Navigation Links
Climate engineering -- what do the public think?
Date:1/13/2014

Members of the public have a negative view of climate engineering, the deliberate large-scale manipulation of the environment to counteract climate change, according to a new study.

The results are from researchers from the University of Southampton and Massey University (New Zealand) who have undertaken the first systematic large-scale evaluation of the public reaction to climate engineering.

The work is published in Nature Climate Change this week (12 January 2014).

Some scientists think that climate engineering approaches will be required to combat the inexorable rise in atmospheric CO2 due to the burning of fossil fuels. Climate engineering could involve techniques that reduce the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere or approaches that slow temperature rise by reducing the amount of sunlight reaching the Earth's surface.

Co-author Professor Damon Teagle of the University of Southampton said: "Because even the concept of climate engineering is highly controversial, there is pressing need to consult the public and understand their concerns before policy decisions are made."

Lead author, Professor Malcolm Wright of Massey University, said: "Previous attempts to engage the public with climate engineering have been exploratory and small scale. In our study, we have drawn on commercial methods used to evaluate brands and new product concepts to develop a comparative approach for evaluating the public reaction to a variety of climate engineering concepts."

The results show that the public has strong negative views towards climate engineering. Where there are positive reactions, they favour approaches that reduce carbon dioxide over those that reflected sunlight.

"It was a striking result and a very clear pattern," said Professor Wright. "Interventions such as putting mirrors in space or fine particles into the stratosphere are not well received. More natural processes of cloud brightening or enhanced weathering are less likely to raise objections, but the public react best to creating biochar (making charcoal from vegetation to lock in CO2) or capturing carbon directly from the air."

Nonetheless, even the most well regarded techniques still has a net negative perception.

The work consulted large representative samples in both Australia and New Zealand. Co-author Pam Feetham said: "The responses are remarkably consistent from both countries, with surprisingly few variations except for a slight tendency for older respondents to view climate engineering more favourably."

Professor Wright noted that giving the public a voice so early in technological development was unusual, but increasingly necessary. "If these techniques are developed the public must be consulted. Our methods can be employed to evaluate the responses in other countries and reapplied in the future to measure how public opinion changes as these potential new technologies are discussed and developed," he said.


'/>"/>

Contact: Glenn Harris
G.Harris@soton.ac.uk
44-023-805-93212
University of Southampton
Source:Eurekalert

Related biology news :

1. New study will help protect vulnerable birds from impacts of climate change
2. EU-funded study underlines importance of Congo Basin for global climate and biodiversity
3. UNH researchers find African farmers need better climate change data to improve farming practices
4. Fielding questions about climate change
5. Glacier-fed river systems threatened by climate change
6. Beating famine: Sustainable food security through land regeneration in a changing climate
7. Energy requirements make Antarctic fur seal pups vulnerable to climate change
8. Why spring is blooming marvelous (and climate change makes it earlier)
9. Carnegies Greg Asner named Energy/Climate Fellow by US State Department
10. Declines in Caribbean coral reefs pre-date damage resulting from climate change
11. Some corals like it hot: Heat stress may help coral reefs survive climate change
Post Your Comments:
*Name:
*Comment:
*Email:
(Date:8/26/2018)... ... August 24, 2018 , ... ... clinical diagnostic laboratories. However, this technology introduces many well-described challenges around data ... leads the South London NHS Genomic Medicine Centre. The Viapath Genetics Laboratories ...
(Date:8/23/2018)... ... 21, 2018 , ... CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing strategies have revolutionized ... the robust functional interrogation of complex biological processes. Gene editing in primary T-cells ... study of the autoimmunity, the understanding of host-pathogen dynamics that drive HIV replication ...
(Date:8/21/2018)... ... August 20, 2018 , ... When designing a fluidic ... Designers must ensure what is designed can be manufactured reliably and cost effectively ... in flow path design with specific focus on layered manifold technology. , Layered ...
Breaking Biology News(10 mins):
(Date:8/29/2018)... ... August 28, 2018 , ... USDM Life Sciences , the leading risk ... industries, announces that Manu Vohra will deliver a presentation at the BoxWorks 2018 ... Implement Box for GxP in 30 Days” , When: Thursday, August 30, 1:00-1:50 PM ...
(Date:8/23/2018)... (PRWEB) , ... August 23, 2018 , ... Visikol ... Visikol Co-Founder Dr. Thomas Villani. Through support from advisors, mentors, the Rutgers Technology Transfer ... , Visikol’s path from an idea to a successful biotech company has been ...
(Date:8/17/2018)... ... August 16, 2018 , ... ... is pleased to announce the expansion of their team. Dr. Dawn Dufield, Ph.D., ... launch an innovative large molecule LC-MS/MS group that will specialize in developing quantitative ...
(Date:8/14/2018)... ... August 14, 2018 , ... Buprenorphine (BUP) is a partial ... often prescribed as a sublingual co-formulation with the opioid antagonist naloxone (NXO) to ... learn from a review of the pharmacokinetics of BUP, NBP, and NXO and ...
Breaking Biology Technology: