Navigation Links
The biology of politics: Liberals roll with the good, conservatives confront the bad
Date:1/5/2012

From cable TV news pundits to red-meat speeches in Iowa and New Hampshire, our nation's deep political stereotypes are on full display: Conservatives paint self-indulgent liberals as insufferably absent on urgent national issues, while liberals say fear-mongering conservatives are fixated on exaggerated dangers to the country.

A new study from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln suggests there are biological truths to such broad brushstrokes.

In a series of experiments, researchers closely monitored physiological reactions and eye movements of study participants when shown combinations of both pleasant and unpleasant images. Conservatives reacted more strongly to, fixated more quickly on, and looked longer at the unpleasant images; liberals had stronger reactions to and looked longer at the pleasant images compared with conservatives.

"It's been said that conservatives and liberals don't see things in the same way," said Mike Dodd, UNL assistant professor of psychology and the study's lead author. "These findings make that clear quite literally."

To gauge participants' physiological responses, they were shown a series of images on a screen. Electrodes measured subtle skin conductance changes, which indicated an emotional response. The cognitive data, meanwhile, was gathered by outfitting participants with eyetracking equipment that captured even the most subtle of eye movements while combinations of unpleasant and pleasant photos appeared on the screen.

While liberals' gazes tended to fall upon the pleasant images, such as a beach ball or a bunny rabbit, conservatives clearly focused on the negative images of an open wound, a crashed car or a dirty toilet, for example.

Consistent with the idea that conservatives seem to respond more to negative stimuli while liberals respond more to positive stimuli, conservatives also exhibited a stronger physiological response to images of Democratic politicians presumed to be a negative to them than they did on pictures of well-known Republicans. Liberals, on the other hand, had a stronger physiological response to the Democrats presumed to be a positive stimulus to them than they did to images of the Republicans.

By studying both physiological and cognitive aspects, the researchers established unique new insights into the growing notion that political leanings are at least partial products of our biology, UNL political scientist and study co-author Kevin Smith said.

Recent research on the subject has focused mostly on physiological reactions to negative stimuli. The new study's use of cognitive data regarding both positive and negative imagery adds to the understanding of how liberals and conservatives see and experience the world, Smith said.

UNL political scientist and co-author John Hibbing said the results might mean that those on the right are more attuned and attentive to aversive elements in life and are more naturally inclined to confront them. From an evolutionary standpoint, that makes sense, he said.

The results also are consistent with conservatives' support of policies to protect society from perceived external threats (support for increased defense spending or opposition to immigration) and internal ones as well (support for traditional values and being tough on crime), Hibbing said.

The researchers were careful to not make a value judgment on either political orientation. But they did note that their discovery provided an opportunity to recognize the relevance of deeper biological variables in politics and turn down political polarization.

Rather than believing those with opposite political views are uninformed or willfully obtuse, the authors said, political tolerance could be enhanced if it was widely understood that political differences are based in part on our physiological and cognitive differences.

"When conservatives say that liberals are out of it and just don't get it, from this standpoint, that's true," Hibbing said. "And when liberals say 'What are (conservatives) so frightened of? Is the world really that dangerous?' Given what each side sees, what they pay attention to, what they physiologically experience the answer is both sides are right."


'/>"/>
Contact: Mike Dodd, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
mdodd2@unl.edu
402-472-0547
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Source:Eurekalert

Related biology news :

1. Illuminating biology: An evolutionary perspective
2. A new journal where molecular biology meets clinical research
3. New Systems Biology Awards enable detailed study of microbes
4. Penn State receives new NASA astrobiology grant
5. Synthetic Biology: Coming Up Fast!
6. Researchers apply systems biology and glycomics to study human inflammatory diseases
7. Systems biology brings hope of speeding up drug development
8. December 2008 highlights from Biology of Reproduction
9. Toward a systems biology map of iron metabolism
10. French scientist wins the Journal of Experimental Biology Outstanding Paper Prize
11. Synthetic biology: Is ethics a showstopper?
Post Your Comments:
*Name:
*Comment:
*Email:
(Date:4/5/2017)... 5, 2017 Today HYPR Corp. , ... server component of the HYPR platform is officially ... end-to-end security architecture that empowers biometric authentication across Fortune ... already secured over 15 million users across the financial ... connected home product suites and physical access represent a ...
(Date:4/3/2017)... WASHINGTON , April 3, 2017 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ ... single-cell precision engineering platform, detected a statistically ... cell product prior to treatment and objective ... highlight the potential to predict whether cancer ... prior to treatment, as well as to ...
(Date:3/30/2017)... , March 30, 2017 Trends, opportunities and ... and behavioral), by technology (fingerprint, AFIS, iris recognition, facial ... and others), by end use industry (government and law ... financial and banking, and others), and by region ( ... , Asia Pacific , and the ...
Breaking Biology News(10 mins):
(Date:4/26/2017)... ... April 26, 2017 , ... Led by ex-FDA official Peggy ... comes to Tampa, San Francisco and Boston in 2017. The 2016 sold-out ... such as Pfizer Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals, Advaxis, Inc., Ocular Therapeutix Inc., Cell Culture ...
(Date:4/26/2017)... ... 26, 2017 , ... NextSteps 2017, NetDimensions’ annual global user ... this May on the following dates: , ?    London, UK from May 10-11, ?    New ... and Performance Institute will be the opening keynote speaker at the NextSteps ...
(Date:4/25/2017)... ... April 25, 2017 , ... As part of the Stago EdVantage ... laboratory testing for DIC in order to illuminate this clinical problem for people unfamiliar ... hospitalized patients resulting in a high degree of morbidity and mortality. DIC is a ...
(Date:4/25/2017)... Providence -based biotechnology ... technology to an undisclosed global pharmaceutical company, for ... Tregitopes, pronounced T·rej·itopes, are a set of peptides ... Annie De Groot and EpiVax CIO ... autoimmune disease therapy, Tregitopes are capable of engaging regulatory ...
Breaking Biology Technology: