Navigation Links
DNA Microarray Market Trends (Installed Base, Applications, Purchase Plans and the Impact of Next-Gen Sequencing)
Date:11/7/2011

NEW YORK, Nov. 7, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportlinker.com announces that a new market research report is available in its catalogue:

DNA Microarray Market Trends (Installed Base, Applications, Purchase Plans and The Impact of Next-Gen Sequencing)

http://www.reportlinker.com/p0681348/DNA-Microarray-Market-Trends-Installed-Base-Applications-Purchase-Plans-and-The-Impact-of-Next-Gen-Sequencing.html#utm_source=prnewswire&utm_medium=pr&utm_campaign=In_Vitro_Diagnostic

DNA Microarrays are utilized heavily by research labs for a number of tasks such as gene profiling, RNA detection and SNP analysis. But as Kalorama Information's DNA Market Trends report indicates, the market for these systems is about to experience change. The report authored by Kalorama Information biotech analyst Justin Saeks, is the result of surveys carried out with microarray labs to determine the current state of the microarray market and attempt to predict the future direction of the technologies.

As part of the survey, analyst Justin Saeks contacted 114 labs worldwide (76% U.S.) to determine the current usage of the DNA microarrays, system installs and future purchases, as well as where they will intersect with next-generation sequencing. The following represents the types of data the survey addressed and this report provides:

  • Number and brand of Microarry systems owned

  • Fluidics stations and/ or Hybridization Ovens Used

  • Applications Run Most Often

  • Chips Run Most, Samples Run Per Month

  • Catalog Arrays versus Commercial or In-house Custom Arrays

  • Outsourcing of Microarray Samples

  • What Microarray Features, or Steps in the Sequencing Process Labs Would Like to Change

  • Main Bottlenecks in Microarray Process

  • Lab-Identified Challenges of Data Analysis and Data Management

  • Applications with an Increase in Samples from 2011 - 2013?

  • How Labs expect Next-generation Sequencing to Affect the Usage of Microarrays

  • Sample Preparation Products Used

  • Future Purchase Plans and Time-Frames

Respondents were asked what type of brands they use or plan to use, types of applications run most commonly with each brand, and their future purchase plans. Products of the following companies are among the survey results in this report:

  • Affymetrix

  • Molecular Devices/ Axon

  • Agilent

  • Illumina

  • NimbleGen

  • PerkinElmer

  • ND

  • Agilent

  • NimbleGen/ MAUI

  • Advalytics

  • Digilab

  • SciGene HyBex

  • BioConductor

  • Partek

  • GeneSpring

  • GeneSifter

  • In-house

  • Array-Pro Analyzer

  • ArrayStar

  • Biominer

  • Chipster

  • GeneDirector

  • GenePix Pro

  • Rosetta Resolver

  • Dchip

  • GMP Genomics

  • Ingenuity

  • Pacific Biosciences

  • Ion Torrent

  • ABI

  • Roche/454

CHAPTER ONE: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Introduction

Scope

Lab Demographics

Summary of Findings

CHAPTER TWO: INTRODUCTION & DEMOGRAPHICS

Methodology

Outline

Demographics

Regional Distribution of Respondents' Labs

Industrial Distribution of Respondents Labs

Laboratory Function of Respondents' Labs

Overall

Regional Distribution

Positions/ Titles of Respondents

Distribution of Systems Installed

Numbers of Scanners/ Readers in Labs

Numbers of Fluidics Stations

Numbers of Hybridization Ovens

Number of Other Scanners/ Readers in Organization

Number of Other Scanners/ Readers in Organization

Brand(s) of Scanners/ Readers Owned

CHAPTER THREE: SYSTEM INSTALLATIONS

Distribution of Scanner Models

Total and Average Number of Readers by Brand

Affymetrix Scanners/ Readers Installed

Illumina Scanners/ Readers Installed

Agilent Scanners/ Readers Installed

Molecular Devices (Axon) Readers/ Scanners Installed

Other Scanners/ Readers Installed

Brands of Scanners in Labs, Cross-Referenced

Brands of Hybridization Ovens

3rd Party Software Used for Data Analysis

Installed Base by Region

Overall Brand/ Type

Installed Base of Readers by Industry Segment

Installed Base of Readers by Laboratory Function

Applications and Usage Trends

Applications, Chips, Number of Samples

Applications Run Overall and by Brand/ Type

Applications Most Likely to Increase

Number of Microarray Samples Run per Month, by Brand

Brand of Microarrays Used Most by Scanner/ Reader

Top Catalog Microarray Products Used, by Brand

Usage of Catalog vs Custom Chips

Main Source for Custom Microarrays/ Probes

Outsourcing

Systems Used to Check Concentration, Size, Quality

CHAPTER FOUR: PREFERENCES AND EVALUATIONS

Ratings and Evaluations of Systems

Ratings by Brand

End-user Verbatim Comments About Microarray System Brands

General (multiple brands)

Affymetrix

Agilent

Illumina

In-house/ spotted

NimbleGen

Changes or Improvements, by Brand

Bottlenecks in Process, by Brand

Criteria for Choosing Sample Preparation Products

Brands Used Most for Sample Preparation

RNA/DNA Extraction

Brands Used for Amplification and Labeling

Difficulty of Data Analysis & Data Management

Data Analysis

Data Management

End-User Verbatim Comments

Data Analysis

CHAPTER FIVE: FUTURE PURCHASE PLANS

Time-Frame of Microarray System Purchase Plans

System Purchases Planned Within Two Years

Systems Labs Would Choose Today for Same Applications

Expected Effects of Next-Gen Sequencing on Microarrays

Impact of Sequencing on Labs' Microarray Usage

End-User Verbatim Comments

Near-term Effects, Large Effects

Longer term Effects

Minor effects

TABLE OF EXHIBITS

CHAPTER ONE: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Table 1-1: Summary of Findings

CHAPTER TWO: INTRODUCTION & DEMOGRAPHICS

Table 2-1: Regional Distribution of Respondent Labs

Figure 2-1: Regional Distribution of Respondent Labs

Table 2-2: Industrial Distribution of Respondent Labs

Figure 2-2: Industrial Distribution of Respondent Labs

Table 2-3: Industrial Distribution by Region

Table 2-4: Industrial Distribution by Region

Figure 2-3: Industrial Distribution by Region

Table 2-5: Distribution of Labs' Main Function(s)

Figure 2-4: Distribution of Labs' Main Function(s)

Table 2-6: Distribution of Lab Function(s) by Region

Table 2-7: Distribution of Lab Function(s) by Region

Figure 2-5: Distribution of Lab Function(s) by Region

Table 2-9: Distribution of Respondents' Position/ Title

Figure 2-6: Distribution of Respondents' Position/ Title

Table 2-10: Distribution of Total Number of Scanners/ Readers

Figure 2-7: Distribution of Total Number of Scanners/ Readers

Table 2-11: Distribution of Number of Affymetrix Fluidics Stations

Figure 2-8: Distribution of Number of Affymetrix Fluidics Stations

Table 2-12: Distribution of Number of Hybridization Ovens

Table 2-13: Number of Other Scanners/ Readers in Organization

Table 2-14: Other Systems Used in Lab for These Applications

Figure 2-9: Other Systems Used in Lab for These Applications

Table 2-15: Brand(s) of Scanner/ Reader Owned

Figure 2-10: Brand(s) of Scanner/ Reader Owned

CHAPTER THREE: SYSTEM INSTALLATIONS

Table 3-1: Number of Systems Installed, by Brand

Figure 3-1: Average Number of Systems Installed, by Brand

Table 3-2: Scanner Models Installed in Affymetrix Owning Labs

Figure 3-2: Scanner Models in Affymetrix Owning Labs (% of Sys)

Table 3-4: System Models Installed in Illumina Owning Labs

Figure 3-4: System Models Installed in Illumina Owning Labs (% of Sys)

Table 3-5: Scanner Models Installed in Agilent Owning Labs

Figure 3-5: Scanner Models Installed in Agilent Owning Labs (% of Sys)

Table 3-6: Scanner Models Installed in Molec. Devices Owning Labs

Figure 3-6: Scanners Installed in Molec. Devices Owning Labs (% of Sys)

Table 3-7: Other Scanners Installed in Respondent Labs

Figure 3-7: Other Scanners Installed in Respondent Labs (% of Systems)

Table 3-8: Brands of Readers in Labs Owning Given Brand (# of Systems)

Figure 3-8: Brands of Readers in Labs Owning Given Brand (% of Systems)

Table 3-9: Brands of Hybridization Ovens Installed

Figure 3-9: Brands of Hybridization Ovens Installed (% of Systems)

Table 3-10: Third-Party Software Used for Data Analysis

Table 3-11: Number of Scanners/ Readers by Region

Table 3-12: Brands of Scanners/ Readers by Region

Table 3-13: Brands of Scanners/ Readers by Region

Figure 3-10: Brands of Scanners/ Readers by Region (% of Systems)

Table 3-14: Regional Distribution Cross-Referenced by Brand

Table 3-15: Number of Scanners/ Readers by Industry/ Segment

Table 3-16: Brands of Scanners/ Readers by Industry/ Segment

Table 3-17: Brands of Scanners/ Readers by Industry/ Segment

Table 3-18: Industrial Distribution Cross-Referenced by Brand

Table 3-19: Number of Scanners/ Readers by Lab Function

Table 3-20: Brands of Scanners/ Readers by Lab Function

Table 3-21: Brands of Scanners/ Readers by Lab Function

Table 3-22: Lab Function Distribution, Cross-Referenced by Brand

Table 3-23: Applications Run on System, by Brand of Reader

Figure 3-11: Applications Run on System, by Brand of Reader

Table 3-24: Applications Most Likely to Increase

Figure 3-12: Applications Most Likely to Increase

Table 3-25: Number of Samples/ Month, by Brand (# of Scanners)

Table 3-26: Number of Samples/ Month, by Brand (% of Scanners)

Table 3-27: # Samples/ Month by Brand, Cross-Referenced by # Samples

Table 3-26: Microarray Brand(s) Used Most by Reader (# of Readers)

Table 3-27: Microarray Brand(s) Used Most by Reader (% of Readers)

Table 3-28: Brands Used by Reader, Cross-Referenced by Chip Brand

Table 3-29: Top Three Microarrays Used, by Brand

Table 3-30: Percentage Usage of Catalog vs Custom Chips

Figure 3-13: Percentage Usage of Catalog vs Custom Chips

Table 3-31: Source(s) of Custom Microarrays/ Probes (% of Labs)

Figure 3-14: Source(s) of Custom Microarrays/ Probes (% of Labs)

Table 3-32: Outsourcing of Microarray Samples

Figure 3-15: Outsourcing of Microarray Samples

Table 3-33: Reasons for Outsourcing Microarray Samples

Figure 3-16: Reasons for Outsourcing Microarray Samples

Table 3-34: Systems Used to Check Concentration, Size, Quality

Figure 3-17: Systems Used to Check Concentration, Size, Quality

CHAPTER FOUR: PREFERENCES AND EVALUATIONS

Table 4-1: Microarray Systems Ratings, by Major Brands (Cost, Throughput, Software, Dynamic Range, Ease of Use, Content on Arrays, Sample Size, Customer Service)

Figure 4-1: Microarray Systems Ratings, by Brand (Cost, Throughput, Software, Dynamic Range, Ease of Use, Content on Arrays, Sample Size, Customer Service)

Table 4-2: Features/ Steps to Improve or Change, by Brand

Table 4-3: Features/ Steps to Improve or Change, by Brand

Table 4-4: Bottleneck Where Samples Back Up, by Brand(Sample Prep, Fluidics, Labeling, Scanning, Data Analysis, Personnel, Hybridization, Other )

Table 4-5: Bottleneck Where Samples Back Up, by Brand (Sample Prep, Fluidics, Labeling, Scanning, Data Analysis, Personnel, Hybridization, Other )

Table 4-6: Criteria for Choosing Sample Preparation Products (Precedence, Cost, Ease of Use, Reproducibility, Throughput, Automation, Small Sample, Customer Service, Other)

Figure 4-2: Criteria for Choosing Sample Preparation Products (Precedence, Cost, Ease of Use, Reproducibility, Throughput, Automation, Small Sample, Customer Service, Other)

Table 4-7: Brands Used Most for RNA/ DNA Extraction

Figure 4-3: Brands Used Most for RNA/ DNA Extraction

Table 4-8: Brands Used Most for Amplification and Labeling

Figure 4-4: Brands Used Most for Amplification and Labeling

Table 4-9: Difficulty of Data Analysis

Figure 4-5: Difficulty of Data Analysis

Table 4-10: Difficult of Data Management

Figure 4-6: Difficulty of Data Management

CHAPTER FIVE: FUTURE PURCHASE PLANS

Table 5-1: Planned Purchases of Systems Within Two Years

Figure 5-1: Planned Purchases of Systems Within Two Years

Table 5-2: Time-Frame of Purchase Plans Within Two Years

Figure 5-2: Time-Frame of Purchase Plans Within Two Years

Table 5-3: Brands of Planned System Purchases

Figure 5-3: Brands of Planned System Purchases

Table 5-4: System(s) Labs Would Choose Today for Same Applications

Figure 5-4: System(s) Labs Would Choose Today for Same Applications

Table 5-5: Impact of Next-Gen Sequencing

To order this report:

In Vitro Diagnostic Industry: DNA Microarray Market Trends (Installed Base, Applications, Purchase Plans and The Impact of Next-Gen Sequencing)

In Vitro Diagnostic Business News

More  Industry Analysis and Insights

CONTACT:
Nicolas Bombourg
Reportlinker
Email: nbo@reportlinker.com
US: (805)652-2626
Intl: +1 805-652-2626


'/>"/>
SOURCE Reportlinker
Copyright©2010 PR Newswire.
All rights reserved

Related biology technology :

1. CapitalBio Corporation and VigeneTech Inc. Have Announced the Launch of a Fully Integrated Microarray Solution Platform
2. Ambry Genetics Announces Certified Service Provider Status for Agilent Microarrays
3. Kinexus Announces the Launch of a New Protein Kinase Microarray
4. Reportlinker Adds Biochips and Microarrays - Technologies, markets and companies
5. Biochips: Genosensors, Microarrays, Labs-On-The-Chip
6. MarketsandMarkets: Global Biochip (DNA Microarrays, Lab-on-Chip, Protein Microarrays, Tissue & Cell Arrays) Market to Reach $5.6 Billion by 2015
7. Biochips Market (DNA Microarrays, Lab-on-Chip, Protein Microarrays, Tissue & Cell Arrays) Trends & Global Forecast (2010-2015)
8. Roche Researchers Sequence Complete Genome of Cynomolgus Monkey and Develop Novel Gene Expression Microarray for Drug Safety Assessment
9. Global Biochip Markets: Microarrays and Lab-on-a-Chip
10. Concentric Medical(R) Announces Co-Marketing Agreement With InTouch Health(R) to Advance Acute Ischemic Stroke Care
11. XTL Biopharmaceuticals Receives Notice of Non-Compliance with Nasdaq Marketplace Rule Due to Changes in Board Composition
Post Your Comments:
*Name:
*Comment:
*Email:
(Date:2/11/2016)... YORK , Feb. 11, 2016  Bioethics International, a ... medicines are researched, developed, marketed and made accessible to patients ... BMJ Open had named the publication of the ... 2015. The publication is also featured as one of ... in the last year that are most frequently read. ...
(Date:2/11/2016)... ... February 11, 2016 , ... ... dedicated to delivering cutting-edge information focused on the development and manufacture of ... become a premier sponsor of the 2016 BioProcess International Awards – Recognizing ...
(Date:2/11/2016)...   BioInformant announces the February 2016 release ... Opportunities, Tools, and Technologies – Market Size, Segments, Trends, ... The first and only market ... BioInformant has more than a decade of historical information ... stem cell type. This powerful 175 page global strategic ...
(Date:2/11/2016)... ... 2016 , ... Global Stem Cells Group, has ... The new facility will provide advanced protocols and state-of-the-art techniques in cellular medicine, ... , The new GSCG clinic is headed by four prominent Ecuadorian physicians, including ...
Breaking Biology Technology:
(Date:2/1/2016)... Canada , February 1, 2016 ... technological advancements to drive global touchfree intuitive gesture control ... --> Rising sales of consumer electronics coupled ... gesture control market size through ... consumer electronics coupled with new technological advancements to drive ...
(Date:1/25/2016)... 2016   Unisys Corporation (NYSE: UIS ) today ... (JFK) International Airport, New York City , to ... attempting to enter the United States using ... pilot testing of the system at Dulles last year. ... JFK during January 2016. --> pilot testing of ...
(Date:1/20/2016)... 20, 2016 A market that just keeps ... from the explosion in genomics knowledge. Learn all about ... A range of dynamic trends are pushing market growth ... medicine - pharmacogenomics - pathogen evolution - next generation ... - greater understanding of the role of genetic material ...
Breaking Biology News(10 mins):