Navigation Links
Reliability of neuroscience research questioned
Date:4/10/2013

New research has questioned the reliability of neuroscience studies, saying that conclusions could be misleading due to small sample sizes.

A team led by academics from the University of Bristol reviewed 48 articles on neuroscience meta-analysis which were published in 2011 and concluded that most had an average power of around 20 per cent a finding which means the chance of the average study discovering the effect being investigated is only one in five.

The paper, being published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience today [10 April], reveals that small, low-powered studies are 'endemic' in neuroscience, producing unreliable research which is inefficient and wasteful.

It focuses on how low statistical power caused by low sample size of studies, small effects being investigated, or both can be misleading and produce more false scientific claims than high-powered studies.

It also illustrates how low power reduces a study's ability to detect any effects, and shows that when discoveries are claimed, they are more likely to be false or misleading.

The paper claims there is substantial evidence that a large proportion of research published in scientific literature may be unreliable as a consequence.

Another consequence is that the findings are overestimated because smaller studies consistently give more positive results than larger studies. This was found to be the case for studies using a diverse range of methods, including brain imaging, genetics and animal studies.

Kate Button, from the School of Social and Community Medicine, and Marcus Munaf, from the School of Experimental Psychology, led a team of researchers from Stanford University, the University of Virginia and the University of Oxford.

She said: "There's a lot of interest at the moment in improving the reliability of science. We looked at neuroscience literature and found that, on average, studies had only around a 20 per cent chance of detecting the effects they were investigating, even if the effects are real. This has two important implications - many studies lack the ability to give definitive answers to the questions they are testing, and many claimed findings are likely to be incorrect or unreliable."

The study concludes that improving the standard of results in neuroscience, and enabling them to be more easily reproduced, is a key priority and requires attention to well-established methodological principles.

It recommends that existing scientific practices can be improved with small changes or additions to methodologies, such as acknowledging any limitations in the interpretation of results; disclosing methods and findings transparently; and working collaboratively to increase the total sample size and power.


'/>"/>

Contact: Philippa Walker
philippa.walker@bristol.ac.uk
44-117-928-7777
University of Bristol
Source:Eurekalert

Related biology news :

1. University of Minnesota invention helps advance reliability of alternative energy
2. The neuroscience of finding your lost keys
3. Scripps Florida scientist awarded prestigious Javits Neuroscience Investigator Award
4. RayBiotech, Inc. Executes Neuroscience Biomarker Master Services Agreement with Banner Sun Health Research Institute
5. Neuroscience: The extraordinary ease of ordinal series
6. Media registration opens for Neuroscience 2012, worlds largest brain science meeting
7. Wiring bats for neuroscience research
8. UCSF pair win Gruber Foundation Neuroscience prize
9. 6th Annual Canadian Neuroscience Meeting, Vancouver, May 20-23, 2012
10. Stanford and MIT scientists win Perl-UNC Neuroscience prize
11. Measuring microbes makes wetland health monitoring more affordable, says MU researcher
Post Your Comments:
*Name:
*Comment:
*Email:
(Date:2/11/2016)... Calif. , Feb. 11, 2016  Vigilant Solutions announces ... LPR data are being used by Lee,s Summit ... including the recent location and arrest of a homicide suspect. ... Summit covers around 65 square miles and is ... Police Department has a single mobile license plate reader ...
(Date:2/10/2016)... 2016 --> ... iris recognition market report, combined with facial ... widely accepted for border control. Some multimodal ... iris recognition technology in a single device, ... two individual biometrics devices. http://www.rnrmarketresearch.com/global-iris-recognition-market-2016-2020-market-report.html ...
(Date:2/9/2016)... (NASDAQ: AWRE ), a leading supplier of biometrics software and ... ended December 31, 2015.  --> ... million, an increase of 61% compared to $4.3 million in the ... 2015 was $2.6 million compared to $0.2 million in the fourth ... Higher revenue and operating income in the fourth quarter of ...
Breaking Biology News(10 mins):
(Date:2/11/2016)... , Feb. 11, 2016  Dovetail Genomics™ LLC today ... beta program for a planned metagenomic genome assembly service. ... company,s metagenomic genome assembly method in a talk on ... Biology & Technology conference in Orlando, Fla. ... highly complex datasets is difficult. Using its proprietary ...
(Date:2/11/2016)... ... 2016 , ... Global Stem Cells Group, has ... The new facility will provide advanced protocols and state-of-the-art techniques in cellular medicine, ... , The new GSCG clinic is headed by four prominent Ecuadorian physicians, including ...
(Date:2/10/2016)... is introducing a hybrid membership model which will provide ... joining or renewing through an organizational purchasing model. For ... employee in any size association or AMC office can ... benefits.   John H. Graham, IV , ... organizations of any size and their employees to gain ...
(Date:2/10/2016)... ... February 10, 2016 , ... ... announced today the promotion of two long-standing principal investigators (PI) to the roles ... Clinical Research and Development. , Dr. Laurence Chu, a Benchmark Research PI in ...
Breaking Biology Technology: