Navigation Links
Bacterial Whole Genome Array Analysis

Isolate and Enrich for Bacterial mRNA

Isolating Bacterial RNA for Microarray Analysis
The rapid increase in the number of bacterial genomes sequenced over the past several years has opened up a new era in whole-genome expression analysis using DNA microarray technology. In recent years, this tool has been used to explore transcriptional profiles for a variety of bacteria leading to a greater understanding of microbial metabolism [1]. DNA microarray technology has also led to a better understanding of microbial pathogenesis, physiology, epidemiology, ecology, fermentation, and pathway engineering.

With the emerging importance of bacterial microarray gene expression analysis, it is vital that bacterial RNA isolated for array analysis be of the highest possible quality. Key characteristics unique to bacteria known to significantly impact RNA quality, and dramatically influence the quality and validity of array analysis, include:

1. Growth phase at harvest and harvest conditions

2. Rapid turnover of bacterial mRNA

3. Bacterial mRNAs' lack of a poly(A) tail, thus excluding the use of classical enrichment methods (e.g. oligo(dT) enrichment)

The last of these factors was the basis for developing Ambion's MICROBExpress Kit. MICROBExpress dramatically increa ses the sensitivity of array analysis by removing >95% of 16S and 23S rRNA from bacterial total RNA, leaving a highly enriched population of bacterial mRNA. The enriched mRNA serves as a superior template for synthesizing the labeled cDNA used in whole genome array analysis.

Pre-Isolation Factors That Affect RNA Quality
There are several key factors to consider before beginning any bacterial RNA isolation procedure. The first is when to harvest the bacteria to maximize yield and quality of intact RNA. The highest quality RNA is isolated from cells in the logarithmic phase of growth. RNA isolated from bacteria in the stationary phase typically exhibits increased degradation. For this reason, it is highly recommended that RNA not be harvested from cells that have grown into stationary phase unless a specific experiment requires such isolation.

A second factor to consider is the method used to harvest the bacteria. It is known that bacterial mRNAs exhibit a wide range of stabilities. For example, approximately 80% of all mRNAs in E. coli are known to have half-lives of between 3 and 8 minutes [2]. For this reason, it is important to collect cells in a manner that minimizes or eliminates the impact of harvesting conditions on both gene expression profiles and/or RNA quality. With this in mind, it is preferable to process small volumes of bacterial cultures (1-2 ml) and to use a brief centrifugation step (~1 min.) to pellet the cells. The cell pellets can then be processed with one of the following treatments:

Immediate cell lysis and RNA purification using RiboPure-Bacteria Kit

Rapid freezing in liquid nitrogen (a freeze-thaw treatment may aid lysis of some bacteria)

Resuspension of cells in RNAlater (see RNAlater Preserves Bacterial Gene Expression Profiles for Array Analysis).

These simple steps are of vital importance for obtaining the highest quality RNA required in array analysis.

Isolating Bacterial Total RNA: RiboPure-Bacteria
Traditional methods for isolation of total RNA from bacteria require the use of hot phenol or include other harsh techniques, some of which need specialized equipment. For Gram-positive organisms, pretreatments with enzymes to weaken the cell wall are often used prior to isolation of RNA. However, it should be kept in mind that these enzymatic pretreatments may alter gene expression patterns on a global scale and could compromise array data.

The RiboPure-Bacteria RNA Isolation Kit uses no enzymatic pretreatments and thus will not alter gene expression profiles. RiboPure-Bacteria combines an efficient glass bead and phenol-based RNAWIZ-mediated disruption step followed by a glass fiber filter-based RNA purification step for high yi elds of exceptionally pure RNA.

Removing Contaminating Genomic DNA: TURBO DNA-free
Once the RNA is purified, it should be treated with DNase to remove any contaminating genomic DNA. This is especially important for array analysis and/or qRT-PCR. Contaminating genomic DNA will be labeled during the cDNA synthesis/labeling reaction and/or lead to non-specific RT-PCR products that could interfere with quantitative results. TURBO DNA-free is ideal for this application (see The World's Best DNase).

Enriching for Bacterial mRNA: MICROBExpress
For decades mRNA has been isolated from eukaryotic sources using oligo(dT) selection. Bacterial mRNAs, however, lack the relatively stable poly(A) tails found on eukaryotic messages and thus cannot be enriched using affinity selection with oligo(dT). Ambion's MICROBExpress Kit offers enhanced signal sensitivity in gene expression analysis across all array platforms tested (including glass, nylon and GeneChip) by its ability to remove >95% of bacterial rRNA from total bacterial RNA preparations. The depletion of rRNA leaves behind a highly enriched bacterial mRNA population (See Figures 1 and Figure 2). Additionally, MICROBExpress leads to an increase in the total number of genes detected (i.e. increase in % present calls) and an improvement in overall signal to noise on GeneChip E. coli Antisense Genome Arrays (Figure 3).

Figure 1. Agilent Bioanalyzer Image of E. coli mRNA Purified Using MICROBExpress. 16S and 23S rRNAs were selectively removed from five different 10 g samples of E. coli total RNA and the remaining enriched mRNA fraction (~70 ng each) were run in Lanes 2-6. A sixth 10 g sample of the same total RNA prep was subjected to a mock MICROBExpress procedure without using the kit's rRNA capture oligo mix. Approximately 0.7 g micrograms of the mock reaction was loaded in Lane 7. As seen in the gel image the rRNA bands are virtually undetectable in the mRNA obtained with the MICROBExpress procedure versus the control lane.

Figure 2. Agilent Bioanalyzer Electropherograms of mRNA from Figure 1. As seen in the (top) electropherogram, greater than 95% of the bacterial 16S and 23S rRNA bands have been removed, leading to a selective enrichment of mRNA species as compared to the (bottom) mock MICROBExpress procedure. (Relative fluorescence units have been rescaled between the two electropherograms to allow a closer examination of the MICROBExpress enriched RNA).

Figure 3. Affymetrix GeneChip E. coli Antisense Genome Array Analysis. Illustrated above are Log Plots (Signal vs. Signal) for technical replicate GeneChips (i.e. same RNA, different probe labeling used for replicates). Panel A compares replicate arrays using 10 g RiboPure-Bacteria isolated E. coli total RNA with the standard Affymetrix labeling and hybridization protocol. Panel B compares replicate arrays utilizing the mRNA (0.69 g) obtained with the MICROBExpress Kit from 10 g of RiboPure-Bacteria isolated total RNA; this sample was labeled and hybridized using the same protocol as in Panel A. The total RNA (average between duplicate GeneChips) gave 73% Present Calls (genes above background) versus MICROBExpress isolated mRNA which gave 80% Present Calls, thus demonstrating an increase in sensitivity. In addition, the number of Concordant Calls for duplicate GeneChips increased with MICROBExpress mRNA (94%) compared with total RNA (92%). Concordant Calls are those genes called identically on both arrays (Present/Present, Marginal/Marginal or Absent/Absent), and is a direct measure of reproducibility.

*Correlation coefficients were >0.99 for both replicate comparisons.

GeneChip is a registered trademark of Affymetrix, Inc.

back to top

Ordering Information Cat# Product Name Size 1905 MICROBExpress Bacterial mRNA Enrichment Kit 20 rxns 1907 TURBO DNA-free 50 rxns 1925 RiboPure-Bacteria Kit 50 purifications 2238 TUR BO DNase (2 U/l) 1000 U 7020 RNAlater 100 ml


Page: All 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Related biology technology :

1. High-Throughput Cultivation of Bacterial Clones
2. Mammalian and Bacterial Expression in One Vector
3. Bacterial mRNA Isolation, Fast and Easy
4. Bacterial RNA Isolation From Infected Eukaryotic Hosts
5. Bacterial RNA Isolation From Infected Eukaryotic Hosts
6. Perform Microarray Analysis with Limited Bacterial RNA
7. RNAlater Preserves Bacterial Gene Expression Profiles for Array Analysis
8. Analysis of Bacterial Assemblage Genetic Diversity in Environmental Samples Using the DCode System
9. Monitoring Bacterial Genetic Diversity in a Freshwater Lake Using TTGE and DNA Sequence Analysis
10. Use of the DCode System to Detect the Food-Borne Bacterial Pathogen Listeria monocytogenes
11. Fast and Easy Isolation of PCR-Ready Genomic DNA from Whole Blood
Post Your Comments:

(Date:6/27/2016)... June 27, 2016  Global demand for enzymes ... through 2020 to $7.2 billion.  This market includes ... cleaning products, biofuel production, animal feed, and other ... and biocatalysts). Food and beverages will remain the ... increasing consumption of products containing enzymes in developing ...
(Date:6/27/2016)... ... June 27, 2016 , ... ... findings on what they believe could be a new and helpful biomarker for ... research. Click here to read it now. , Biomarkers are components ...
(Date:6/27/2016)... , ... June 27, 2016 , ... ... for Amgen, will join the faculty of the University of North Carolina ... professor of strategy and entrepreneurship at UNC Kenan-Flagler, with a focus on the ...
(Date:6/24/2016)... , June 24, 2016  Regular discussions on a ... take place between the two entities said Poloz. ... Ottawa , he pointed to the country,s ... the federal government. ... said, "Both institutions have common economic goals, why not sit ...
Breaking Biology Technology:
(Date:5/3/2016)... , May 3, 2016  Neurotechnology, a ... the MegaMatcher Automated Biometric Identification System (ABIS) ... large-scale multi-biometric projects. MegaMatcher ABIS can process multiple ... using any combination of fingerprint, face or iris ... MegaMatcher SDK and MegaMatcher Accelerator , ...
(Date:4/28/2016)... 2016 First quarter 2016:   ... with the first quarter of 2015 The gross margin ... (loss: 18.8) and the operating margin was 40% (-13) ... Cash flow from operations was SEK 249.9 M (21.2) , ... unchanged, SEK 7,000-8,500 M. The operating margin for 2016 ...
(Date:4/26/2016)... 27, 2016 Research and ... Biometrics Market 2016-2020"  report to their offering.  , ... The analysts forecast the global multimodal biometrics ... during the period 2016-2020.  Multimodal biometrics ... such as the healthcare, BFSI, transportation, automotive, and ...
Breaking Biology News(10 mins):