Copenhagen, Denmark, Friday 12 June 2009: Patients with rheumatic diseases want more information and better communication with healthcare professionals on the sexual issues related to their conditions, according to the results of a new study presented today at EULAR 2009, the Annual Congress of the European League Against Rheumatism in Copenhagen, Denmark.
However, a second study shows that, although nurses understand the importance of addressing sexual health with their rheumatology patients as an integral part of their care, the nurses' own embarrassment in having such conversations can hinder them in proactively raising the issue.
The sexual relationships of people with rheumatic diseases can be impaired not only by physical symptoms, such as pain, fatigue and disability, but also by feelings of self consciousness and discomfort. Historically, poor communication between patients and healthcare professionals and a lack of clinical guidelines about the effects of rheumatic diseases on sexual issues, have hindered the resolution of such problems.1-3
In the first qualitative study of 23 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, the respondents reported that sexual issues or relationships, in the context of their rheumatic disease, had not been part of their rheumatological healthcare, but they nonetheless considered it a relevant topic that should be included. Furthermore, a lack of information given on the potential sexually-related side effects of medication, such as erectile dysfunction and reduced libido, was identified. When reporting to their rheumatologist, the male patients reported a lack of knowledge or interest in such potential side effects from their healthcare professional.
The patients in the study believed that sexual issues should be addressed as part of the rheumatic healthcare, but sufficient time and an individually adjusted approach were required. A need for variation in information sources and settings for the communication on sexual issues was identified, such as individual conversations with a health professional, group sessions and written material. A simple screening and referral to appropriate and trained staff for specific time to raise sexually related questions was also suggested, together with a need for basic information about possible disease-related effects on sexual-related areas. The patients wanted their healthcare professionals to be better informed and aware of sexual issues and the impact on their relationships, in relation to rheumatological conditions.
In the second study, qualitative interviews with six rheumatology nurses identified four key categories experienced in the management of sexual issues in rheumatology practice:
Nurses agreed that the first two themes, where the patient takes the lead, are situations that can lead to embarrassment, but that it is still preferable to them that the patient proactively raises the topic themselves. The latter two themes, where the nurse takes the lead, are situations in which nurses often choose not to share their professional experiences with the patient and not to follow their intuition, as they do not always feel that experience and intuition are sufficient to initiate a conversation on sexual issues.
Mrs Lene Sigaard of the Copenhagen University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark, who conducted the nurse (second) study, said: "Nurses are uniquely positioned to raise the subject of sex with their rheumatology patients, explaining the reasons for any problems and how they might be rectified. Equipping nurses with better information about these types of problems may help them to overcome their own embarrassment and reluctance to initiate this type of dialogue. We hope that our study will contribute to the development of a professional approach towards sexual topics."
In the first patient-oriented study, from Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 19 individual semi-structured interviews and two focus group interviews were conduced with 23 rheumatology patients aged 29-66 years, mean 44 years; disease duration 2-34 years) (including those with rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, spondylarthropathy; 13 men, 10 women) who had been recruited by purposeful sampling from the in-and-out-patients clinics at Diakonhjemmet Hospital and by postal request. The development of the interview guide was informed by a literature review and discussions with a patient and healthcare professional resource group. The results are preliminary, the data have been coded, condensed and further analyses are ongoing.
In the second study of nurses, from Denmark, qualitative data was analysed on the basis of Hermeneutic Theory and inspired by Grounded Theory and Discourse Analysis, to interpret the results and identify commonalities.
|Contact: Rory Berrie|
European League Against Rheumatism