Waltham, MAA new report issued today by The Access Project and Brandeis University found that farm and ranch operators, like many Americans, are seriously challenged by the cost of health care. While the vast majority of farm and ranch operators had insurance coverage, one in four said that health care costs contributed to financial problems for their families. The report, How Farmers and Ranchers Get Health Insurance and What They Spend for Health Care, shows a link between how farm and ranch operators get coverage and the amount of their overall healthcare expenses.
The report found that farm and ranch operators are far more likely to purchase coverage on the individual market than the population at large. It cautions that families forced to rely on this market may have no alternative but to pay high premiums for policies that also include significant deductibles, thus resulting in high overall costs for those who experience illness. Research has also shown that Americans delay seeking care due to medical costs and steep insurance premiums.
Family farmers and ranchers struggling to maintain their operations are not well-served by the current health insurance marketplace, said Carol Pryor, lead author of the report and Senior Policy Analyst at The Access Project. We found that those purchasing coverage directly on the individual market pay the highest premiums for coverage that often leaves them financially exposed.
Todays report is the second in a series of issue briefs based on a 2007 survey of farm and ranch operators in seven Great Plains states: Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota. The Access Project and its partners at Brandeis University and the University of North Dakota School of Medicines Center for Rural Health contracted with the USDAs National Agricultural Statistics Service to survey more than 2,000 non-corporate farm and ranch operators (those operating as sole proprietors or partnerships).
Findings from the report include:
Many people are being forced to make the choice between getting jobs off the farm or ranch to get more affordable insurance, or else they need to use money to pay for medical bills that could otherwise be invested in farm or ranch operations, explained Dr. Alana Knudson, Associate Director for Research at the Center for Rural Health, University of North Dakota School of Medicine, and a co-author of the study, Either way, the profitability of their businesses is hurt, which has an impact on the overall economy.
Tim Peterson, a soybean and corn farmer from Rembrandt, Iowa purchases coverage on the individual market. Tim and his family have spent a significant part of their household income in health care costs for the past few years. He and his wife Teresa have separate policies due to her pre-existing health conditions which make her virtually ineligible for comprehensive coverage. Medical costs make it impossible for our family to save money, said Mr. Peterson. This past year we spent over $6,000 in premiums and another $10,000 in out of pocket expenses. The presidential candidates talk about the health care crisis, but its really a health cost crisis.
High health care costs that plague family farmers almost certainly also affect other small rural businesses, said Dr. Jeffrey Prottas, of Brandeis University and a report co-author. These finding may only be the tip of the iceberg. Other rural Americans may be finding it even harder to find quality affordable health care.
The finding that people paying high premiums were much more likely to have obtained coverage in the individual, non-group market raises concerns regarding policy proposals that look to the individual market as a means to expand coverage. The report states that policymakers may need to recognize that reliance on the private, individual market to expand insurance coverage cannot by itself provide a solution. Rather, to fashion effective solutions, they may need to combine elements that include cost-sharing assistance, market controls to restrain costs and maintain quality, consumer protections, and greater access to existing government-sponsored health care programs.
|Contact: Laura Gardner|