Sensitivity: Its more than concentration
Be sure that sensitivity calculations are identical for a valid comparison. SPEX conservatively quotes a minimum signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of 2500:1 for the FluoroMax. In 2001, the average FluoroMax S/N was closer to 5000:1, and no instrument was shipped with a S/N below 3000:1. Compare this to other manufacturers who quote 500:1.
Let us compare experimental conditions. SPEX calculates S/N via a water-Raman test with 5-nm bandpass. Other companies use a 10nm bandpass on both emission and excitation monochromators. This lets twice the light into each monochromator and twice the light out, a factor of four for each monochromator, and 16 for the entire instrument. Thus, the other companies data are inflated by more than an order of magnitude. The S/N varies as the square root of the signal. Therefore, under similar conditions, the seemingly respectable number of 500:1 is actually closer to 100:1!
So, what does this mean for you?
Certainly the main indicator of sensitivity is the ability to examine lower concentrations. For expensive samples, you need less sample or you consume less probe. Yet there are two other advantages of sensitivity: accuracy and measurement time.
Measurement time: When comparing data with other firms, consider that the square root of the measured number of photons determines the S/N. If two instruments have a S/N difference of a factor of two, one will actually take four times longer than the other to measure the same signal.
Accuracy: The final measurement is only as good as the amount of data going in. To count photons with 1% accuracy, you need at least 10 000 photons. We assume random error and Gaussian statistics, so that the first standard deviation