Navigation Links
Linagliptin: Once again, no proof of added benefit
Date:1/30/2013

Linagliptin (trade name Trajenta) has been approved since August 2011 to improve blood glucose control in adults with type 2 diabetes. The assessment of the new dossier according to the German Act on the Reform of the Market for Medicinal Products (AMNOG) again showed that no added benefit of the drug over the appropriate comparator therapy (ACT) can be determined, because the pharmaceutical company has not submitted any relevant studies. This is the conclusion of the report by the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) published on 3rd December 2012.

First assessment negative because the comparator therapy deviated from the one specified

In its first early benefit assessment dated January 2012, IQWiG was unable to determine any added benefit because the pharmaceutical company (Boehringer Ingelheim) had chosen sitagliptin as comparator therapy in its first dossier instead of the ACT (a sulfonylurea) specified by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA). A decision based on the IQWiG report was made by the G-BA on 29th March 2012.

Company can submit a new dossier in the transitional period

On the basis of an exemption clause since enshrined in the German Social Code Book V (35a Paragraph 5b), during a transitional period up to the end of 2012, companies are allowed to apply for a new assessment at any time if the added benefit is considered unproven due to incomplete evidence. The G-BA decided to allow a corresponding application for linagliptin and commissioned IQWiG to assess the new dossier submitted by the company. Linagliptin is the first drug to be re-assessed according to this rule.

Approval status distinguishes between three treatment situations

The ACT (the sulfonylureas glibenclamide and glimepiride) specified by the G-BA differs according to which of three treatment situations applies: firstly, where linagliptin is given alone (monotherapy) as a substitute for metformin if the latter is not tolerated by patients or should not be taken because of impaired kidney function. In this case of monotherapy, the G-BA states that linagliptin is to be compared with a drug from the sulfonylurea class.

The second situation is dual therapy in which linagliptin is combined with metformin. This combination is indicated if treatment with metformin alone is insufficient to control blood glucose levels. In the case of such dual therapy with linagliptin, the added benefit is to be assessed in comparison with the combination of metformin and a sulfonylurea (glibenclamide or glimepiride).

The third situation is triple therapy in which a combination of linagliptin, metformin and a sulfonylurea is given. This is indicated if dual therapy of metformin and a sulfonylurea does not provide adequate treatment. The ACT for triple therapy was specified by the G-BA as a combination of human insulin and metformin.

Direct comparison with placebo is not sufficient

For monotherapy and triple therapy, the company did not submit any studies that tested linagliptin against the ACT. Although it presented the results of placebo-controlled studies in its dossier as supplementary information, in this case, however, the direct comparison with a dummy drug (placebo) is not suitable for proving an added benefit of one drug over another treatment.

Furthermore, the company also did not cite any studies that could be used for an indirect comparison. For methodological reasons, it did not consider that an indirect comparison could be carried out for the triple therapy.

The only study on dual therapy compared two treatment strategies

The company listed one study on dual therapy in which glimepiride and linagliptin - each combined with metformin - were tested against each other. In principle, this study could have been relevant. However, it did not simply compare two drugs with each other, but two different treatment strategies as well: whereas the glimepiride dose in the first phase of the study was to be adjusted (i.e. increased) until a near-normal level of blood glucose (HbA1c) was reached, no definite target value was specified in the linagliptin group. It is therefore unclear whether possible differences in the treatment results are attributable to the drugs or the treatment strategy, i.e. the unilateral specification of a target value. This study is therefore also unsuitable for deriving an added benefit.

Intensive reduction in blood glucose can increase the risk of strokes

Although it is not relevant for the assessment of the added benefit of linagliptin, this study nevertheless provided important information: in the first phase of the study, in which the blood glucose levels in the glimepiride group were rapidly reduced to the desired near-normal range, not only was the number of hypoglycaemic episodes (times when blood glucose was too low) increased, but also the number of serious cerebral events, i.e. strokes, was far higher than in the comparator group, in which no target blood glucose value was specified.

"The results show once again that an intensive reduction in blood glucose values is achieved at the expense of substantial risks to health", commented Jrgen Windeler, the Director of IQWiG. "Furthermore, this result is to be attributed to the different treatment strategies rather than the drugs".

G-BA decides on the extent of added benefit

The dossier assessment is part of the overall procedure for early benefit assessments supervised by the G-BA. After publication of the manufacturer's dossier and IQWiG's assessment, the G-BA conducts a commenting procedure, which may provide further information and result in a change to the benefit assessment. The G-BA then decides on the extent of the added benefit, thus completing the early benefit assessment.


'/>"/>

Contact: Anna-Sabine Ernst
presse@iqwig.de
49-221-356-850
Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care
Source:Eurekalert

Related medicine news :

1. To make old skin cells act young again, boost their surroundings, U-M scientists show
2. No Proof Drugs Ease Kids Migraines: Study
3. Corporate Whistle Blower Center Now Urges Physicians Medical Device and Drug Industry Insiders To Step Up-If They Have Proof Of Serious Wrongdoing or Overbilling
4. Pesticides and Parkinsons: UCLA researchers uncover further proof of a link
5. Corporate Whistle Blower Center Now Urges Physicians to Become a Whistleblower if They Have Proof a Medical Device or a Drug Product was Defective-and it was Sold Anyway
6. Corporate Whistle Blower Center Now Urges Physicians, Medical Device or Drug Insiders With Proof A Company Knowingly Sold A Bad Product to Become a Whistleblower
7. No Proof That Doping With EPO Gives Athletes an Edge: Review
8. Vandetanib in thyroid cancer: No proof of added benefit
9. No proof that patients lose weight after joint replacement surgery
10. More Proof Cranberry Juice Thwarts Infection
11. More Proof That Healthy Habits Fight Disease
Post Your Comments:
*Name:
*Comment:
*Email:
(Date:4/25/2017)... ... April 25, 2017 , ... Amendia, Inc., designer, ... its strategic partnership with and platinum sponsorship of Global Spine Outreach (“GSO”), a ... effective management of complex spine deformity cases, particularly in children. , GSO’s focus ...
(Date:4/24/2017)... Lake City, UT (PRWEB) , ... April 24, 2017 , ... ... their efforts to encourage sustainability, innovate new strategies to reduce waste, and support renewable ... herbal remedy provider. They look to nature to find solutions for health issues, and ...
(Date:4/24/2017)... , ... April 24, 2017 , ... The California Dental ... in charitable dental services to 1,961 people during the April 22-23 event at the ... charge to Californians who experience barriers to care, CDA Cares educates the public and ...
(Date:4/24/2017)... ... April 24, 2017 , ... ... seeking public support to bring their novel lifesaving device for the everyday use ... with medical-grade sensors, specially designed to read a child’s vital signs, and detect ...
(Date:4/24/2017)... CA (PRWEB) , ... April 24, 2017 , ... ... brain tumors are expected to be diagnosed globally; approximately 25,000 of them will ... are anticipating greater use of this type of healthcare model in the diagnosis ...
Breaking Medicine News(10 mins):
(Date:4/20/2017)... 20, 2017 Research and Markets has announced ... Driven by Rapidly Expanding Injectables Market and Increasing Usage of Complex ... ... technologies will rise from USD 20 Billion in 2015 to around ... Delivery Technologies - Innovation Driven by Rapidly Expanding Injectables Market and ...
(Date:4/20/2017)... Research and Markets has announced the addition of the ... Outlook, Growth Trends, Key Players, Competitive Strategies and Forecasts, 2014 ... ... US$ 7,167.6 Mn in 2015, and is expected to reach ... 5.6% from 2016 to 2024. The global ...
(Date:4/19/2017)... VANCOUVER , April 19, 2017 /PRNewswire/ - CRH Medical Corporation (TSX: CRH) ... the Bloom Burton & Co. Healthcare Investor Conference 2017 at the ... Edward Wright , Chief Executive Officer of the Company is ... Company,s CFO, Richard Bear and the Chairman of the ... ...
Breaking Medicine Technology: