Navigation Links
Documenting women's experiences with chromosome abnormalities found in new prenatal test
Date:9/21/2012

PHILADELPHIA We often hear that "knowledge is power." But, that isn't always the case, especially when the knowledge pertains to the health of an unborn child, with murky implications, at best. A new study, led by researchers from the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, begins to document this exception to the general rule.

Barbara Bernhardt, MS, CGC, a genetic counselor at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, and colleagues contacted a small group of women who are participating in a larger Columbia University study investigating the use of a genetic test called a DNA microarray to identify the possibility of prenatal chromosomal abnormalities. Bernhardt is also co-director of the Penn Center for the Integration of Genetic Healthcare Technologies.

The study's goal: To document a woman's experience upon learning that her child's genetic material contained chromosomal abnormalities. The women's responses to this type of news were mostly negative, ranging from saying they "needed support" after getting the results to describing the results as "toxic knowledge," that they wish they hadn't received.

DNA microarrays represent a relatively new approach to genetic testing. Classically, chromosomal abnormalities are detected with karyotyping, which uses DNA staining and microscopy to identify such large-scale abnormalities as trisomy 21, associated with Down's syndrome. Yet the technique lacks the resolution to detect smaller yet still significant -- chromosomal changes.

That's where DNA microarrays come in. Microarrays use an array of DNA "probes" to search for matching bits of DNA from across the genome. In theory, if a piece of DNA is missing or duplicated, that change can be detected on a microarray, even if it is too small to be detected by karyotyping.

DNA microarrays are often used by physicians following birth to identify chromosomal abnormalities in children with unexplained developmental delays or congenital defects. However, the technique is also being applied prenatally. The problem, though, unlike some genetic changes that definitely lead to disease, is that the significance of the changes DNA microarrays identify (called copy-number variants) isn't always clear. Nor is it necessarily obvious what actions parents, doctors, and genetic counselors should take in light of the findings.

Bernhardt set out to document the experiences of women receiving such information. Of the 4,450 women enrolled in the Columbia University trial, Bernhardt and her team selected 54 who had received chromosome microarray results that showed abnormalities in the previous six months. Of those, they interviewed 23 regarding the subjects' recollections of their informed-consent discussions, genetic counseling, test results, and follow-up.

The team identified five "key elements" that describe the women's experiences:

"An offer too good to pass up." Many of the women accepted the offer for testing because it was offered at no cost and posed no additional risk to them or their unborn child. Yet they did so without necessarily considering the potential significance and ambiguity of the information they could receive.

"Blindsided by the results." Women reported being caught off-guard by the microarray data, which generally arrived one to two weeks after preliminary (and seemingly normal) karyotype information.

"Uncertainty and unquantifiable risks." Women had difficulty making sense of the test results, as copy-number variants are often of either uncertain clinical significance, or produce a wide array of possible developmental outcomes. As a result, the women's time-critical and emotionally charged decisions about whether to terminate a pregnancy, for instance, were complicated.

"Need for support." The women reported needing support from counselors, spouses or partners to digest and consider the information they had received and to make critical decisions regarding their pregnancies.

"Toxic knowledge." The women noted that in many cases the array results constituted "toxic knowledge" that they, in retrospect, wish they hadn't learned, because it negatively impacted their pregnancy, birth, and postnatal experiences. As Bernhardt describes it, "They watch their babies like hawks, always waiting for the other shoe to drop."

According to Bernhardt, chromosomal microarrays pose the same ambiguities after birth as prenatally. The difference is that postnatal testing is done because the child already exhibits an unexplained abnormality, and physicians hope the test can pinpoint its cause. "But when you find [an abnormality] in a fetus it puts the woman and couple into a tailspin because they have no clue what to expect," she says. "And the couple is immediately faced with whether or not to terminate the pregnancy."

The take-home message, Bernhardt says, is that genetic counselors must be prepared to spend more time with parents to help them explore their reasons for wanting microarray testing. Counselors also need to emphasize to parents the potentially ambiguous nature of the microarray results, how to consider potential responses, and how to make the best decisions they can based on both available scientific data and the clients' beliefs.

The study, "Women's experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results," was published online September 6 in the journal Genetics in Medicine. Additional authors include Penn researcher Danielle Soucier; as well as Karen Hanson, Melissa Savage, and Ronald Wapner from Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; and Laird Jackson, Drexel University College of Medicine.


'/>"/>

Contact: Karen Kreeger
karen.kreeger@uphs.upenn.edu
215-349-5658
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
Source:Eurekalert

Related medicine news :

1. Source of conflict: Study finds factors that can shape divorced mothers co-parenting experiences
2. Are women with a history of violent experiences more likely to have risky sex?
3. Mutations impair childhood growth and development by disrupting organization of chromosome pairs
4. Warwick scientists uncover how checkpoint proteins bind chromosomes
5. Brain Scans of Hoarders Show Unique Abnormalities
6. Gene Mutation Linked to Facial, Skull Abnormalities
7. Genome-wide analysis shows previously undetected abnormalities in parents of affected children
8. Treatment of childhood OSA reverses brain abnormalities
9. Genetic abnormalities in benign or malignant tissues predict relapse of prostate cancer
10. Insecticide Linked to Brain Abnormalities in Kids
11. Epilepsy Leads to More Brain Abnormalities Over Time
Post Your Comments:
*Name:
*Comment:
*Email:
(Date:2/23/2017)... Boston, MA (PRWEB) , ... February 23, 2017 ... ... Education and Department of Justice jointly issued a letter to withdraw ... in accordance with their gender identity. The guidance issued in May 2016 by ...
(Date:2/23/2017)... ... February 23, 2017 , ... The American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association ... Annual Meeting. KLS is a longtime supporter of the event. , "We are ... Platinum Sponsor," said Dr. Bob Havlik, 2017 ACPA President. "KLS Martin has a long ...
(Date:2/23/2017)... ... February 23, 2017 , ... EBSCO Information ... National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) framework. The agreement ... Health Service (NHS) to search, order and purchase medical and healthcare-related content through ...
(Date:2/23/2017)... ... February 23, 2017 , ... ERT, a global data and ... Premier Research, a leading clinical development service provider, has selected ERT’s Trial Oversight ... due in part to an array of circumstances including the use of multiple ...
(Date:2/23/2017)... ... (PRWEB) February ... for the nation to come together to combine its favorite ... with its favorite fruit – apples! To celebrate National Nutrition ... join the “Apple Madness” bracket tournament – a five-week, five-round ...
Breaking Medicine News(10 mins):
(Date:2/23/2017)... , Feb 23, 2017 Research and Markets ... Price Analysis and Strategies - 2016" report to their offering. ... The latest ... provides drug pricing data and benchmarks in the global Autism Spectrum ... What are the key drugs marketed for Autism ...
(Date:2/23/2017)...  Cogentix Medical, Inc. (NASDAQ: CGNT), a medical device ... for the urology market, will release financial results for ... 2016 before the market open on Thursday, March 9, ... conference call and webcast to discuss its financial results ... 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time (10:00 a.m. Central Time). ...
(Date:2/23/2017)... Research and Markets has announced the addition of ... to their offering. ... latest research Menopause Drugs Price Analysis and Strategies - 2016, provides drug ... answers the following questions: What are the ... positioned in the Global Menopause market? What are the ...
Breaking Medicine Technology: