The secondary endpoints of the study evaluated maintenance of remission and relapse rates over 12 months. In the efficacy population at entry (month 0), 78.1 percent of patients (n=219) in the once-daily group and 82.3 percent of patients (n=232) in the twice-daily group were in clinical and endoscopic remission. At month 12, 64.4 percent of patients in the once-daily and 68.5 percent of patients in the twice-daily group were in strictly defined clinical and endoscopic remission (P=0.351). Thus, there was no significant difference between the once-daily and twice-daily groups with respect to strictly defined clinical and endoscopic remission at month 12. Further, 88.9 percent and 93.2 percent of patients in each group, respectively, had maintained clinical remission and were considered "relapse-free".
Study Background
A total of 459 patients were enrolled and randomized in the 303
long-term safety study (246 directly from the parent studies 301 and 302 --
Lialda's eight-week, Phase III, placebo-controlled trials that demonstrated
efficacy for the induction of remission in active, mild to moderate UC --
and 213 patients who received an additional 8 weeks of treatment with
Lialda 4.8 g/day to induce remission). Remission was defined using
stringent clinical and endoscopic measures: modified UC Disease Activity
Index (UC-DAI) score of less than or equal to 1, with scores of 0 for
rectal bleeding and stool frequency, and a combined Physician's Global
Assessment and
'/>"/>
| SOURCE Shire Limited Copyright©2008 PR Newswire. All rights reserved |