Navigation Links
Mammograms May Not Be Fool-Proof at Catching Second Cancers

By Kathleen Doheny
HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, Feb. 22 (HealthDay News) -- In women who have had breast cancer, annual mammograms help detect second breast cancers, but they're not as effective in women who have never had the disease, new research suggests.

"Screening mammography does work well in women with a history of breast cancer, so they should continue to get their annual screening mammogram," said Diana Miglioretti, senior investigator at Group Health Research Institute in Seattle and a co-author of the new research. "But they also need to remain vigilant because they are at increased risk of cancers not detected on mammography that show up between mammograms."

In their study, published in the Feb. 23 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, Miglioretti and her colleagues found that false positives and interval cancers were both higher in women with a history of breast cancer than in those without such history. False positives are an initial finding of cancer that turns out to be benign based on additional testing. Interval cancers are those found between mammograms, either through additional tests or symptoms.

The researchers evaluated 12 years of data from 58,870 screening mammograms in 19,078 women with early-stage breast cancer and an equal number of mammograms in another 55,315 women who had never had breast cancer. The women were matched on such factors as age and breast density, a risk factor for cancer, with higher density increasing risk.

Within a year of the screening, 655 cancers were found in women with a breast cancer history and 342 in those without.

Mammograms had detected 76.5 percent of the cancers in women who had never had breast cancer and 65.4 percent in those who had previously had the disease. As for false positives, 1 percent of the women without a history of breast cancer were referred for biopsy but ended up being cancer-free, compared with 1.7 percent of those with a breast cancer history.

The interval cancer rate was 3.6 per 1,000 screenings in those with a history and 1.4 per 1,000 in those without, the investigators found.

Women with a history of breast cancer were also more likely to be called back for additional imaging or biopsies: 18 percent called back, compared with 8.3 percent of the others.

"I think it's mostly positive news," Miglioretti said. "Of the ones that are missed, most of them are early stage." It points to the need, she said, for women to remain vigilant about screening after their breast cancer treatment -- and to report any symptoms to their doctor immediately.

Dr. William Audeh, medical director of the Samuel Oschin Cancer Center and the Wasserman Breast Cancer Risk Reduction Program at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, described the findings as "not at all surprising." He reviewed the study but was not involved in it.

After surgery and radiation, he said, a woman's breasts have changed, and there is a greater chance that a radiologist will think that something is abnormal simply because of the changes. "That helps explain the false positives," Audeh said.

And though mammography did not catch all cancers in the women with a breast cancer history, the study still points out the value of the test, he said.

Robert Smith, director of cancer screening for the American Cancer Society, agreed.

"Despite poorer performance compared with women without a prior history of breast cancer, overall screening mammography was effective at detecting the majority of breast cancer in women with a [history] at an early favorable stage, with the majority of tumors being diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ or stage 1," Smith said.

A trend among cancer specialists, Audeh said, is to tailor follow-up for a woman who has had breast cancer. For those who have dense breasts and are younger than 50, for example, "we can alternate mammograms with breast MRIs," with one of the tests every six months, he said.

More information has more on mammograms.

SOURCES: Diana Miglioretti, Ph.D., senior investigator, Group Health Research Institute, Seattle; William Audeh, M.D., medical oncologist and medical director, Samuel Oschin Cancer Center and Wasserman Breast Cancer Risk Reduction Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles; Robert A. Smith, Ph.D., director, cancer screening, American Cancer Society, Atlanta; Feb. 23, 2011, Journal of the American Medical Association

Copyright©2010 ScoutNews,LLC.
All rights reserved  

Related medicine news :

1. Time to raise how many mammograms radiologists must read?
2. Yearly mammograms from age 40 save 71 percent more lives, study shows
3. Damage of False-Positive Mammograms Overlooked: Study
4. Women with false-positive mammograms report high anxiety and reduced quality of life
5. Only Half of Women Over 40 Get Annual Mammograms
6. Breast CT imaging system marches forward as pain-free tool to aid mammograms
7. Annual Mammograms May Cut Mastectomy Rate for Some
8. British Study Supports Mammograms for Some Women Under 50
9. Cancer Risk From Radiation of Mammograms Is Slight: Study
10. Latest Findings Back Mammograms for Women in Their 40s
11. Mammograms Save Lives for Women in Their 40s, Study Says
Post Your Comments:
Related Image:
Mammograms May Not Be Fool-Proof at Catching Second Cancers
(Date:11/30/2015)... (PRWEB) , ... November 30, ... ... (AIS) is pleased to announce the speakers for “Value-Based Payer-Provider Partnerships: Three ... learned from three innovative value-based care arrangements: Essentia Health and UCare, MissionPoint ...
(Date:11/30/2015)... ... November 30, 2015 , ... ... DataTrade Solutions Inc., a Healthcare IT consulting, development and support company. The purchase ... technical experience available within DataTrade to extend the services currently provided by Healthjump. ...
(Date:11/30/2015)... (PRWEB) , ... November 30, ... ... ), a leading provider of enterprise Time and Attendance/Workforce Management cloud-based ... in the Microsoft Partner Program with competencies in the Application Development, demonstrating ...
(Date:11/30/2015)... , ... November 30, 2015 , ... ... 2016. In 2016, expected coding changes are likely to include new codes for ... It’s not easy to understand the effects of code changes in musculoskeletal, radiology ...
(Date:11/29/2015)... Birmingham, Lake Orion, Clarkston, Metamora, Michigan (PRWEB) , ... ... ... Women's Excellence is once again accredited by the American Institute ... peer review process that allows practices to demonstrate that they meet or ...
Breaking Medicine News(10 mins):
(Date:11/30/2015)... Nov. 30, 2015  Novartis will demonstrate the strength ... th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting. ... as well as supportive care, including key findings in ... cell therapies. The ASH Annual Meeting will be held ... Novartis Oncology . "We will be presenting ...
(Date:11/30/2015)... BOSTON , November 30, 2015 ... new medicines directed at up to 10 G protein-coupled ... PFE ) to research and develop potential new ... (GPCR) targets across multiple therapeutic areas. --> ... and development company and wholly-owned subsidiary of Sosei Group ...
(Date:11/30/2015)... , November 30, 2015 ... or the "Company") announced today that it was informed by ... and Drug Safety (MFDS) has approved its Exablate Neuro ... --> --> Insightec,s Exablate ... treatment alternative that combines two technologies: Focused Ultrasound, which ...
Breaking Medicine Technology: