Navigation Links
Bad decisions arise from faulty information, not faulty brain circuits
Date:4/15/2013

AUDIO: Learn about research on decision-making in this podcast with Carlos Brody, an associate professor of molecular biology affiliated with the Princeton Neuroscience Institute and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator....

Click here for more information.

Making decisions involves a gradual accumulation of facts that support one choice or another. A person choosing a college might weigh factors such as course selection, institutional reputation and the quality of future job prospects.

But if the wrong choice is made, Princeton University researchers have found that it might be the information rather than the brain's decision-making process that is to blame. The researchers report in the journal Science that erroneous decisions tend to arise from errors, or "noise," in the information coming into the brain rather than errors in how the brain accumulates information.

These findings address a fundamental question among neuroscientists about whether bad decisions result from noise in the external information or sensory input or because the brain made mistakes when tallying that information. In the example of choosing a college, the question might be whether a person made a poor choice because of misleading or confusing course descriptions, or because the brain failed to remember which college had the best ratings.

Previous measurements of brain neurons have indicated that brain functions are inherently noisy. The Princeton research, however, separated sensory inputs from the internal mental process to show that the former can be noisy while the latter is remarkably reliable, said senior investigator Carlos Brody, a Princeton associate professor of molecular biology and the Princeton Neuroscience Institute (PNI), and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator.

"To our great surprise, the internal mental process was perfectly noiseless. All of the imperfections came from noise in the sensory processes," Brody said. Brody worked with first author Bingni Brunton, now a postdoctoral research associate in the departments of biology and applied mathematics at the University of Washington; and Matthew Botvinick, a Princeton associate professor of psychology and PNI.

The research subjects four college-age volunteers and 19 laboratory rats listened to streams of randomly timed clicks coming into both the left ear and the right ear. After listening to a stream, the subjects had to choose the side from which more clicks originated. The rats had been trained to turn their noses in the direction from which more clicks originated.

The test subjects mostly chose the correct side but occasionally made errors. By comparing various patterns of clicks with the volunteers' responses, researchers found that all of the errors arose when two clicks overlapped, and not from any observable noise in the brain system that tallied the clicks. This was true in experiment after experiment utilizing different click patterns, in humans and rats.

The researchers used the timing of the clicks and the decision-making behavior of the test subjects to create computer models that can be used to indicate what happens in the brain during decision-making. The models provide a clear window into the brain during the "mulling over" period of decision-making, the time when a person is accumulating information but has yet to choose, Brody said.

"Before we conducted this study, we did not have a way of looking at this process without inserting electrodes into the brain," Brody said. "Now thanks to our model, we have an estimation of what is going on at each moment in time during the formation of the decision."

The study suggests that information represented and processed in the brain's neurons must be robust to noise, Brody said. "In other words, the 'neural code' may have a mechanism for inherent error correction," he said.

"The new work from the Brody lab is important for a few reasons," said Anne Churchland, an assistant professor of biological sciences at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory who studies decision-making and was not involved in the study. "First, the work was very innovative because the researchers were able to study carefully controlled decision-making behavior in rodents. This is surprising in that one might have guessed rodents were incapable of producing stable, reliable decisions that are based on complex sensory stimuli.

"This work exposed some unexpected features of why animals, including humans, sometimes make incorrect decisions," Churchland said. "Specifically, the researchers found that errors are mostly driven by the inability to accurately encode sensory information. Alternative possibilities, which the authors ruled out, included noise associated with holding the stimulus in mind, or memory noise, and noise associated with a bias toward one alternative or the other."


'/>"/>

Contact: Morgan Kelly
mgnkelly@princeton.edu
609-258-5729
Princeton University
Source:Eurekalert

Related biology news :

1. Deciphering bacterial doomsday decisions
2. Study offers new tool for incorporating water impacts into policy decisions
3. Lariats: How RNA splicing decisions are made
4. New evidence that many genes of small effect influence economic decisions and political attitudes
5. Model forecasts long-term impacts of forest land-use decisions
6. Rats recall past to make daily decisions
7. Increasing water scarcity in Californias Bay-Delta will necessitate trade-offs; hard decisions needed to balance various environmental risks
8. UCLA life scientists unlock mystery of how handedness arises
9. Gene sequencing project finds new mutations to blame for a majority of brain tumor subtype
10. Ordinary skin cells morphed into functional brain cells
11. CSHL neuroscientists show jumping genes may contribute to aging-related brain defects
Post Your Comments:
*Name:
*Comment:
*Email:
(Date:3/20/2017)... At this year,s CeBIT Chancellor Dr. Angela Merkel visited ... to the DERMALOG stand together with the Japanese Prime Minster Shinzo Abe. ... the largest German biometrics company the two government leaders could see the ... well as DERMALOG´s multi-biometrics system.   Continue Reading ... ...
(Date:3/9/2017)... March 9, 2017 4Dx has publicly released ... Imaging Workshop at the University of Pennsylvania. Founder and ... deliver the latest data to world leaders in lung ... together leaders at the forefront of the industry to ... "The quality of the imaging is ...
(Date:3/6/2017)... March 6, 2017 Mintigo , ... today announced Predictive Sales Coach TM , its ... sales intelligence into Salesforce. This unique AI application ... sales organizations with deep knowledge of their customers ... intelligent engagement. Predictive Sales Coach extends Mintigo,s existing ...
Breaking Biology News(10 mins):
(Date:3/22/2017)... Milwaukee, WI (PRWEB) , ... March 22, 2017 , ... ... federal scientific research agencies as outlined in the Administration’s recently published fiscal year 2018 ... for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) by $5.8 billion or roughly 20% of ...
(Date:3/22/2017)... , March 22, 2017   Invitae ... growing genetic information companies, today announced the availability ... of Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) , a ... lethal genetic disorders among infants as well as ... childhood. The new test, announced during the American ...
(Date:3/20/2017)... ... 20, 2017 , ... Existing methods using LC-MS/MS suffer from ... reduce the impact on instrumentation. ICP-MS is a robust and specific analytical method ... This presentation will discuss the pros and cons of using LC-ICP-MS for the ...
(Date:3/20/2017)... PUYALLUP, Wash. , March 20, 2017 ... leading provider of ethical review of clinical research, announced ... Review Solution TM (SRS) for NIH-funded multi-site ... among its 2,300 institution clients, WIRB has an extensive ... upon our trusted status as the IRB of record ...
Breaking Biology Technology: