Rapidly recover intact DNA from blood, bone marrow, and cultured cells
Brenda J. Rogers Mark J. Dycaico
Stratagene now offers updated protocols to isolate and purify high-molecular-weight genomic DNA using the RecoverEase DNA isolation kit. New procedures include DNA isolation from blood, bone marrow, and tissue culture cells. In addition, protocols for liver, lung, kidney, spleen, testes, and brain are also included. Each procedure eliminates the need for toxic phenol or chloroform and requires very little hands-on time to perform. Use the kit to minimize physical manipulation of the DNA the point in purification methodology where DNA is most susceptible to shearing forces. Fully hydrated high-molecular-weight DNA is ready to use in molecular biological applications in less than 24 hours.
The RecoverEase DNA isolation kit is designed to isolate very high-molecular-weight genomic DNA by reducing the shearing forces that take place in traditional methods using phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. The basic kit procedure requires tissue homogenization, filtration through a filter unit supplied with the kit to remove cellular debris (<3 minutes), isolation of the cell nuclei by centrifugation (<20 minutes), and protease digestion of the nuclei (45 minutes).1,2 The resulting suspension is transferred to a free-floating RecoverEase kit cup where the digested proteins and low molecular weight contaminants are removed by dialysis (16 to 48 hours), leaving behind fully hydrated DNA, which is ready for immediate use. From previous experiments using field inversion analysis, DNA isolated in this way, produced products that were 500-kb long.2 Subsequent Southern blot analysis demonstrated that the DNA cut with a variety of restriction enzymes (data not shown). These benefits, along w ith higher packaging efficiencies, make the RecoverEase DNA isolation kit the recommended method for purifying high-molecular-weight genomic DNA from blood, bone marrow, and cultured cells.
Genomic DNA isolated with this kit is ideal for recovering lambda shuttle vectors in transgenic in vivo mutation assay systems, such as Stratagenes Big Blue mutation assay systems.*,3,4,5 An important step in these mutation assays is retrieving large quantities of shuttle vector from the animals genomic DNA for subsequent analysis of mutations within a target region of the vector. The shuttle vector in Big Blue was derived from bacteriophage lambda and can be retrieved from the animal by subjecting the genomic DNA to the specialized in vitro lambda Transpack packaging extract.**,4 Because the shuttle vector is nearly 50-kb long and is present in multiple copies within the genome of the animal, efficient packaging is contingent on genomic DNA preparations of very high-molecular weight.6 The DNA must also have sufficient purity so as to be free of substances that inhibit the packaging reaction. For these reasons, measuring packaging efficiency in DNA preparations made from shuttle vector transgenics is a good indicator of DNA size and purity. DNA yielded from using the kit averaged a 74% greater recovery of plaque-forming units (pfu) per Transpack packaging reaction over organic extracted DNA overall for liver, kidney, spleen, testes, lung, and brain in Big Blue transgenic mice.6
The RecoverEase method (see Methods) was compared with the organic extraction technique in relation to DNA yield, quality, and packaging efficiency. The latter technique was taken from Stratagenes Big Blue DNA isolation kit, whic h uses a modified phenol-chloroform extraction and an ethanol precipitation protocol optimized for isolating high-molecular-weight genomic DNA from transgenic animals containing lambda shuttle vectors. The Big Blue DNA isolation kit was the first kit specifically designed to prepare genomic DNA of size and quality that, when subjected to in vitro packaging extracts, yielded large numbers of rescued shuttle vector.
Average Lambda Phage Recovery with RecoverEase DNA Isolation Kit and Organic Extraction Methods
Average total pfu recoverabled
Average pfu/mg DNAe
Big Blue rats
Big Blue mice
Big Blue rats
Big Blue mice
a Results are the averages of 2 to 5 samples each.
bAn aliquot of the recovered DNA was sheared through an 18-gauge needle, and the optical density at 260 nm was used to determine the DNA concentration for each sample. The concentration was multiplied by the volume recovered to give the DNA yield.
cDNA (8 l) was packaged per the Transpack protocol, and an aliquot of the total DNA was plated on the Big Blue SCS-8 E. coli strain to determine the number of pfu per reaction.
dThe estimated total pfu recoverable was determined using the number of pfu per reaction multiplied by the number of estimated reactions achievable from the total volume of DNA recovered.
eThe pfu/ug DNA was determined by dividing the total recoverable pfu by the total yield of DNA.
fNR: none recovered.
g The average of all samples for mice, rats, and tissues combined (for each extraction technique). For comparison purposes, average values are for bone marrow and fibroblast only.
Blood samples were collected from Big Blue rats, while individual bone marrow samples were taken from both Big Blue mice and Big Blue rats. The Big Blue mouse embryonic fibroblast and Big Blue rat 2 embryonic fibroblast cell lines were also tested. Genomic DNA was isolated from two to five individual samples of each tissue type, using both dialysis and organic extraction methods. The results of the comparison are shown in Table 1. When using 5 to 7 ml of rat blood, the standard organic extraction protocol (Big Blue DNA isolation kit) failed to yield DNA, even after two attemp ts. However, other organic extraction protocols begin with a blood volume of 20 ml7 so the lack of DNA recovery may have been due to an insufficient starting blood volume. The dialysis method yielded enough high-molecular-weight DNA from the same blood volume (5 to 7 ml) to package an average of over 3 million pfu of shuttle vector per sample. Among the remaining tissues tested, packaging efficiencies averaged 16% higher with the RecoverEase DNA samples, compared to those prepared using organic extraction. Although this increase is modest compared to previous comparisons in tissues such as liver,6 note that bone marrow and cultured cells are among the best substrates for the organic extraction method in terms of high rates of packaging success. DNA yields were similar using both techniques. DNA purity was also indistinguishable, with A260/280 ratios of 1.8 among all samples (data not shown).
The list of tissues amenable to Stratagenes RecoverEase DNA isolation kit now includes blood, bone marrow, and cultured cell lines. With the kit, reduce the need for hands-on time, eliminate toxic organic solutions, and remove ethanol precipitation and lengthy rehydration steps. Other potential applications for genomic DNA recovery include Southern blot analysis, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, PCR amplification, genomic library preparation, and shuttle vector recovery in transgenic in vivo mutation assays.
Blood: Recover rodent whole blood (5 to 7 ml) with the anticoagulant ACD (0.48% citric acid w/v, 1.32% sodium citrate w/v, 1.47% glucose w/v),7 and add five volumes of Tris-buffered ammonium chloride (140 mM NH4Cl, 17 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.65). After 5 minutes at 37C, pellet the lysed blo od cells by centrifugation, then wash the pellet with NaCl (0.85%) solution.7 The pellet may be stored at 80C. When ready for use, thaw the pellet, and isolate and purify the DNA following the standard kit protocol.
Bone Marrow: Inject lysis buffer through two mouse femurs or one rat femur, and incubate the lysate on ice for 10 minutes; centrifuge and digest/dialyze per the standard kit protocol.
Cultured Cells: Suspend cells (1 to 5 x 106) in lysis buffer, eliminate the coarse disruption step, and follow the standard procedure.
Monforte, J.A., et al. (1995) Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 23 (Suppl. 23): 46.
Rogers B.J., et al. (1996) Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 27 (Suppl. 27): 57.
Short, J.M., et al. (1988) Fed. Proc. 8515a.
Kohler, S.W., et al., (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 7958-7962.
Jakubczak, J.L., et al., (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 9073-9078.
Rogers, B.J., et al. (1996) Strategies 9 3: 73-74.
Sambrook, J., et al. (1987) Molecular Cloning: A laboratory Manual,Second edition. Cold Spring Harbor Press. New York. p. 9.17.
Rogers, B.J., (1998) Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 31 (Suppl. 29): 12.
* U.S. Patent Nos. 5,347,075 and 5,824,287 and 5,589,155;
European Patent No. 0289121;Japanese Patent No. 2618973
** U.S. Patent No. 5,188,957