Navigation Links
People don't put a high value on climate protection
Date:10/23/2013

This news release is available in German.

People are bad at getting a grip on collective risks. Climate change is a good example of this: the annual climate summits have so far not led to specific measures. The reason for this is that people attach greater value to an immediate material reward than to investing in future quality of life.

Therefore, cooperative behaviour in climate protection must be more strongly associated with short-term incentives such as rewards or being held in high esteem.

Would you rather have 40 or save the climate? When the question is put in such stark terms, the common sense answer is obviously: "stop climate change!" After all, we are well-informed individuals who act for the common good and, more particularly, for the good of future generations. Or at least that's how we like to think of ourselves.

Unfortunately, the reality is rather different. Immediate rewards make our brains rejoice and when such a reward beckons we're happy to behave cooperatively. But if achieving a common goal won't be rewarded until a few weeks have gone by, we are rather less euphoric and less cooperative. And if, instead of money, we're offered the prospect of a benefit for future generations, our enthusiasm for fair play wanes still further.

An international team of researchers led by Manfred Milinski from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology has shown how poorly we manage collective risk. "Our experiment is based on an essay which Thomas Schelling, the Nobel laureate in economics, wrote back in 1995", explains Milinski. Schelling pointed out that it was today's generation which would have to make the efforts for climate protection, while it would be future generations who would gain the benefits. So the people of the present have little motivation actually to do anything. Does this gloomy theory withstand experimental scrutiny?

To find out, the researchers had to convert this problem into a simple experimental situation. They had the participants play a modified public goods game. Such games are very common in behavioural economics and always follow the same pattern. The participants receive a certain amount of money and are invited to donate a proportion of it over a number of rounds. The donated money is doubled and this amount is divided equally between the players. Anything which was not donated goes directly in the player's pocket. The most profitable behaviour in such games is to donate nothing at all and simply benefit from the altruism of the other players.

The researchers modified the rules to incorporate averting impending climate change into the game. Each player received a starting fund of 40 and, playing over ten rounds, was able to decide how much of it to keep or donate. The donated money was invested in a climate change advertising campaign and was thus a simulated investment in climate protection. There were also bonus payments: those groups which donated more than half of their total fund were symbolically able to avoid dangerous climate change and were paid an additional 45 per participant. If the group donated less, all the players had a 90% probability of losing their endowment.

Three scenarios were devised to model the fact that the benefits of saving the climate are only felt in the future. Players from successful groups were paid their endowment either on the day after the experiment (scenario 1) or seven weeks later (scenario 2). In scenario 3, the endowment was not paid out to the players at all, but was instead invested in planting oak trees and thereby in climate protection. Over their lifetime, the trees will absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and their wood will be a valuable building material for future generations.

However, not one of the eleven groups which was offered the prospect of planting oak trees achieved the donation target. On average, just 57 were paid into the climate account instead the objective of 120. That's less than half of the target amount. In the first scenario, seven out of ten groups were successful, the participants donating on average 108, while the players in the second scenario still donated 83 (four out of ten groups were successful). "The result of our experiment paints a gloomy picture of the future", summarises Milinski. "We were unfortunately able to confirm Schelling's prediction - it's a disaster."

Climate change is the largest public goods game that has ever been played and the whole of humanity are its players. The problem is that while we are now making the payments, the fruits of our efforts will only be enjoyed very much later and they will be shared among the whole of humanity. We ourselves or our children will thus benefit only very slightly from any restrictions we place on our lives today and our motivation actually to do something is correspondingly low.

These results make it clear that if people are to invest in climate protection, they must have short-term incentives to do so. "It's not enough simply to point to the benefits future generations will enjoy", says Jochem Marotzke from the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, one of the authors of the study. "Climate protection will only be effective if the people making the effort will also be able to obtain a short-term material benefit from doing so, for instance by exporting climate-friendly technology."


'/>"/>

Contact: Dr. Manfred Milinski
milinski@evolbio.mpg.de
49-452-276-3254
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Source:Eurekalert

Related biology news :

1. In Nepal, villagers land uses help people and tigers, study finds
2. Strax Rejuvenation Helped So Many People Get Financing, it is Reinstating its Financing Program
3. Current pledges put over 600 million people at risk of higher water scarcity
4. Multiple genes manage how people taste sweeteners
5. Cattle can be a source of MRSA in people, scientists find
6. People have more empathy for battered dogs than human adult, but not child, victims
7. Trust in leaders, sense of belonging stir people to safeguard common goods, analysis shows
8. People with impaired glucose tolerance can show cognitive dysfunction
9. DNA abnormalities may contribute to cancer risk in people with type 2 diabetes
10. Peoples diets show a sugar-fat seesaw
11. Lifesaving HIV treatment could reach millions more people following landmark study
Post Your Comments:
*Name:
*Comment:
*Email:
(Date:3/9/2017)... Australia , March 9, 2017 /PRNewswire/ ... at the prestigious World Lung Imaging Workshop at the ... Fouras , was invited to deliver the latest data ... This globally recognised event brings together leaders at the ... latest developments in lung imaging. "The ...
(Date:3/7/2017)... England , March 7, 2017 Brandwatch , ... chosen by The Prince,s Trust to uncover insights to ... across The Trust. The UK,s leading youth charity will ... social campaign results and get a better understanding of the topics ... ...
(Date:3/6/2017)... 2017 Mintigo , the leader ... Predictive Sales Coach TM , its new artificial ... into Salesforce. This unique AI application will allow ... with deep knowledge of their customers and prospects ... Predictive Sales Coach extends Mintigo,s existing customer success ...
Breaking Biology News(10 mins):
(Date:3/23/2017)... , Mar 23, 2017 Research and ... Global Markets" report to their offering. ... The Global Market ... Billion in 2016 at a CAGR of 8.9%, ... and non-energetic bioproducts into seven major product segments: bio-derived chemicals, ...
(Date:3/23/2017)... March 23, 2017  BioPharmX Corporation (NYSE MKT: ... the dermatology market, today reported financial results for ... and will provide an update on the company,s ... "We are pleased to report that ... BioPharmX," said President Anja Krammer. "We achieved key ...
(Date:3/23/2017)... 23, 2017 According to a report by ... market is fragmented due to the presence of a large pool of ... Thermo Fisher , and Sigma-Aldrich, compete with each other in this ... held more than 76% of this market in 2016.  ... As of now, a large ...
(Date:3/22/2017)... , March 22, 2017 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ... Regeneron Genetics Center (RGC), U.K. Biobank and GSK to generate ... U.K. Biobank resource. The initiative will enable researchers to gain ... medicines for a wide range of serious and life threatening ... ...
Breaking Biology Technology: