June 23, 2011 (Bethesda, MD): Today, on behalf of the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), Dr. Elaine Lyon gave public comments at the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) meeting on "Ultra High Throughput Sequencing for Clinical Diagnostic Applications Approaches to Assess Analytical Validity." As they begin developing their program to evaluate sequencing based diagnostics, AMP advised FDA officials on many important considerations for evaluating analytical validity.
The analytical validation requirements for NGS will vary based on the clinical application at issue, such as a mutation panel for a Mendelian disease versus transcriptome analysis. Also, performance of, and coverage needs for, a given platform are likely to differ depending on the nucleic acid analyzed, the characteristics of the DNA regions and the type of variations interrogated, the relative allele proportions of particular variants, and whether quantitative or qualitative results are desired. For these reasons, Dr. Lyon noted "this necessitates flexibility and individualization in the development of validation protocols, guidelines, and controls on an application-by-application basis."
While the analytical validity of a NGS instrument may be intrinsically very high, its data conversion and analysis software may have design flaws or performance limitations. As such, AMP told the FDA that for optimal FDA review of the test system, the analytical validity of the instrument and the performance of the bioinformatics software should be evaluated both independently and as a complete system.
AMP also pointed out the role of molecular pathology professionals in determining the most appropriate platform and technologies for answering the clinical question at issue and advised the FDA to be careful not to limit the practice of medicine. "Optimal patient care requires the ability of molecular pathology professionals to use their professional opinion of the most suita
|Contact: Mary Williams|
Association for Molecular Pathology