Navigation Links
Breast cancer screening: No added value through mammography
Date:2/26/2010

This release is available in German.

Do we need a revision of current recommendations for breast cancer screening? According to a recent prospective multicenter cohort study published in the "Journal of Clinical Oncology", this appears advisable at least for young women carrying an increased risk of breast cancer. The results of the EVA trial confirm once more that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is substantially more accurate for early diagnosis of breast cancer than digital mammography or breast ultrasound: MRI is three times more sensitive for breast cancer than digital mammography. For the EVA trial, almost 700 women were enrolled. Aim of the trial was to refine existing guidelines for surveillance of women at high and moderately increased risk of breast cancer. Findings suggest that in these women, MRI is essential for early diagnosis and that a mammogram or an ultrasound examination does not increase the "cancer yield" compared to what is achieved by MRI alone. Researchers conclude that annual MRI is not only necessary, but in fact sufficient for screening young women at elevated risk of breast cancer. In women undergoing screening MRI, mammograms will have no benefit and should be discontinued. Moreover, MRI screening is important not only for women at high risk, but also for those at moderately increased risk. (doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0839).

Between 2002 and 2007, the EVA trial recruited 687 women who carried a moderately increased risk of breast cancer (lifetime risk of 20% and over). Women underwent 1679 screening rounds consisting of annual MRI, annual digital mammography and half-annual screening ultrasound examinations. During this time span, 27 women received a new diagnosis of invasive cancer or DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ).

Of all imaging methods under investigation (digital mammography, ultrasound and MRI), MRI offered by far the highest sensitivity: MRI identified 93% of breast cancers. 37% of cancers were picked up by ultrasound. The lowest sensitivity was achieved by digital mammography, which identified only one-third of breast cancers (33%). These results confirm once more that MRI is essential for surveillance not only of women at high risk, but also for women at moderately increased risk of breast cancer. Moreover, the results contradict current guidelines according to which mammography is considered indispensable for breast cancer screening. One aim of the EVA trial was to question this concept and to ask whether it is still appropriate to require that MRI should only be used in addition to mammography. The results speak for themselves: If an MRI is available, then the added value of mammography is literally negligible. Researchers conclude that MRI is necessary as well as sufficient for screening young women at elevated risk of breast cancer. Since mammography appears to be unnecessary in women undergoing MRI, its use is no longer justifiable, and current guidelines should be revised to reflect this.

Current guidelines questionable

Current guidelines for women at high familial risk of breast cancer recommend annual MRI (with or without ultrasound) and annual MRI starting at age 25-30. "These guidelines were set up based on little or no scientific evidence, and mainly reflect expert opinion", summarizes Prof. Christiane Kuhl, radiologist at the University of Bonn and principal investigator of the EVA trial. "In the light of the results of the EVA trial, such recommendations should be revisited". This seems even more important because digital mammography uses x-rays (ionizing radiation) to detect breast cancer. "The radiation dose associated with regular mammographic screening is clearly acceptable and safe", underscores Kuhl. "However, regular mammographic screening usually starts at age 40-50". The situation is different if systematic annual mammographic screening is started at age 25-30. "Not only because these women will undergo more mammograms and therefore will experience a cumulative lifetime radiation dose that will be substantially higher, but also because the breast tissue of young women is more vulnerable to the mutagenic effects of radiation". This appears to be especially true for BRCA mutation carriers. "Accordingly, we impose more radiation on less radiation-tolerant breast tissue for a very limited, if any, diagnostic benefit". Therefore, Kuhl advocates a revision of existing guidelines: "It is no longer justifiable to insist on annual mammographic screening women in their thirties if they have access to screening MRI".

MRI is a mature technology

In the past, MRI was used strictly in addition to mammography only. The allegedly high rate of "false positive" diagnoses and the allegedly insufficient sensitivity for DCIS were the main reason to discourage its use as a stand-alone method for breast cancer screening. "In this multicenter trial, with basic quality assurance implemented not only for mammography, but also for MRI, we were able to prove that false positive diagnoses are avoidable if MRI studies are interpreted with adequate radiologist expertise". In the EVA cohort, the Positive Predictive Value achieved with MRI was already even higher than that of mammography or breast ultrasound. "Moreover, we found that MRI offered the highest sensitivity especially for DCIS", adds Dr. Kuhl. "It is simply wrong to state that we need a mammogram to detect intraductal cancer".


'/>"/>

Contact: Professor Dr. Christiane Kuhl
kuhl@uni-bonn.de
49-228-287-19875
University of Bonn
Source:Eurekalert

Related medicine news :

1. Bitter Melon Extract May Slow, Stop Breast Cancer
2. Bitter melon extract decreased breast cancer cell growth
3. Bitter melon extract attacks breast cancer cells
4. Scott & White Healthcare pathologist is co-investigator on breast cancer study
5. Combined mammography and breast MRI useful for some high-risk women
6. How to make the best decisions when at high risk for breast or ovarian cancer
7. Dips in Breast Cancer Rates Seen Most in Affluent Women
8. Aspirin May Boost Breast Cancer Survival
9. GUMC researchers say flower power may reduce resistance to breast cancer drug tamoxifen
10. Study reveals genetic link between mammographic density and breast cancer
11. Cancer publishes study confirming disparity in breast cancer treatment
Post Your Comments:
*Name:
*Comment:
*Email:
(Date:4/27/2017)... ... April 27, 2017 , ... The ... Rewards, and Recognition: A Nudge Guide," a groundbreaking analysis of how behavioral economics ... takeaways to apply immediately to IRR programs, the report highlights proven behavioral economics ...
(Date:4/27/2017)... ... April 27, 2017 , ... Last night, Christine Collins ... the Year for her extraordinary compassion and lifelong dedication to serve others. Since ... caregivers for the prestigious award each year – identifying a CAREGiver who has ...
(Date:4/27/2017)... ... , ... Are you investing in the safety of your friends and family? ... summer. While most of us assume this type of accident will never happen to ... are taking the time to learn how to respond effectively or prevent these accidents ...
(Date:4/26/2017)... (PRWEB) , ... April 26, 2017 , ... Journal ... adults. It can have severe consequences to overall dental health, including complications with speech, ... often turn to dental implants to replace lost teeth. As the number of tooth ...
(Date:4/26/2017)... ... April 26, 2017 , ... Elisabete Miranda, president and ... by Enterprising Women magazine as one of its 2017 Enterprising Women of the ... Winners have demonstrated that they have fast-growth businesses, mentor or actively support other ...
Breaking Medicine News(10 mins):
(Date:4/20/2017)... , April 20, 2017 Eyevensys, ... the first non-viral gene expression technology that enables the ... eye to address a wide range of ophthalmic diseases, ... and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) to advance its ... ...
(Date:4/19/2017)... 19, 2017 The Mobile X-Ray product segment is ... CAGR during the forecast period Mobile X-Ray segment ... digital mobile X-Ray devices market, which is estimated to be ... at a CAGR of 7% over the forecast period. Mobile ... more than US$ 100 Mn in 2017 over 2016. The ...
(Date:4/19/2017)... April 19, 2017 The Global Effective ... to 2022 report has covered and analysed the potential of ... on market size, shares and growth factors. The report identifies ... and opportunities in the global market. ... Browse 152 Tables and Figures, 6 Major Company ...
Breaking Medicine Technology: