Millions of women across this nation have made the same complaint as Mrs. Acuna: that they are given false and misleading factual information about what is evacuated in the abortion procedure. They suffer profoundly when they learn, as Mrs. Acuna did, the truth after it is too late. For them, they have lost something of great value, which was dismissed as mere tissue.
There is no question, and there can be no credible dispute, that the procedure performed upon Mrs. Acuna terminated the life of a member of the species Homo sapiens. Mrs. Acuna, and other pregnant mothers in her circumstance, are entitled to know that fact before they make a decision for themselves of whether or not to submit to the procedure.
This simple biological fact should not be confused with the separate question of whether or not Mrs. Acuna would personally place any special value on the life of that member of the species under all her circumstances. Advising Mrs. Acuna that he was evacuating nothing but "mere tissue" (or some blood) strips Mrs. Acuna of her own authority and ability to make an informed decision for herself. This is so because she was deprived of the opportunity to make a reasoned and informed decision because she was not given the biological facts essential for her to make that decision in a truly informed way.
The language employed in Roe v. Wade by the U.S. Supreme Court -
concerning "when life begins" - continues to confound and confuse even the
most sophisticated inferior courts. Perhaps, it is now time for that Court
to cor
'/>"/>
| SOURCE Harold J. Cassidy & Associates Copyright©2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved |