Harris' paper describes Stone Age societies in which the mother of a newborn had to decide whether she had the resources to nurture her baby. The newborn's appearance probably influenced whether the mother kept or abandoned it. An attractive baby was more likely to be kept and reared.
Harris' theory is that this kind of parental selection may have been an important force in evolution. If Stone Age people believed that hairless babies were more attractive than hairy ones, this could explain why humans are the only apes lacking a coat of fur. Harris suggests that Neanderthals must have been furry in order to survive the Ice Age. Our species would have seen them as "animals" and potential prey. Harris?hypothesis continues that Neanderthals went extinct because human ancestors ate them.
This year's prize judge was Professor Jonathan Rees FMedSci of Edinburgh University, Scotland ?co-discoverer of the 'red hair gene'. Professor Rees said: "This paper is an excellent example of the kind of bold thinking and theorizing which David Horrobin intended to encourage when he began Medical Hypotheses. I hope that Judith Rich Harris' idea provokes debate and further investigation of this topic."
Related biology news :
1. Survey reveals women and doctors arent talking about HPV
2. Yale researchers identify molecule for detecting parasitic infection in humans
3. Friendly bacteria in humans may protect against HIV
4. The lopsided brain: Attention bias is shared by humans and birds
5. Oldest cranial, dental and postcranial fossils of early modern European humans confirmed
6. Retrovirus struck ancestors of chimpanzees and gorillas millions of years ago, but did not affect ancestral humans
7. UI researcher studies deafness in fruit flies, humans
8. Chickadees can help humans get their bearings
9. Study shows humans have ability to track odors, much like bloodhounds
10. Caloric restriction wont dramatically extend life span in humans: UCLA research
11. Study identifies gene in mice that may control risk-taking behavior in humans