Navigation Links
Different recipes for success in the world of plants

This release is available in German.

Halle/Saale. In order to prevail against native plants, non-native plant species develop special strategies. These differ in part considerably from the propagation strategies of endemic plant species. Dr. Ingolf Khn and Dr. Sonja Knapp of the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) reached this conclusion in a study published in the current issue of the scientific journal Ecology Letters. "These results are an argument in support of the view that the need to differentiate between native and non-native species in ecological systems remains", says Dr. Ingolf Khn.

Experts are currently debating whether this differentiation might be untenable, as it is only a question of the extent to which a plant species regardless of its origin is able to adapt to man-made conditions (Davis et al. (2011), Nature; Thompson et al. (2011) Trends in Ecology & Evolution). In the professional journal Trends in Ecology & Evolution (van Kleunen et al. (2011), Hulme et al. (2011)) a number of research groups counter with the argument that differentiating between these two groups contributes essentially to the understanding of modern ecosystems, as endemic and non-native species differ in many respects.

In their current study the UFZ researchers Dr. Ingolf Khn and Dr. Sonja Knapp investigated this thesis and examined the question, whether the factors influencing the frequency of occurrence of non-native plant species are different from those for native species. Their investigations made use of the BiolFlor biological-ecologic data base for the characteristic features of flora in Germany, with more than 3,600 native and also established introduced species of ferns and flowering plants. They compared such features as life span, pollinating strategy and the occupation of different habitats and relate these features to the frequency of occurrence of a particular species.

Their results show that the frequency of occurrence of the introduced plant species is in fact influenced by other strategies than the frequency of occurrence of native species. "The introduced species profit in particular from the fact that they blossom later in the year. The flowering time is, on the other hand, not a relevant feature for the frequency of occurrence of native species", says Dr. Sonja Knapp. A number of the most common introduced plant species seek a time niche between October and December, during which most of the native competitors no longer blossom. The remaining pollinators, such as bees, bumble bees and certain other insects, then pollinate only these plants. If there are no longer sufficient pollinators during this time, many of the introduced plants, such as asters and other composite flowers, can undergo self-pollination and in this manner ensure their survival.

For many native species an advantageous strategy is to become well established in many different habitats, such as in forested areas and simultaneously in meadows. "On the other hand, for non-native species this appears to be less important. They do not need to occupy as many different habitats as the native species in order to achieve the same frequency of occurrence", says Dr. Sonja Knapp. The introduced plant species are so successful in the few habitats in which they occur that widespread adaptation is no longer necessary. This is probably related to the origin of many non-native plants in Germany: The successfully introduced species are above all species which have adapted to an agricultural environment, which accompany seeds or have the character of field herbs, or species able to adapt to disturbances such as found in urban habitats, and which therefore have good possibilities for spreading over large areas.

Non-native plant species are, initially, in competition with the native species. It is therefore understandable that newly arrived plants occupy niches not completely used by native species. Consequently, such non-native species frequently make use of these niches. Most introduced species pose no serious threats to our ecosystems. Around one per cent of the introduced species are, however, invasive. This means that their spread is so significant that they suppress native plants and disturb the ecosystem.

The UFZ researchers therefore believe that the differentiation between native and non-native plant species remains correct and important, even when they have been established in Germany for many centuries. Dr. Ingolf Khn: "On the evolutionary time scale 500 years are a mere blinking of an eye. And because native and introduced species in fact exhibit differences in certain features, they should not all be considered together. Especially the importance of the early recognition of possible dangers due to the presence of introduced species requires knowledge of their origin."


Contact: Tilo Arnhold
Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres

Related biology news :

1. Molecular spectroscopy tracks living mammalian cells in real time as they differentiate
2. Why bats, rats and cats store different amounts of fat
3. San Diego Zoo researchers contribute to project using mummy DNA to differentiate croc species
4. Bone marrow-derived cells differentiate in the brain through mechanisms of plasticity
5. Seals show different levels of parenting skills
6. Study shows unexpected effect of climate change on body size for many different species
7. Metabolic state of brain cancer stem cells significantly different than the cancer cells they create
8. Bilingual babies vocabulary linked to early brain differentiation
9. Children of depressed mothers have a different brain
10. Aging brains are different in humans and chimpanzees
11. Unique gel capsule structure enables co-delivery of different types of drugs
Post Your Comments:
Related Image:
Different recipes for success in the world of plants
(Date:9/29/2015)... 2015 News facts: ... saving energy , Minimized design shrinks PC footprint ... Mode and embedded Fujitsu PalmSecure authentication enable enterprises to ... today shows that good things come in small packages, ... its enterprise desktop and mobile portfolio. Featuring workplace design ...
(Date:9/28/2015)... 2015 CLEAR, the leading biometric ... traveler service is coming to Austin-Bergstrom International ... a frictionless experience, serious speed and enhanced ... offers our travelers an expedited security screening ... Jim Smith , Executive Director, Austin-Bergstrom International ...
(Date:9/28/2015)... 28, 2015 The global ... USD 12.03 billion by 2020, growing at a CAGR ... as Backside Illumination (BSI) technique to improve picture quality ... period.      (Logo: , ... to reduce loss and, thus, reduce the noise interference ...
Breaking Biology News(10 mins):
(Date:10/13/2015)... SUNNYVALE, Calif. , Oct. 13, 2015  Cepheid ... the quarter ending September 30, 2015. ... financial results, total revenue for the third quarter of ... net loss per share is expected to be approximately ... financial results, non-GAAP net loss per share for the ...
(Date:10/13/2015)... Research and Markets( ) has announced ... for Bone Morphogenetic Protein Growth Factor Therapy - 16 ... --> --> Bone morphogenetic proteins ... bone after a fracture. In nature, these proteins have ... of the skeleton. There are twenty different BMPs that ...
(Date:10/13/2015)... ... October 13, 2015 , ... AxioMx ... that it has received a Phase I Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) grant ... of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), will fund the development of a technique to ...
(Date:10/13/2015)... 13, 2015  According to Kalorama Information, the ... $102 billion by the end of 2015. Clinical ... industry, as it is estimated that approximately 80% ... tests. In addition to diagnosing patients, clinical lab ... progression, monitor drug treatment and conditions, and determine ...
Breaking Biology Technology: