Navigation Links
The EU must allocate fewer emission allowances and stop making free allocations
Date:9/28/2009

EU emissions trading has put a price on something that used to be free the right to pollute the atmosphere.

Allocating free allowances creates problematic expectations among companies; "If we emit a lot today, we'll be given a large number of emission allowances tomorrow." This runs completely counter to the idea of encouraging emission reductions, says the researcher Markus Wrke, at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

Markus Wrke is a researcher at IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Ltd, and in his doctoral thesis he examines European energy and climate policy, in particular emissions trading. He believes that the academic discussion on emissions trading made a relatively deep impression on the European Commission and the Swedish Government when the revisions of the EU ETS that will apply from 2013 were drawn up.

"It was disappointing that the negotiations between the Member States and the European Parliament then resulted in a somewhat watered-down decision. I nevertheless feel that my research is contributing to making the system better. It is worse that while I and other researchers identified shortcomings in the trading system early on, back in 2004, no serious changes will be made until 2013.

Wrke feels that the EU emissions trading system offers great potential and could play a key role in reducing European greenhouse gas emissions. With a correctly designed trading scheme, the EU can attain the targets that are set, at the lowest possible cost to society.

But in important respects the present-day system and rules provide incentives that are completely the opposite of what was intended. As emission allowances have been allocated free and on the basis of historical emissions, expectations have been raised that high emissions today can be rewarded tomorrow. As a result, investments in climate-efficient technology which would have happened if the emission allowances had instead been auctioned have probably been counteracted and delayed. Another example is that in several countries, including Germany and Denmark, an investment in coal-based electricity production has provided entitlement to more emission allowances than an investment in biofuel-based electricity production.

"The most important changes to the system would be firstly to reduce the number of emission allowances in the market. The total volume of emissions is determined by how many emission allowances are allocated or sold by the EU to companies. The volume of emissions becomes exactly the same as the number of emission allowances. Secondly there is a need for a sharp increase in the proportion of emission allowances sold to companies, rather than allocated to firms at no cost as is done at present.

The changes proposed to come into effect in 2013 signify important steps in the right direction, according to Wrke. The number of emission allowances decreases somewhat in comparison with today, by 1.74 per cent annually starting in 2013, compared with the average number over the period 2008-2012. Another change is that roughly half the emission allowances will be sold at auctions instead of being allocated for free. Only 4 per cent of emission allowances are sold at present. But important questions remain:

"Who is to receive the 50 per cent of emission allowances that are to be allocated free? On what grounds is the number each company is to receive to be decided? The EU has established assessment criteria, but they are so woolly that they have led to intensive lobbying by industry. It has not been decided how the auctions will be held in practice," Wrke notes.

Facts: Emissions trading

The principle underpinning EU emissions trading is that the EU decides the maximum total carbon dioxide emissions that can be permitted from industry each year. On the other hand, the EU does not involve itself in who makes these emissions. Instead companies are allowed to buy and sell carbon dioxide emission allowances among themselves. The company must have an "emission allowance" for each ton of carbon dioxide that is emitted..

The price of an emission allowance is presently around 14per tonne of carbon dioxide. This is less than one-fifth of the Swedish tax on carbon dioxide. The EU decides the total number of emission allowances available to the market. At present there are just over 2 billion. Emission allowances in the market created by the EU.

The idea behind emissions trading is to meet a particular environmental target at least cost to society. When companies are allowed to trade emission allowances, those companies that face high costs in reducing their emissions will instead buy emission allowances from companies whose costs in taking measures are lower.

If, instead of emissions trading, all companies were forced to reduce their emissions by the same amount, it would be very expensive for some companies while it would hardly cost anything at all for others. The total cost to society would be higher than if there was emissions trading.


'/>"/>

Contact: Karin Backteman
karin.backteman@economics.gu.se
46-317-862-595
University of Gothenburg
Source:Eurekalert

Related biology news :

1. 2009 DOE INCITE projects allocated at ORNL
2. Warmer springs mean less snow, fewer flowers in the Rockies
3. Fewer babies born after Caesarean delivery
4. Fewer deaths with preventive antibiotic use
5. New MRI technique could mean fewer breast biopsies in high-risk women
6. Groundbreaking Canada-US study proves link between emissions and mercury pollution in fish
7. CO2 emissions could violate EPA ocean-quality standards within decades
8. Groundbreaking Canada-US study proves link between emissions and mercury pollution in fish
9. RIT to study air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions in the Great Lakes region
10. Decline in uptake of carbon emissions confirmed
11. US faces burning emissions issue
Post Your Comments:
*Name:
*Comment:
*Email:
(Date:4/24/2017)... Janice Kephart , former 9/11 ... Partners, LLP (IdSP) , today issues the following ... March 6, 2017 Executive Order: Protecting the ... be instilled with greater confidence, enabling the reactivation ... applications are suspended by until at least July ...
(Date:4/17/2017)... , April 17, 2017 NXT-ID, Inc. ... company, announces the filing of its 2016 Annual Report on Form ... Exchange Commission. ... Form 10-K is available in the Investor Relations section of the ... on the SEC,s website at http://www.sec.gov . 2016 ...
(Date:4/11/2017)... April 11, 2017 Crossmatch®, a globally-recognized ... solutions, today announced that it has been awarded ... Projects Activity (IARPA) to develop next-generation Presentation Attack ... "Innovation has been a driving force within ... will allow us to innovate and develop new ...
Breaking Biology News(10 mins):
(Date:5/24/2017)... May 23, 2017 As Ebola resurfaces in the ... deaths and 20 suspected cases now reported, a new analysis ... database, showed a correlation between the 2014 and 2017 outbreaks ... rose sharply in 2012-13, which preceded the 2014 outbreak. An ... Ebola gene Replikin counts in 2014-15, which again precedes the ...
(Date:5/23/2017)... Yorba Linda, Ca (PRWEB) , ... ... ... stem cells (PSCs) offer an unlimited source of human cardiovascular cells for ... efficient cardiac-directed differentiation methods makes it possible to generate large numbers of ...
(Date:5/23/2017)... ... May 22, 2017 , ... ... in San Diego, California, this August will feature high-level speakers on quantum ... vehicles. , SPIE Optics and Photonics, the largest multidisciplinary optical sciences meeting in ...
(Date:5/23/2017)... Philadelphia, PA. (PRWEB) , ... May 23, 2017 ... ... Clinical Works as Vice President of Clinical Operations. She brings years ... Pharmaceuticals, and Yaupon Therapeutics. From her professional foundation as a licensed occupational therapist, ...
Breaking Biology Technology: