Navigation Links
Academies of science call for amendments to impracticable Genetic Diagnostics Act
Date:11/10/2010

Many aspects of the German Genetic Diagnostics Act (Gendiagnostikgesetz) are out of touch with the latest technology, almost impossible to implement in clinical practice, or even detrimental to the success of recognised screening tests, such as newborn screening. The Act, which came into force in February 2010, is in desperate need of amendment. This was the conclusion reached by the Academy Workgroup "Predictive genetic diagnostics as an instrument of disease prevention" of the German Academy of Sciences Leopoldina, the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities (for the Union of the German Academies of Sciences and Humanities), and the acatech - German Academy of Science and Engineering. The paper discusses all aspects of genetic testing of healthy individuals to prevent disease, including the medical, ethical, economic and legal dimensions of the issue.

"We are entering the age of genetic medicine," said the Workgroup's spokesperson, Professor Peter Propping, before going on to explain that an objective, factual discussion of the subject was important for the public and for government. Predictive genetic diagnostics involves analysing human genes to identify future disease risks. This type of test is becoming increasingly relevant because science is identifying more and more genetic variations that are linked to predispositions for specific diseases. These include a number of forms of hereditary cancers.

Scientists in the Workgroup agreed that predictive genetic testing should only be conducted at the request and in the interests of an individual. "Respect for the patients' freedom to make their own choices is essential," said Propping. The team categorically rejected eugenic ideas that aim to eliminate specific genes from the genome of an entire population or even go so far as to envision systematically "improving" the human gene pool.

The report also addressed the weaknesses and gaps in Germany's Genetic Diagnostics Act. Propping summed up the findings of the Workgroup by saying, "The Act should protect individuals. But to do so, it must offer adequate responses to questions of clinical practice." He explained that the Act must be amended to deal with the following situations:

Example 1: Newborn screening

The Act defines newborn screening, which has proven successful for decades, as universal genetic screening. This means that parents must be advised on the test prior to the blood sample being taken from their child's heel. However, nurses and midwives are not authorised to give this advice only doctors are. There is increasing evidence that in the case of home births blood samples are frequently not taken and screenings not conducted, even though this is not actually in line with the parents' wishes. As a result it is not always possible to offer sick children proper treatment, even when it is urgently required. Therefore the Act must be amended to allow nurses and midwives to advise parents on the test.

Example 2: The family dimension

The Act places higher value on patient-doctor confidentiality than it does on a doctor's duty to provide care. For example, if tests show that an individual has a treatable, autosomal dominant hereditary disease for which a causative mutation has been identified, he or she is instructed to inform relatives that they may also risk developing the disease. After all, early diagnosis makes it easier to treat many illnesses, such as hereditary forms of breast cancer and intestinal cancer. However, doctors have no powers to check whether this information is passed on within the family or whether it is, perhaps even purposefully, withheld. With this in mind, the Act should not, as a rule, accord lower priority to a doctor's duty to provide care. Doctors should be in a position to assess individual cases and decide whether to inform family members in an appropriate manner of the risks of disease when there is a definite medical benefit in doing so.

Example 3: Data storage

The Act stipulates that as a general rule, doctors must store the results of genetic tests for ten years, after which time the information must be destroyed. This rule applies unless patients request that their information be destroyed sooner or stored for longer, and data must be retained if its destruction would infringe on patient interests worthy of protection. In everyday clinical practice, these regulations are impracticable and inappropriate. It is not always possible to establish within a decade what impact the in contrast to other tests irreversible genetic findings may have at a later date. Furthermore, the realities of clinical practice make it impossible for doctors to reassess each case before the ten-year limit expires and to reach a decision on whether to keep the data or destroy it. Thus, the Act should remove limitations on how long results can be stored.


'/>"/>

Contact: Dr. Kathrin Happe
politikberatung@leopoldina.org
49-345-472-39862
Leopoldina
Source:Eurekalert

Related medicine news :

1. Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center research shows fish oil component given up to 5 hours after stroke limits brain damage
2. Live streaming of emerging brain science and health news
3. New research from Psychological Science
4. 20th public data release by Allen Institute for Brain Science
5. Management science guru, surviving cancer, offers hope to fellow sufferers, doctors
6. American Chemical Society co-hosts Science and Society discussion on food safety on Nov. 1
7. EMBO recognizes 63 researchers for advances in life sciences
8. Life Sciences Discovery Fund to support drug discovery, foster new R&D initiative
9. Is team science productive?
10. National Medal of Science awarded to Stephen Benkovic of Penn State University
11. UCSFs Prusiner receives Presidents National Medal of Science
Post Your Comments:
*Name:
*Comment:
*Email:
(Date:3/27/2017)... ... , ... According to the American Cancer Society , the average 15-year ... Once the cancer spreads to other organs, bones, or lymph nodes, however, the 5-year ... this latter group, tune in to Lifestyle Magazine on April 9, 2017, ...
(Date:3/27/2017)... ... March 27, 2017 , ... Sodium determination is consistently becoming ... require expert user knowledge. In a live webinar on April 11th and October ... highly accurate, determination of sodium. , It has long been known that too ...
(Date:3/27/2017)... (PRWEB) , ... March 27, 2017 , ... ... entered a settlement agreement to resolve the pending litigation between itself and 1800 ... the District of Utah). , “I am thrilled to announce that we have ...
(Date:3/27/2017)... (PRWEB) , ... March 27, 2017 , ... ... deaths soared 167%,(1) with opioids alone responsible for over 33,000 of the 52,404 ... has sponsored Assembly Bill (AB) 1512, which proposes a tax on prescription opioids ...
(Date:3/27/2017)... HOUSTON, Texas (PRWEB) , ... March 27, 2017 , ... ... and hard of hearing, is bringing its latest products to the Deaf Seniors of ... attendees will have the opportunity to meet with knowledgeable ASL friendly staff from Harris ...
Breaking Medicine News(10 mins):
(Date:3/24/2017)... A ReportsnReports.com report says, over the recent years, global antibody ... of Adcetris and Kadcyla have been witnessing rapid growth after their ... driven by large number of ADC drugs in pipeline, rise in ... ... and 94 Figures, 10 Major Company Profiles, spread across 154 pages ...
(Date:3/24/2017)... 24, 2017 Research and Markets has announced ... Business Report" report to their offering. ... The report provides separate comprehensive analytics for the US, ... Europe , Asia-Pacific , Latin America ... for the period 2015 through 2022. Also, a six-year historic analysis is ...
(Date:3/24/2017)... DALLAS , March 23, 2017  HealthMine surveys ... January 2017 revealed that health plan members want help ... reason to stay engaged in their health, 2) help ... an integrated platform for health and 5) relevant, real-time ... outcomes and lowering healthcare costs. ...
Breaking Medicine Technology: