The findings will be presented by Dr. Simon Hampton at the BA Festival of Science on Setpember 5.
Dr. Hampton and his team at UEA's School of Social Work and Psychosocial Studies examined what different groups of people in the UK would "design into" their children given the opportunity.
The evidence suggests that there are gender, age and socio-economic class differences in what is deemed desirable and that many prospective parents would be prepared to manipulate their babies in ways that are at odds with moral orthodoxy.
"People assume that the very notion of designer babies stems from the desire of prospective parents for their children to be healthy," said Dr. Hampton.
"However, the picture is complicated by the shifting meaning of 'healthy' and confusion about when the manipulation of children's physical, psychological or social characteristics is legitimate, natural or ethical."
We are often presented with information and speculation about what reproductive technologies might achieve in the future and with various ethical dilemmas. This new research is among the first to investigate the thoughts and feelings of ordinary prospective parents.
The results of a series of surveys of 100-200 participants included:
Reproductive technologies and designer babies will be held in ARTS 01.02 at UEA on Tuesday September 5 from 4-6pm.
Source:University of East Anglia
Related biology news :
1. Oh, rats! Designer animals reveal possible heart disease genes
2. Asymptomatic HIV babies could use earlier treatment
3. OHSU research shows vitamin C counteracts some negative impacts of smoking on unborn babies
4. New brain scan technology could save babies lives
5. New tool tracks brain development in babies
6. Todays babies are fatter babies
7. Research offers new hope for preterm babies
8. Hair samples show babies can be exposed to crystal meth while in the womb
9. Solvent exposure linked to birth defects in babies of male painters
10. Why do cold animals make bigger babies?
11. A revolution in the monitoring of unborn babies