Navigation Links
Hospitals misleading patients about benefits of robotic surgery, study suggests
Date:5/18/2011

An estimated four in 10 hospital websites in the United States publicize the use of robotic surgery, with the lion's share touting its clinical superiority despite a lack of scientific evidence that robotic surgery is any better than conventional operations, a new Johns Hopkins study finds.

The promotional materials, researchers report online in the Journal for Healthcare Quality, overestimate the benefits of surgical robots, largely ignore the risks and are strongly influenced by the product's manufacturer.

"The public regards a hospital's official website as an authoritative source of medical information in the voice of a physician," says Marty Makary, M.D., M.P.H., an associate professor of surgery at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and the study's leader. "But in this case, hospitals have outsourced patient education content to the device manufacturer, allowing industry to make claims that are unsubstantiated by the literature. It's dishonest and it's misleading."

In the last four years, Makary says, the use of robotics to perform minimally invasive gynecological, heart and prostate surgeries and other types of common procedures has grown 400 percent. Proponents say robot-assisted operations use smaller incisions, are more precise and result in less pain and shorter hospital stays claims the study's authors challenge as unsubstantiated. More hospitals are buying the expensive new equipment and many use aggressive advertising to lure patients who want to be treated with what they think is the latest and greatest in medical technology, Makary notes.

But Makary says there are no randomized, controlled studies showing patient benefit in robotic surgery. "New doesn't always mean better," he says, adding that robotic surgeries take more time, keep patients under anesthesia longer and are more costly.

None of that is apparent in reading hospital websites that promote its use, he says. For example he points out that 33 percent of hospital websites that make robot claims say that the device yields better cancer outcomes a notion he points out as misleading to a vulnerable cancer population seeking out the best care.

Makary and his colleagues analyzed 400 randomly selected websites from U.S. hospitals of 200 beds or more. Data were gathered on the presence and location of robotic surgery information on a website, the use of images or text provided by the manufacturer, and claims made about the performance of the robot.

Forty-one percent of the hospital websites reviewed described the availability and mechanics of robotic surgery, the study found. Of these, 37 percent presented the information on the homepage and 66 percent mentioned it within one click of the homepage. Manufacturer-provided materials were used on 73 percent of websites, while 33 percent directly linked to a manufacturer website.

When describing robotic surgery, the researchers found that 89 percent made a statement of clinical superiority over more conventional surgeries, the most common being less pain (85 percent), shorter recovery (86 percent), less scarring (80 percent) and less blood loss (78 percent). Thirty-two percent made a statement of improved cancer outcome. None mentioned any risks.

"This is a really scary trend," Makary says. "We're allowing industry to speak on behalf of hospitals and make unsubstantiated claims."

Makary says websites do not make clear how institutions or physicians arrived at their claims of the robot's superiority, or what kinds of comparisons are being made. "Was robotic surgery being compared to the standard of care, which is laparoscopic surgery," Makary asks, "or to 'open' surgery, which is an irrelevant comparison because robots are only used in cases when minimally invasive techniques are called for."

Makary says the use of manufacturer-provided images and text also raises serious conflict- of-interest questions. He says hospitals should police themselves in order not to misinform patients. Johns Hopkins Medicine, for example, forbids the use of industry-provided content on its websites.

"Hospitals need to be more conscientious of their role as trusted medical advisers and ensure that information provided on their websites represents the best available evidence," he says. "Otherwise, it's a violation of the public trust."


'/>"/>

Contact: Stephanie Desmon
sdesmon1@jhmi.edu
410-955-8665
Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions
Source:Eurekalert

Related medicine news :

1. Thomas Jefferson University and hospitals tasked to find new radiation drugs
2. Black cardiac arrest patients more likely to be admitted to hospitals with lowest survival rates
3. Studies Highlight Challenge of Controlling Resistant Bacteria in Hospitals
4. Referral to high-volume hospitals for operations fails to improve outcomes statewide
5. Hospitals Urged to Check for Depression Before Discharging Heart Patients
6. University Hospitals Case Medical Center testing innovative heat therapy for premature ejaculation
7. Use of Virtual Colonoscopy on the Rise in U.S. Hospitals
8. Experts call for greater pain assessment in hospitals as 65 percent of patients report problems
9. Study finds blacks more likely to be readmitted to hospitals after discharge
10. Elsevier/MEDai enhances real-time clinical surveillance system for hospitals
11. University Hospitals system-approach to stroke care increases the use of tPA therapy by 13.5-fold
Post Your Comments:
*Name:
*Comment:
*Email:
(Date:12/8/2016)... (PRWEB) , ... December 08, 2016 , ... ... Donuts Franchising Company LLC, announced the first national #QuackGivesBack campaign which supported ... , “This was our first franchise-wide Quack Gives Back initiative, and ...
(Date:12/8/2016)... ... ... CURE Media Group, the nation’s leading digital and print media enterprise focused ... in efforts to combat lung cancer, announced CURE Media Group President Michael J. Hennessy, ... is honored to team up with Upstage Lung Cancer in order to make major ...
(Date:12/8/2016)... ... December 08, 2016 , ... SunView ... customers and employees that are both engaging and easy to use. Coming off ... the software company revealed today its plans to roll out new AI-powered self-service ...
(Date:12/8/2016)... ... , ... STAT courier is pleased to announce that due to customer demand, ... expanding their presence in Dallas. One of the most exciting parts for STAT is ... the Dallas and Forth Worth market. STAT takes pride in treating their employees with ...
(Date:12/8/2016)... ... 08, 2016 , ... Vida Health, the digital health platform that ... Canvas Ventures . Other investors include Nokia Growth Partners (NGP) and returning investor ... more consumers who are managing chronic conditions or simply want to improve ...
Breaking Medicine News(10 mins):
(Date:12/8/2016)... Dec. 8, 2016  EIP Pharma, LLC ( ... proof-of-mechanism for neflamapimod (previously code named VX-745), with ... clinical trials that demonstrated significant Alzheimer,s disease relevant ... treatment) and Study 303 (6-week treatment) are the ... Alzheimer,s Disease (CTAD) scientific conference in ...
(Date:12/8/2016)... A Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) grant ... (NIH) to Phoenix -based NeuroEM Therapeutics, ... grant will seek to determine an optimal set of ... waves to treat Alzheimer,s Disease. The grant will also ... treat other neurologic disorders such as Parkinson,s Disease and ...
(Date:12/8/2016)... New York , December 8, 2016 ... global Diabetes Injection Pens Market is expected to ... compared to US$4.9 bn in 2015. Between the forecast years ... rise at a CAGR of 7.9%. The leading players operating ... A/S, Eli Lilly and Company, AstraZaneca plc., Biocon Ltd., and ...
Breaking Medicine Technology: