of which are intermediate model parameters that are potentially observable in the real world. Next, each sub-function is judged for certainty based on whether its output would equal the true value of the parameter from real-world observations. If a potential structural error is anticipated, a discrepancy term is introduced. Subsequently, beliefs about the size and direction of errors are expressed. Since judgments for internal discrepancies are expected to be crude at best, the expression of uncertainty should be generous, that is, allowed to cover a wide distribution of possible values. Finally, the authors determine the sensitivity of the model output to internal discrepancies. This gives an indication of the relative importance of structural uncertainty within each model subunit.

"Traditional statistical approaches to handling uncertainty in computer models have tended to treat the models as 'black boxes'. Our framework is based on 'opening' the black box and investigating the model's internal workings," says Oakley. "Developing and implementing this framework, particularly in more complex models, will need closer collaboration between statisticians and mathematical modelers."


'/>"/>

Contact: Karthika Muthukumaraswamy
karthika@siam.org
267-350-6383
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
Source:Eurekalert  

Related medicine news :

1. “Tips on How to Overcome Fear of Failure,” A New Article on Vkool.com, Share Useful Tips with Readers on Overcoming the Fear of Failure - V-kool
2. Overcoming Emotional Eating
3. How “Reveal The Thin Within” Helps People Get Rid Of Fat – V kool
4. Lynn Gauthier Offers Personal Stories of Overcoming Vanity
5. Diabetes drug points the way to overcoming drug resistance in melanoma
6. Joe Jones, Personal Trainer to Seva Call Founder Shares Tips on Overcoming Gym Intimidation
7. Overcoming resistance to anti-cancer drugs by targeting cell powerhouses
8. New finding gives clues for overcoming tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer
9. Unprecedented structural insights: NMDA receptors can be blocked to limit neurotoxicity
10. Washington University and Barnes-Jewish Heart Specialists Hold CME Event: Top Advancements in the Treatment of Structural Heart Disease
11. Nobles Medical Technologies II's NobleStitch EL Receives Strong Reviews from Physicians at Congenital & Structural Interventions Congress (CSI) in Frankfurt
Post Your Comments:
*Name:
*Comment:
*Email:
Related Image:
Overcoming structural uncertainty in computer models
(Date:6/25/2016)... Oklahoma (PRWEB) , ... June 25, 2016 , ... ... both athletes and non-athletes recover from injury. Recently, he has implemented orthobiologic procedures ... Oklahoma City area —Johnson is one of the first doctors to perform the ...
(Date:6/24/2016)... ... ... June 19, 2016 is World Sickle Cell Observance Day. In an effort ... holistic treatments, Serenity Recovery Center of Marne, Michigan, has issued a pain ... Disease (SCD) is a disorder of the red blood cells, which can cause episodes ...
(Date:6/24/2016)... CA (PRWEB) , ... June 24, 2016 , ... Comfort ... the American Cancer Society and the Road To Recovery® program to drive cancer patients ... seniors and other adults to ensure the highest quality of life and ongoing independence. ...
(Date:6/24/2016)... Nevada (PRWEB) , ... June 24, 2016 , ... ... Vegas client, The Grove Investment Group (TGIG), has initiated cultivation and processing operations ... in Las Vegas and Pahrump, Nevada. , Puradigm is the manufacturer of a ...
(Date:6/24/2016)... ... June 24, 2016 , ... Advanced Plastic Surgery Institute ( ... as its official Medspa Sponsor. Dr. Josh Olson, a board-certified plastic surgeon, owns ... Dr. Olson says the decision to support the pageant in an official capacity ...
Breaking Medicine News(10 mins):
(Date:6/23/2016)... Roche (SIX: RO, ROG; OTCQX: RHHBY) announced ... BRAHMS PCT (procalcitonin) assay as a dedicated testing solution ... this clearance, Roche is the first IVD company in ... sepsis risk assessment and management. PCT is ... levels in blood can aid clinicians in assessing the ...
(Date:6/23/2016)... Capricor Therapeutics, Inc. ... company focused on the discovery, development and commercialization ... in its ongoing randomized HOPE-Duchenne clinical trial (Halt ... its 24-patient target. Capricor expects the trial to ... 2016, and to report top line data from ...
(Date:6/23/2016)... , June 23, 2016 Bracket , a ... its next generation clinical outcomes platform, Bracket eCOA (SM) ... on June 26 – 30, 2016 in Philadelphia ... electronic Clinical Outcome Assessment product of its kind to fully ... Bracket eCOA 6.0 is a flexible platform for ...
Breaking Medicine Technology: