Navigation Links
Health care incentive model offers collaborative approach
Date:8/17/2007

A major focus in the search for accountability in the U.S. health care system is new reimbursement and benefit models that provide incentives better linked to positive health outcomes. A recent study found some valuable lessons from a model in Maine that tied some degree of risk and reward for both health care providers and employer/purchasers.

The call of accountability in the U.S. health care system has spun off hospital report cards, reimbursement reforms and heightened expectations about the roles of patients and health care providers, in an attempt to address problems of healthcare access, quality and costs, said co-author Dennis Scanlon, associate professor of health policy and administration at Penn State.

While financial incentives seem obvious and techniques such as commissions and bonuses are used in other industries, the health care arena is really in the infancy of testing models of more rational payment, Scanlon adds.

Several high-profile programs include the CMS Premier Hospital pay-for-performance (P4P) demonstration, the IHA P4P initiative in California, the Bridges to Excellence program and the New York State Medicaid Health Plan incentive program. But like all efforts, each has advantages and disadvantages that are worth considering, says the Penn State researcher.

Many efforts have been developed by large insurance companies and have focused on performance measures based on various factors ranging from clinical and financial statistics to patient input, notes Scanlon.

Typical pay-for-performance (P4P) programs pay health care providers for meeting certain performance standards as an incentive reward. But a key question is the source of the reward dollars. Some analysts believe that health care providers also should put some of their compensation dollars at risk if they achieve low levels of performance on quality and efficiency measures.

The Maine Health Management Coalition comprises public and private employers who purchase health care from insurance companies that ultimately pay doctors, hospitals and physicians, and other health care providers. It established the Pathways to Excellence program, which developed an initiative for measuring, identifying and rewarding high-value hospitals in the state.

The goal was to develop and test a shared incentive model where both healthcare providers and payers would each face risk and reward.

The six-month, pilot program involved several hospitals and employers in the Coalition. They identified and adopted 22 measures in four categories: patient satisfaction, patient safety, clinical effectiveness, and efficiency.

The participating hospitals and employers set aside a small percentage of the money paid in routine health care payments and reimbursements for employee care, in a special fund, Each employer paid half of one percent what it paid to the hospital in employee health care last year, into a Bonus fund. Each hospital set aside half of one percent of the health care payments from participating employers into a Guarantee fund.

Two performance criteria were set up: Guarantee and Bonus Levels assigned to certain activities.

A hospital would earn points if meeting or exceeding Guarantee and Bonus levels for each activity in the four categories. It would earn no points for failing to meet those same levels. The final scores for Guarantee and Bonus levels would determine how much a hospital would receive or refund money to the special fund.

In the study, six of the 10 participating hospitals received additional payments exceeding their Guarantee funds, averaging $14,941 per hospital. The additional money came from a portion of the Bonus funds and a refund from those hospitals whose combined scores failed to return all their Guarantee funds.

The remaining four hospitals received an average payment of $3,629 in Guarantee funds and no Bonus funds, according to the study.

Employers as a group paid a total Bonus amount of $75,129 to the six qualifying hospitals. The average was $8,348 per employer.

While the dollar amount is modest, the redistribution of payments engaged both groups in a key collaboration, Scanlon says. This initiative was an attempt to bring together hospitals and employers and see if they can come to an agreement on a program that benefits both parties by creating an incentive for improvement.

Hospitals were seeking recognition for their current investments in quality improvement and believed that additional resources would be needed to achieve superior improvement, he added. Employers felt that higher quality care should reduce health care costs, and additional payments should go only to superior performance. In post-study interviews, both groups felt the main benefit was sending a signal to large health plans about their desire for standardized and understandable performance factors and uniform rewards based on those factors, according to the Penn State researcher.

While the pilot study involved a small amount of money in reality, the program if applied to the billions of dollars spent in Medicare and Medicaid services could impact millions of dollars in hospital funding and employere reimbursements.

One goal of the study was to see if a different approach to health care funding was even possible, Scanlon says. Such a collaboration could pave the way for changes in how employers pay for health care and how hospitals are reimbursed, with stronger incentives and risk for both sides.


'/>"/>

Contact: Vicki Fong
vyf1@psu.edu
814-865-9481
Penn State
Source:Eurekalert

Related medicine news :

1. Poor health care in Russia maybe causing Decline in its Population
2. Startling Expose – Physicians Often Have No Regular Source Of Health Car
3. Debate Rages over firing of HIV infected health care workers
4. Want a Healthy brew? Have some Tea!
5. Patient’s perception of health status helps in better recover
6. Antioxidants protect health tissue in people undergoing radiation therapy.
7. Sexual abuse affect health for a lifetime
8. Smoking a greater risk than HIV? Yes say health experts!!!!
9. Healthcare sector is now a multi billion-dollar industry in India
10. Exclusive breast-feeding advised for six months in infants recommends World Health Organization
11. How much can exercise improve health?
Post Your Comments:
*Name:
*Comment:
*Email:
(Date:4/28/2016)... ... April 28, 2016 , ... One way to ignore solid evidence is to ... But we toss the baby out with the bathwater when we ignore all studies ... higher-quality studies and otherwise making better use of education policy research. , “When readers ...
(Date:4/28/2016)... ... April 28, 2016 , ... The American Society ... Anzu®, developers of the AnzuMedical™ Knowledge Sharing and Collaboration Platform™ , today ... The platform is scheduled to launch in July 2016 and will be a ...
(Date:4/28/2016)... ... ... A first-time look at workers’ compensation claims in Kentucky found that total costs ... (WCRI) announced, and that costs per claim were stable between 2009 and 2014. ... that indemnity costs per claim and benefit delivery expenses per claim were typical of ...
(Date:4/28/2016)... ... April 28, 2016 , ... Metabolic Nutrition ... at this week’s 2016 Europa Games Get Fit and Sports Expo in ... the Europa Orlando Expo coming up April 29-30, was selected as the perfect event ...
(Date:4/28/2016)... St. Louis, MO (PRWEB) , ... April 28, 2016 , ... Denise McCormick Baich had ... stanza, in 2009 the poetry arrived again much like a tsunami and took on a ... people closest to her encouraged her to do more with it than just file it ...
Breaking Medicine News(10 mins):
(Date:4/27/2016)... April 27, 2016 Tie-up with ... initiative to save newborns   Fortis ... & newborns in collaboration with Breast Milk Foundation (BMF), a ... Pasteurized Human Milk Bank, ,Amaara, in Delhi-NCR today. This non-profit ... source for infants and should be available to babies deprived ...
(Date:4/27/2016)... FRANCISCO , April 27, 2016 ... reach over USD 2.14 billion by 2022, according ... Inc.       (Logo: http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20150105/723757 ... technological advancement affecting the efficiency and accuracy delivered ... the persistent demand for novel urinalysis instruments and ...
(Date:4/26/2016)... 26, 2016 US demand for infection ... 4.9 percent annually to $27.6 billion in 2020.  ... to decrease rates of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) will ... and services.  Although declining, the overall rate of ... levels set by the CDC.  Recent statistics indicate ...
Breaking Medicine Technology: