Navigation Links
Federal Court Rules FDA Must Reconsider Plan B Decision

FDA Ordered to Make a Decision Based on Scientific Fact, Not Politics

NEW YORK, March 23 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Today, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York rejected the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) decision to limit over-the-counter access to the emergency contraceptive Plan B to women over 18, ruling that it was based on politics and ideology, rather than science. The court ordered the agency to reconsider its decision. It also ordered the FDA to act within 30 days to extend over-the-counter access, which is currently limited to 18 year olds and over, to 17 year olds.

"Today's ruling is a tremendous victory for all Americans who expect the government to safeguard public health," said Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, which brought the suit against the FDA.

"The message is clear -- the FDA should put medical science first and leave politics at the lab door. We are encouraged that the agency, now under new leadership, will take that message to heart."

The Center for Reproductive Rights sued the FDA in 2005 for failing to grant over-the-counter status to Plan B against the advice of scientific experts and in violation of its own procedures and regulations. In 2006, the FDA agreed to make Plan B available without a prescription, but only to women over 18 and only behind the pharmacy counter. The Center continued to pursue its lawsuit, Tummino v. von Eschenbach, to ensure that Plan B would be granted true over-the-counter status and made available to all women, including young women who might benefit most from this form of contraception.

"According to the FDA's own rules, the only legitimate criteria for making a drug available without a prescription are safety and efficacy," said Northup. "Emergency contraception is proven safe and effective and today, all women -- including young women for whom the barriers and the benefits are so great -- are one step closer to having the access they need and deserve."

The Court found that the FDA "acted in bad faith and in response to political pressure," "departed in significant ways from the agency's normal procedures," and engaged in "repeated and unreasonable delays." In addition, the court found that the FDA's justification for denying over-the-counter access to 17 year olds "lacks all credibility," and was based on "fanciful and wholly unsubstantiated 'enforcement' concerns."

Before its action on Plan B, the FDA had never restricted a non-prescription drug based on a person's age, nor had the Bush Administration ever been consulted by the FDA about an over-the-counter drug application. Depositions of senior FDA officials by the Center in 2006 indicated that the Bush Administration sought to unduly influence the agency during the Plan B application review process. Testimony also indicated that officials involved in the decision-making process were concerned about losing their jobs if they did not follow the Administration's political directives.

Other evidence uncovered during the lawsuit showed that the agency repeatedly departed from its own established procedures during the FDA case, from filling the reproductive health committee with political "operatives" to making a decision to reject over-the-counter access to Plan B before completion of the standard review.

The Center's battle to make Plan B available over-the-counter to women of all ages began in 2001, when it filed a citizens' petition with the FDA on behalf of over 70 medical and public health organizations to grant the drug over-the-counter status. On January 21, 2005, the Center filed Tummino v. von Eschenbach in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York on behalf of the Association of Reproductive Health Professionals (ARHP); National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health; individuals from a grassroots advocacy group, the Morning-After Pill Conspiracy; and parents who seek over-the-counter access for their daughters. On March 30, 2007, the Center asked for summary judgment in the case, arguing that the evidence gathered during discovery made it unnecessary for the court to hold a trial and that the court should order the agency to make Plan B available without a prescription to all women.

For more information on this case and the Center for Reproductive Rights, please visit

The Center for Reproductive Rights is a nonprofit legal advocacy organization dedicated to promoting and defending women's reproductive rights worldwide.

    CONTACT: Dionne Scott
    (917) 733-4357

    Liza Tanner
    (202) 207-3645

SOURCE Center for Reproductive Rights
Copyright©2009 PR Newswire.
All rights reserved

Related medicine news :

1. MDMA Names New Director of Federal Affairs
2. Federal research plan to determine nanotech risks fails to deliver
3. Federal Employee Program Maintains Low Health Premiums In 2008
4. AMERIGROUP Contracts with Federal Government to Offer Medicare Advantage Health Plans in Seven States
5. SNM applauds NAS study showing need to restore federal nuclear medicine research funding
6. ACM Helps Medicaid Programs Comply With Federal Deficit Reduction Act Mandates
7. Boise(R) BEWARE(TM) Meets New Federal Guidelines Set Forth by Medicaid
8. HIV/AIDS Cases Among State and Federal Prison Inmates Fell for the Sixth Straight Year During 2005
9. Bristol-Myers Squibb Finalizes Settlement of Previously Disclosed Federal Investigation into Pricing, Sales and Marketing Practices
10. Federal Trade Commission Attempts To Suppress Best-Selling Authors First Amendment Rights
11. CPF Urges Congress to Increase Funding for IPF Research in 2009 Federal Budget
Post Your Comments:
(Date:11/24/2015)... ... 2015 , ... Young patients with a wide variety of dental needs can ... S. Lele, who are pediatric dentists in Tucson, AZ . Unlike traditional treatment ... system causes minimal discomfort and bleeding to the patient during treatment and the following ...
(Date:11/24/2015)... ... November 25, 2015 , ... ... solutions for drugs, biologics, consumer health and global clinical supply services, today announced ... upcoming Clinical Trial Supply East Asia Conference, to be held at the InterContinental ...
(Date:11/24/2015)... ... 24, 2015 , ... It takes only three to five seconds to make ... the first impression be positive and reflects business values. If a client starts with ... want to return. They will also share their thoughts about a business with others, ...
(Date:11/24/2015)... (PRWEB) , ... November 24, 2015 , ... ... advisory organization, is pleased to welcome Winter-Dent & Company as its newest Partner ... day one to become a client's most trusted advisor regardless of whether that ...
(Date:11/24/2015)... , ... November 24, 2015 , ... Serenity Point Rehabilitation, ... series of recent video interviews with some of the staff members at their recovery ... residential treatment facility, as well as some of the things that make their recovery ...
Breaking Medicine News(10 mins):
(Date:11/24/2015)... and BERN, Switzerland , November ... ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research of the University ... Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition of the ... start of an exclusive collaboration to develop a novel ... for the personalised delivery of insulin for diabetic patients ...
(Date:11/24/2015)... FLINT, Mich. , Nov. 24, 2015 Diplomat ... , Senior Vice President of Clinical Services, Education and Human ... (AIS) online webinar, "Oral Oncology Drugs: Health Plan Strategies for ... co-presenting with Beckie Fenrick , a consultant with the ... The webinar will ...
(Date:11/24/2015)... , Nov. 24, 2015 iRhythm Technologies, Inc. , ... care, today announced that it will participate in the 27th Annual ... New York, NY . Kevin King ... Tuesday December 1, 2015 at 8:50am ET. ... . --> . --> ...
Breaking Medicine Technology: