erland hospital,
"was seriously flawed," according to McCaughey, "rendering its findings
insignificant." In that previous study, many patients were not tested until
they had been in the hospital twelve hours, and test results were delayed
an average of 22.5 hours after that --- a 34.5 hour delay overall. In fact,
41% of patients had already had their surgeries, before their test results
were known. Consequently, the precautions, including isolation, that are
supposed to be taken in response to an MRSA positive result, were not
taken. The delay allowed the germ to spread to other patients.
"The evidence is overwhelming that hospitals cannot effectively prevent
the spread of MRSA bacteria if they don't know which patients carry these
germs," says McCaughey. "Screening saves lives. The federal Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention should call on all hospitals to screen
incoming patients for MRSA."
'/>"/>SOURCE Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths Copyright©2008 PR Newswire. All rights reserved | |
Page: 1 2 Related medicine news :1.
MTM Study Reports Improved Quality and Economic Outcomes Using Medication Management Systems Assurance Pharmaceutical Care System(TM)2.
New Healthcare Study Outlines Strategies to Increase Adoption of Home Health Monitoring Technologies3.
Neighborhoods play key role in how much people exercise, study says4.
Study Analyzed Long-Term SYMBICORT(R) Use in Children With Persistent Asthma5.
Cancer detected earlier, faster, with new medical imaging, Stanford study finds6.
Study Finds Potential Cause of Age-Related Macular Degeneration7.
New Study: Pycnogenol(R) Improves Memory in Elderly8.
Researchers study new drug and indications for heated chemotherapy treatment9.
Scripps research team wins $4M grant to study effects of chronic marijuana use10.
Meditation impacts blood pressure, study shows11.
Mayo Clinic study shows Parkinsons disease drug might work in cancer patients