Judge Rejects Quigley's Claims - Karkus Director Candidates Prevail in Fed...( WOODMERE N.Y. May 18 /- The United S...),Health

WOODMERE, N.Y., May 18 /PRNewswire/ -- The United States District Court issued a decision and order Friday afternoon rejecting The Quigley Corporation's (Nasdaq: QGLY) attempt to prevent Ted Karkus, Mark Burnett, John DeShazo, Mark Frank, Louis Gleckel, MD, Mark Leventhal, and James McCubbin ("the Shareholder Nominees") from continuing their efforts to allow Quigley's shareholders to choose whether to vote to replace the current board.

The Federal Court's decision followed a hearing on the Company's assertions. The Company had launched a court battle in an effort to block the Shareholder Nominees from soliciting your vote. As a result of the Court's ruling on Friday, all shareholders remain free to vote for change by voting on the lightly shaded BLUE Voting Instruction Form for the highly qualified slate of Shareholder Nominees.

The annual meeting is just two days away. To help you decide on how to vote, we have provided our thoughts on some important questions all shareholders should consider regarding the actions of Guy Quigley and the incumbent directors, and the Court's findings:

Question: How Did The Court Rule On The Company's Claims That (1) The Shareholder Nominees Had Not Accurately Described The Darius/Innerlight/Gary Quigley Transactions and (2) The Shareholder Nominees Have "Undisclosed Plans" Concerning the Company?

Answer: The Company Voluntarily Withdrew Both of These Claims As A Basis For a Preliminary Injunction.

Explanation: In our proxy materials and our other communications with you we told you about the Darius/Innerlight/Gary Quigley transactions. The Company sued us, claiming that our prior statements to you on this topic were not accurate -- even though
'/>"/>