Navigation Links
Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program


The Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program (AVIP), is the name of the policy set forth by the United States government to immunize its military and specific civilian personnel with the anthrax vaccine. It began in earnest in 1997 by the Clinton administration. Thereafter it ran into a few FDA and judicial obstacles (mainly concerning the methods and viability of the vaccine manufactured by BioPort, a subsidiary of Emergent BioSolutions Inc.).

Senior Chief Petty Officer John Payhurst administers the first in a series of anthrax vaccinations to one of 6,200 sailors aboard the aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74) on March 17, 1998. Stennis and its embarked Carrier Air Wing 7 are on station in the Persian Gulf in support of Operation Southern Watch, which is the U.S. and coalition enforcement of the no-fly-zone over Southern Iraq. Payhurst, from Virginia Beach, Va., is a Navy hospital corpsmen. The Stennis is homeported in Norfolk, Va. DoD photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Mike Larson, U.S. Navy.

Contents

History

In 1998, the Clinton administration required the inoculation of all military members[2][3], despite the fact that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning letter to the anthrax vaccine manufacturer threatening to revoke its product licenses unless immediate action was taken to correct deficiencies on March 11, 1997.[4] In June 2001, the DOD halted vaccination due to non-FDA approved changes in BioPort's manufacturing process[5].

On June 28, 2002, in the wake of the 2001 anthrax attacks and leading up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, all military personnel were required to get anthrax vaccination[6] (in addition to their other vaccinations of smallpox and other diseases and viruses like Japanese encephalitis, Pneumococcal, Tetanus, among others[7]).

While some military personnel had questions about the safety of the vaccine, it was considered a lawful order at that time, and this made refusing the vaccine at peril of the subordinate, including possible discharge (i.e., losing their job and any benefits depending on the type of discharge). This pressure, at least for the National Guard and Reserve pilots and crewmembers, became a deciding retention factor.[1]

Later that month, the DOD made it policy to include any personnel spending 15 days or more in high anthrax-risk areas, such as the Persian Gulf or the Korean peninsula.[2]

In Dec. of 2003, Judge Emmet G. Sullivan of the United States District Court in Washington ruled that the Department of Defense could not force military personnel to take the vaccine unless through a special order by the president.[3]

In October of 2004, for about 8 days in (October 20-28), anthrax vaccinations were resumed[4], but then an injunction against mandatory vaccination was filed on the basis that the BioPort Anthrax Vaccive Absorbed (AVA) was not proven to work against inhalation anthrax.[5] The ruling held that the mandatory program was illegal. The DoD was now required to either let the individual member choose under an informed consent policy, or allowed the president to bypass this requirement by executive order.[6] For military members who had started the vaccination (which usually takes build-up and booster shots), they tended to continue the vaccination program under informed consent. For those who had a choice, they usually decided against it. [7]. The government stated that they will resume the vaccination program under informed consent in April 2005.

On December 15, 2005, the FDA re-issued a Final Rule & Order[8] on the license status of the anthrax vaccine, clearing the way for mandatory vaccination reinstatement. After reviewing extensive scientific evidence and carefully considering comments from the public, the FDA again determined that the vaccine is licensed for the prevention of anthrax, regardless of the route of exposure.

On Oct. 16, 2006 the military announced intentions to resume vaccinations for select personnel again, but the vaccinations remained voluntary until further guidance by the DoD.[9] The DoD's official resumption status of the program awaited publication of service messages.[10]

On December 13, 2006, a new class-action lawsuit[11], filed on behalf of six unnamed plaintiffs, revived the legal battle over the military’s mandatory anthrax immunization program. According to court documents, the basic premise of the lawsuit is the plaintiffs’ claim that the vaccine is “unapproved for its applied/intended use.” The lawsuit says that “plaintiffs will suffer substantial and irreparable injury if they are forced to take the vaccine,” which the suit says has not been properly approved by the government, despite the Food and Drug Administration issuing its “final rule” on the vaccine on December 15, 2005. The suit also says the Defense Department has failed to follow presidential orders and federal laws that require the government to obtain informed consent before giving an unapproved and experimental vaccine to anyone.

References

  1. ^ "Anthrax Vaccine, GEO's Survey of Guard and Reserve Pilots and Aircrew" United States General Accounting Office Report to Congressional Requesters. Sept. 2002. GAO-02-445.
  2. ^ Pentagon shifts Anthrax vaccine to civilian uses" James Dao with Judith Miller, June 29, 2002.

    Mirrored site: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9C06E7DF1E3EF93AA15755C0A9649C8B63

  3. ^ "Judge: U.S. Can't Force Vaccines" CBS News, Dec. 22, 2003.
  4. ^ "Pentagon Says 200,000 Who Started Anthrax-Shot Regimen Must Continue" Sandra Jontz, Stars and Stripes European Edition, October 20, 2004
  5. ^ [1] DC District Court Permanent Injunction on Summary Judgment, Oct 27, 2004
  6. ^ "Anthrax Vaccinations Halted Again" United Press International, October 28, 2004.
  7. ^ "Troops divided on getting voluntary vaccine shots." Deborah Funk, July 25, 2005 AF Times
  8. ^ Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration.
    Docket No. 1980N-0208
    Biological Products; Bacterial Vaccines and Toxoids; Implementation of Efficacy Review; Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed; Final Order.
    AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    ACTION: Notice.
  9. ^ Pentagon to Resume Anthrax Inoculations." Lolita C. Baldor, Monday, October 16, 2006.
  10. ^ DoD's official anthrax vaccine immunization program website
  11. ^ "Defense Employees Set For Another Suit to Halt Mandatory Anthrax Shots." Josh White, Wednesday, December 13, 2006; Page A19.

See also

External Links


'"/>


(Date:11/20/2009)..., Nov. 20 Samuel Gladdi...ne what it means to be "happy" during the holidays...ialty in family counseling and chair of the Depart...ding says research shows that it is the pressure t...pression during the holidays. ,, That,s why he,...
(Date:11/20/2009)...e November 20 in the Journal of the National Canc...hopes that often appear in news coverage of cancer...h the media and journals to help alleviate the pro... Woloshin, M.D., M.S., of Center for Medicine and ...licy and Clinical Practice in New Hampshire, and B...
(Date:11/20/2009)...er 20, 2009Emergency medical service (EMS) provide...0 cardiac arrests each year. Only 5 to 10 percent... Better quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CP...sociated with better patient outcome. The Resusci...inical research network to study prehospital treat...
(Date:11/20/2009)... buying 90-day supply, study finds , , F...month supply of prescription drugs is up to one-th...ing to a new study. , U.S. researchers analyzed... 2000 and 2005, and found that patients who bought...y saved an average 29 percent in out-of-pocket cos...
(Date:11/20/2009)...time OB/GYN warns against the new breast cancer re...rvices Task Force. These guidelines may be cost-ef.... When is it wrong to be safe than sorry? , ...ces Task Force recommendations, published in the c...as set off a firestorm in the medical community. M...
Breaking Medicine News(10 mins):Health News:Why Holidays Don't Have To Be 'Happy' 2Health News:Promoting healthy skepticism in the news: Helping journalists get it right 2Health News:Effect of real-time CPR feedback reported at resuscitation science symposium 2Health News:Effect of real-time CPR feedback reported at resuscitation science symposium 3Health News:Three-Month Supply Lowers Drug Costs 2Health News:New Breast Cancer Recommendation May Cost Lives While Saving Money 2Health News:New Breast Cancer Recommendation May Cost Lives While Saving Money 3
...d that functional brain scans and tests of reading...ng which children will have ongoing reading proble...esearchers led by led by Fumiko Hoeft at Stanford ... struggling readers, ran for a school year. ...
...at sweet, which is high in calories, can lead to a... book by dermatologist Dr Fredric Brandt, has reve... According to Brandt, who discusses the effect of...on look ten years younger. "In a nutshell,...
...in the June issue of CHEST, reports that children ...re at greater risk for developing asthma by age 7...isk for asthma doubled in children receiving antib... year. Antibiotics are prescribed mostly ...
...ed a campaign Monday against South Korea's hard-dr...ear in social and economic losses, officials said ...sion and elsewhere to enhance public awareness of ...us. More worrisome is quick and excessive drinking...
...r threat from an outbreak of the highly pathogenic...ound a million pigs perished from the disease , a ...jing. In January, China identified the contag...The outbreak had begun last May. Says Jia You...
...hat they will able to uncover the fate of the lost...hed after more than 100 people settled on the Roa...ferent methods like genealogy, deeds and historica...new world. "The Lost Colony story is the b...
Other Medicine News:Health News:Combination of Brain Scans, Reading Skill Tests can Predict Kids Reading Problems 2Health News:Give Up Sugar to Keep Yourself Young 2Health News:Antibiotic Use in Infants may Lead to Asthma. 2Health News:Chinas Blue Ear Virus-no Hogwash 2Health News:DNA Link to a Lost Colony 2
Other medicine definitionOther TagsVegetarianLanguageLanguageAgeingSchizophrenicReasonReasonPlaceboPlacebo