| HOME >> BIOLOGY >> TECHNOLOGY |
SAN FRANCISCO, Jan. 30 /PRNewswire/ -- ChemRisk, a leading scientific consulting firm, was asked by the Corn Refiners Association (CRA) to examine the recent publication by Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP), "Not So Sweet: Missing Mercury and High Fructose Corn Syrup," and the Environmental Health journal publication "Mercury from chlor-alkali plants: measured concentrations in food product sugar," by Dufault et al, 2009, and to offer our comments and analysis.
In summary we found:
-- The IATP report and Environmental Health article it references fall
well below standards for proper scientific research and published
literature.
-- The authors of both publications provide incomplete data and misleading
conclusions.
-- Methods described by the authors deviate from standard procedure in
testing for mercury.
-- The authors ignore important distinctions between organic and other
forms of mercury and their implications for assessing human health
risk.
-- Even if it were assumed that the mercury content found in the extremely
limited sampling of foods and beverages was representative, the amounts
are far lower than levels of concern set by government agencies.
-- The authors assume that the total mercury they detected in a
questionably small sampling of consumer foods is primarily the result
of high fructose corn syrup; an assumption that has not been properly
tested or validated. The recipes for the items studied may have had
multiple sources of potential contamination
To imply that there is a safety concern to consumers based on the findings presented is both incorrect and irresponsible.
By combining the results of a four-year-old sampling analysis of high
fructose corn syrup with a more recent testing of branded foods and beverages
for total mercury, the IATP
'/>"/>
| SOURCE ChemRisk Copyright©2009 PR Newswire. All rights reserved |