Montreal, Canada (PRWEB) June 25, 2016
Conventional wisdom preaches the benefits of moderation, whether it’s a matter of indulgence or the pursuit of success. In terms of the latter, setting the bar too high can result in disappointment, perhaps even self-loathing. However, those who set the bar too low, risk more than just slow progress toward their goal.
Research from PsychTests.com reveals that behind the tendency to set low expectations is a debilitating fear of failure, of success, of the social consequences of success, and a generally paralyzing sense of ineptitude.
Analyzing data from 16,144 people who took their Success Likelihood Test, researchers at PsychTests paid particular attention to people who set the bar high for themselves and those who set the bar low. Aside from being significantly less ambitious (average score of 34 for the low group vs. 77 for the high group, on a scale that ranges from 0 to 100), individuals with low self-expectations were also:
- Afraid to fail (score of 69 vs. 33 for the high expectations group).
- Afraid of succeeding (score of 58 vs. 24 for the high expectations group).
- Concerned about the social consequences of being a success (score of 44 vs. 27 for the high expectations group).
- More likely to have low self-esteem (score of 26 vs. 69 for the high expectations group).
- More likely to have a more limited potential for success overall (score of 40 vs. 71 for the high expectations group).
Their limited potential for success, however, is entirely self-inflicted, and appears to come from a deep-seated fear. The low expectations group essentially set themselves up for failure from the start, thwarting any chance of achievement whatsoever. For example, according to PsychTests study,
- 84% of the people in the low expectations group admit that fear and self-doubt have affected major career and life decisions (vs. 32% of the high expectations group).
- 66% shy away from any sort of competitive environment in which their skills are put to the test (vs. 14% of the high expectations group).
- 53% shy away from any goal that pushes them out of their comfort zone (vs. 6% of the high expectations group).
- 37% purposely avoid opportunity, even when it effortlessly falls into their path (vs. 2% of the high expectations group).
- 49% are afraid of standing out because of their achievements (vs. 11% of the high expectations group).
- 54% are concerned that talking about their accomplishments will make them appear arrogant (vs. 28% of the high expectations group).
- 66% constantly worry about making mistakes (vs. 30% of the high expectations group).
- 52% are afraid of losing other people’s respect if they make a mistake or fail (vs. 18% of the high expectations group).
- 61% are terrified of being criticized by others (vs. 23% of the high expectations group).
“While it seems like a foregone conclusion that setting your expectations low will guarantee success, our study shows that this isn’t the case at all,” explains Dr. Jerabek, president of PsychTests. “Even though the high expectation group had a propensity to set goals for themselves that were quite difficult to achieve, they still had a higher likelihood for success, and refused to be held back by a fear of failure or the burden of responsibility that success can bring.”
“People who set low expectations are their own worst enemy. They are not setting the bar low because they want to ‘test the waters’ or pace themselves; they are setting it low because they see the path to success as a minefield of problems. With failure comes the potential for humiliation and disappointment; with success comes the potential for jealousy or added pressure. Couple that with self-doubt and the fear of not being good enough, and what you have is one stumbling block after another. Setting the bar low – or not setting any expectations or goals at all – is a sign that there are deeper issues that are holding a person back from attaining their full potential.”
Want to assess your success potential? Check out http://testyourself.psychtests.com/testid/2138
Professional users of this test can request a free demo for the SLPro - R2 (Success Likelihood Profile - 2nd Revision) or any other assessments from ARCH Profile’s extensive battery: http://hrtests.archprofile.com/testdrive_gen_1
To learn more about psychological testing, download this free eBook: http://hrtests.archprofile.com/personality-tests-in-hr
About PsychTests.com
PsychTests AIM Inc. originally appeared on the internet scene in 1996. Since its inception, it has become a pre-eminent provider of psychological assessment products and services to human resource personnel, therapists, academics, researchers and a host of other professionals around the world. PsychTests AIM Inc. staff is comprised of a dedicated team of psychologists, test developers, researchers, statisticians, writers, and artificial intelligence experts (see ARCHProfile.com). The company’s research division, Plumeus Inc., is supported in part by Research and Development Tax Credit awarded by Industry Canada.
Read the full story at http://www.prweb.com/releases/2016/06/prweb13504003.htm.
'/>"/>
| Source: PRWeb Copyright©2016 Vocus, Inc. All rights reserved |
Related medicine news :
1. Manchester United vs. AS Roma Tickets Denver Sports Authority Field at Mile High: Ticket Down Cuts Ticket Prices for Guinness International Champions Cup Match
2. Manchester United vs. AS Roma Tickets in Denver, CO at Sports Authority Field at Mile High: Ticket Down Slashes Ticket Prices on International Champions Cup in Denver
3. Superhuman Caregivers: New Psychtests.com Study Uncovers The Distinct Personality Profile of Nurses
4. Terumo BCT and Sanquin Blood Supply Foundation Announce Completion of Patient Enrollment for PREPAReS Study
5. Study Finds DFMO Significantly Increases Survival for Children with Neuroblastoma
6. AMC Health and University of Rochester Medical Center Deploy Virtual Video Visits for Phase III Clinical Trial in Parkinson’s Disease: REACT-PD Study
7. FDA Approves Study of New Aneurysm Device Developed by Sanford Health
8. New Study Links Parkinson’s Disease Risk to Farming Regions in French Population
9. Periodontists Discuss NYU Study's Link Between Harmful Oral Bacteria and Pancreatic Cancer
10. Severe Baldness and Botched Strip Surgery Help: First Body Hair Transplant (BHT) Study Offers New Hope for FUE with Novel UGraft® System
11. New Economic Impact Study Shows U.S. Meat and Poultry Industry Represents $1.02 Trillion in Total Economic Output
| Copyright © 2003-2012 Bio-Medicine. All rights reserved. ABOUT | CONTACT US | DISCLAIMER | PRIVACY POLICY | TERMS AND CONDITIONS |  |