Navigation Links
Federal Judge Strikes Down Health Reform Law
Date:12/14/2010

MONDAY, Dec. 13 (HealthDay News) -- A federal judge ruled Monday that the new U.S. health-care reform law is unconstitutional, saying the federal government has no authority to require citizens to buy health insurance.

That provision is a cornerstone of the new legislation, signed into law in March by President Barack Obama.

The judge's decision was not unexpected, and both supporters and opponents of the legislation anticipate the validity of the new health law ultimately will be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

The ruling was handed down by U.S. District Judge Henry E. Hudson, a Republican appointed by President George W. Bush who had seemed sympathetic to the state of Virginia's case when oral arguments were heard in October, the Associated Press reported.

Last week, White House officials said a negative ruling would not affect the implementation of the law because its major provisions don't take effect until 2014, the AP reported. The legislation was a Democratic initiative championed by Obama, and remains unpopular with Republicans.

Virginia Attorney General Kenneth Cuccinelli, a Republican, had filed a lawsuit in defense of a new Virginia law barring the federal government from requiring state residents to buy health insurance. He argued that it is unconstitutional for the federal law to force citizens to buy health insurance and to assess a penalty if they don't.

The U.S. Justice Department said the insurance mandate falls within the scope of the federal government's authority under the Commerce Clause. But Cuccinelli said deciding not to buy insurance is an economic matter outside the government's domain.

Hudson became the first federal judge to strike down a key part of the health law, which had been upheld by federal judges in Virginia and Michigan. Several other lawsuits have been dismissed and others are pending, including one filed in Florida by 20 states, according to the AP.

By 2019, the law, unless changed, will expand health insurance access to 94 percent of non-elderly Americans. Advocates say that between now and then, it will also provide consumers with many new rights and protections.

Key provisions include:

  • Health insurance plans may no longer deny coverage to people based on pre-existing health conditions.
  • Health plans that cover dependents must permit children to stay on a parent's family policy until age 26.
  • Insurers may no longer place lifetime dollar limits on essential benefits.
  • New health plans must offer preventive services such as mammograms and colon cancer screenings without charging a deductible, co-payment or coinsurance. (This provision does not apply to existing plans that are "grandfathered.")

Reaction to the judge's ruling was divided, with opponents of the law pleased while backers were dismayed.

The mandate that consumers buy insurance or pay a penalty marked the first time Americans have been required by the federal government to purchase a commercial product, said Devon Herrick, a senior fellow at the National Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas.

Requiring people to carry insurance takes away an individual's freedom of choice, he said, agreeing with the judge's decision to strike down that provision of the law.

"According to the judge, this dispute is about an individual's right to choose to participate," Herrick said. "One reason why individual choice is important is that the health insurance policies individuals will be required to purchase are saddled with mandated benefits and mandated providers that drive up the cost of coverage."

"Moreover, the cost of this mandated health coverage will grow at twice rate of the nation's income. It doesn't make sense to require individuals to purchase a product they cannot afford and fine them when they fail to purchase it," he said.

DeAnn Friedholm, director of Consumers Union's health reform campaign, said: "This is a case that will likely wind up in the Supreme Court, since other courts have ruled in favor of the new health law. This law, while not perfect, finally protects American consumers against the worst practices of the health insurance industry. Until there is a final decision, we will continue to work hard to educate consumers about what is really in the health law and how they can get the best benefits from the system for their family's health and pocketbook."

More information

To learn more about the impact of the Affordable Care Act, visit this U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Web site.

SOURCES: Devon Herrick, Ph.D., senior fellow, the National Center for Policy Analysis, Dallas; Dec. 13, 2010, news release, Consumers Union, Washington, D.C.; Associated Press


'/>"/>
Copyright©2010 ScoutNews,LLC.
All rights reserved  

Related medicine news :

1. Stricter testing for federal ground beef program may not lead to safer meat
2. University of Colorado gets federal award for Cord Blood Bank
3. Report shows federal poverty guidelines leave states seniors destitute
4. Health IT program at the University of Texas at Austin receives $2.7 million in federal funding
5. Gold Standard/Elsevier first to launch state, federal controlled substance drug schedules
6. Canada needs health-care leadership at federal level
7. Internists outline comprehensive federal strategy to control tobacco use
8. APS urges greater federal investment in energy research
9. National Nursing Centers Consortium Responds to New Federal Investment in Nurse-Managed Health Clinics
10. Federal Agencies to Study Causes of Firefighters' Cancers
11. Talecris Biotherapeutics Hires Nimish Shah as Vice President, Federal Government Relations
Post Your Comments:
*Name:
*Comment:
*Email:
Related Image:
Federal Judge Strikes Down Health Reform Law 
(Date:3/28/2017)... ... March 28, 2017 , ... Calibration, qualification, and the appropriate ... and maintaining GMP and USP compliance. In a new webinar from METTLER TOLEDO ... " these requirements are explained. The challenge is to determine how to ...
(Date:3/28/2017)... ... March 28, 2017 , ... ... release of two biometric time and attendance tracking products: the new NCheck Cloud ... NCheck Cloud Bio Attendance uses biometric face recognition to enable users to check ...
(Date:3/28/2017)... ... March 28, 2017 , ... In its ongoing effort ... has recently developed and published an informational resource that addresses frequently asked questions. ... common inquiries the site’s team of third party administrator (TPA) contributors regularly receives ...
(Date:3/28/2017)... ... March 28, 2017 , ... A minimally invasive ... “perfect smile.” The National Association of Dental Laboratories (NADL) is informing dentists about ... aware of when utilizing dental laboratories and technicians that create these veneers. ...
(Date:3/28/2017)... ... March 28, 2017 , ... Public relations pros work hard to earn ... business channels. , While many results are clear, much of PR is hard to ... When it comes to measurement, firms should always take an all-inclusive approach that takes ...
Breaking Medicine News(10 mins):
(Date:3/27/2017)... 2017 The National University of Singapore ... analytics company, signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) ... in the region. Under this ... and Technology (BIGHEART) at NUS and Holmusk will ... to healthcare IT and medical device development. These ...
(Date:3/27/2017)... 27, 2017 Summary This ... Eli Lilly and its partnering interests and activities since 2010. ... provides an in-depth insight into the partnering activity of one ... demand company reports are prepared upon purchase to ensure inclusion ... The report will be delivered in PDF format ...
(Date:3/27/2017)... Wis. , March 27, 2017  A recent ... of only four freestanding hospitals in the country dedicated ... plastic and reconstructive surgery, concluded that the Surfacide Helios ... and integral component in reducing bacterial pathogens not killed ... findings were published at the American Burn Association,s 49th ...
Breaking Medicine Technology: