Compensating forest owners with the METSO funding
"Achieving an optimal solution requires a combination of management regimes and careful landscape-level planning," says Mnkknen. He estimates that the multi-objective planning alone results in considerable improvements in species habitat availability without any extra costs.
"Small additional investments into biodiversity may yield large benefits. In particular, increasing habitat availability for the capercaillie is relatively inexpensive," says Mnkknen. Providing dead-wood associated species with more habitats tended to be more expensive because this would involve some refraining from harvesting. Giving up silvicultural thinnings turned out to be a cost-effective measure to improve habitats for numerous species in production forests.
According to the Finnish government's decision, 180 million euro will be spent in 20082016 (the METSO program) on maintaining biodiversity in mostly privately owned southern Finnish forests. Mnkknen suggests that a potentially efficient way to use the METSO funding would be to compensate forest-owners for economic losses from not thinning their forests.
"Small investments may provide large biodiversity benefits," he explains.
|Contact: Mikko Mönkkönen|
Academy of Finland